Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve management of multimorbidity in general practice: The 3D study

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2016, Pages

  Mann, Cindy ^a   Shaw, Alison ^a   Guthrie, Bruce ^b   Wye, Lesley ^a   Man, Mei See ^a   Hollinghurst, Sandra ^a   Brookes, Sara ^c   Bower, Peter ^d   Mercer, Stewart ^e   Salisbury, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MORBIDITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MALE; MANAGEMENT; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPLE CHRONIC CONDITIONS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIMORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PRACTICE MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84970018533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011260     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, et al. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e12-21.
2. Smith SM, O'Kelly S, O'Dowd T. GPs' and pharmacists' experiences of managing multimorbidity: a 'Pandora's box'. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:285-94.
3. Pefoyo AJ, Bronskill SE, Gruneir A, et al. The increasing burden and complexity of multimorbidity. BMC Public Health 2015;15:415.
4. Smith SM, Soubhi H, Fortin M, et al. Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ 2012;345:e5205.
5. Man M-S, Chaplin K, Mann C, et al. Improving the management of multimorbidity in general practice: protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial (The 3D Study). BMJ Open 2016;6:e011261.
6. Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient centred care. BMJ 2001;322:444-5.
7. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1087-110.
8. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C. Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care. Qual Life Res 2006;15:83-91.
9. O'Brien R, Wyke S, Guthrie B, et al. An 'endless struggle': a qualitative study of general practitioners' and practice nurses' experiences of managing multimorbidity in socio-economically deprived areas of Scotland. Chronic Illn 2011;7:45-59.
10. Noël PH, Frueh BC, Larme AC, et al. Collaborative care needs and preferences of primary care patients with multimorbidity. Health Expect 2005;8:54-63.
11. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ 2004;328:1561-3.
12. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2015;350:h1258.
13. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, et al. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2006;332:413-16.
14. Clarke DJ, Godfrey M, Hawkins R, et al. Implementing a training intervention to support caregivers after stroke: a process evaluation examining the initiation and embedding of programme change. Implement Sci 2013;8:96.
15. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655.
16. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. An overview. In: Steckler A, Linnan L, eds. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. 1st edn. San Francisco: Josset-Bass, 2002:1-23.
17. Griffin TL, Pallan MJ, Clarke JL, et al. Process evaluation design in a cluster randomised controlled childhood obesity prevention trial: the WAVES study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11:112.
18. Berendsen BA, Kremers SP, Savelberg HH, et al. The implementation and sustainability of a combined lifestyle intervention in primary care: mixed method process evaluation. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:37.
19. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, et al. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:119-27.
20. Byng R, Norman I, Redfern S, et al. Exposing the key functions of a complex intervention for shared care in mental health: case study of a process evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:274.
21. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, et al. Explaining the effects of an intervention designed to promote evidence-based diabetes care: a theory-based process evaluation of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2008;3:50.
22. Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, et al. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials 2013;14:15.
23. Gask L, Bower P, Lovell K, et al. What work has to be done to implement collaborative care for depression? Process evaluation of a trial utilizing the Normalization Process Model. Implement Sci 2010;5:15.
24. Wells M, Williams B, Treweek S, et al. Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials 2012;13:95.
25. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med 2010;8:63.
26. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage, 2003.
27. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Quality and Outcomes Framework. Secondary Quality and Outcomes Framework. 2015. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/qof
28. Bice TW, Boxerman SB. A quantitative measure of continuity of care. Med Care 1977;15:347-9.
29. Dixon-Woods M, Leslie M, Tarrant C, et al. Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program. Implement Sci 2013;8:70.
30. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, eds. Analyzing qualitative data. London; New York: Routledge, 1994:173-94.
31. Sidnell J. Talk. Conversation analysis. An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010:1-19.
32. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quantity 2003;36:391-409.