Both direct and vicarious experiences of nature affect children’s willingness to conserve biodiversity

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Soga, Masashi ^a   Gaston, Kevin J ^b   Yamaura, Yuichi ^c   Kurisu, Kiyo ^a   Hanaki, Keisuke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Biophilia; Conservation psychology; Ecosystem services; Environmental education; Global change; Human nature interactions; Pro environmental behavior; Public health; Well being

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; BIODIVERSITY; CHILD; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

BEHAVIOR; CHILD; CONSERVATION BIOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; EDUCATION; FRIEND; GLOBAL CHANGE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATH ANALYSIS; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE; WELLBEING; ATTITUDE; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEMALE; MALE;

HONSHU; JAPAN; KANTO; TOKYO [KANTO]; TOKYO [TOKYO (PRF)];

ATTITUDE; BIODIVERSITY; CHILD; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; TOKYO;

EID: 84969895670     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13060529     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Clements, R. An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemp. Issues Early Child. 2004, 5, 68–80. [CrossRef]
2. Hofferth, S.L. Changes in American children’s time—1997 to 2003. Electron. Int. J. Time Use Res. 2009, 6, 26–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Soga, M.; Gaston, K.J. Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2016, 2, 94–101. [CrossRef]
4. Grimm, N.B.; Faeth, S.H.; Golubiewski, N.E.; Redman, C.L.; Wu, J.; Bai, X.; Briggs, J.M. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 2008, 319, 756–760. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Seto, K.C.; Fragkias, M.; Güneralp, B.; Reilly, M.K. A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23777. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Miller, J.R. Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trend. Ecol. Evolut. 2005, 20, 430–434. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Turner, W.R.; Nakamura, T.; Dinetti, M. Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 2004, 54, 585–590. [CrossRef]
8. Fuller, R.A.; Gaston, K.J. The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol. Lett. 2009, 5, 352–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.C. Spatial–temporal dynamics of urban green space in response to rapid urbanization and greening policies. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 100, 268–277. [CrossRef]
10. Lin, J.; Chen, Q. Academic pressure and impact on students’ development in China. McGill J. Educ. 1995, 30, 149–168.
11. Valentine, G.; McKendrck, J. Children’s outdoor play: Exploring parental concerns about children’s safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum 1997, 28, 219–235. [CrossRef]
12. Veitch, J.; Bagley, S.; Ball, K.; Salmon, J. Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children’s active free-play. Health Place 2006, 12, 383–393. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Pyle, R.M. The Thunder Tree: Lessons from an Urban Wildland; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: Boston, MA, USA, 1993.
14. Kellert, S.R. Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations; Kahn, P.H., Kellert, S.R., Eds.; Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002; pp. 117–151.
15. Chawla, L. Learning to love the natural world enough to protect it. Barn 2006, 2, 57–78.
16. Bixler, R.D.; Floyd, M.F.; Hammitt, W.E. Environmental socialization quantitative tests of the childhood play hypothesis. Environ. Behav. 2002, 34, 795–818. [CrossRef]
17. Cheng, J.C.H.; Monroe, M.C. Connection to nature children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environ. Behav. 2012, 44, 31–49. [CrossRef]
18. Collado, S.; Staats, H.; Corraliza, J.A. Experiencing nature in children’s summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 33, 37–44. [CrossRef]
19. Zhang, W.; Goodale, E.; Chen, J. How contact with nature affects children’s biophilia, biophobia and conservation attitude in China. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 177, 109–116. [CrossRef]
20. Hinds, J.; Sparks, P. Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008, 28, 109–120. [CrossRef]
21. Stanley, M.C.; Beggs, J.R.; Bassett, I.E.; Burns, B.R.; Dirks, K.N.; Jones, D.N.; Linklater, W.L.; Macinnis-Ng, C.; Simcock, R.; Souter-Brown, G.; et al. Emerging threats in urban ecosystems: A horizon scanning exercise. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2015, 13, 553–560. [CrossRef]
22. Eagles, P.F.; Demare, R. Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. J. Environ. Educ. 1999, 30, 33–37. [CrossRef]
23. Ballouard, J.M.; Brischoux, F.; Bonnet, X. Children prioritize virtual exotic biodiversity over local biodiversity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Herzon, I.; Mikk, M. Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity and their willingness to enhance it through agri-environment schemes: A comparative study from Estonia and Finland. J. Nat. Conserv. 2007, 15, 10–25. [CrossRef]
25. Martín-López, B.; Montes, C.; Benayas, J. The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 139, 67–82. [CrossRef]
26. Johansson, M.; Sjöström, M.; Karlsson, J.; Brännlund, R. Is human fear affecting public willingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores? Soc. Nat. Resour. 2012, 25, 610–620. [CrossRef]
27. De Pinho, J.R.; Grilo, C.; Boone, R.B.; Galvin, K.A.; Snodgrass, J.G. Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88842.
28. Schlegel, J.; Rupf, R. Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in nature conservation: A survey among students of different educational institutions. J. Nat. Conserv. 2010, 18, 278–290. [CrossRef]
29. Fuchu City. 2015. Available online: https://www.city.fuchu.tokyo.jp/ (accessed on 25 March 2016).
30. Rosseel, Y. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012, 48, 1–36. [CrossRef]
31. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2015. Available online: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 25 March 2016).
32. MacCallum, R.C.; Roznowski, M.; Necowitz, L.B. Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 111, 490–504. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Soga, M.; Yamaura, Y.; Koike, S.; Gaston, K.J. Woodland remnants as an urban wildlife refuge: A cross-taxonomic assessment. Biodivers. Conserv. 2014, 23, 649–659. [CrossRef]
34. Samways, M.J. Rescuing the extinction of experience. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16, 1995–1997. [CrossRef]
35. Soga, M.; Yamaura, Y.; Aikoh, T.; Shoji, Y.; Kubo, T.; Gaston, K.J. Reducing the extinction of experience: Association between urban form and recreational use of public greenspace. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 143, 69–75. [CrossRef]
36. Dettmann-Easler, D.; Pease, J.L. Evaluating the effectiveness of residential environmental education programs in fostering positive attitudes toward wildlife. J. Environ. Educ. 1999, 31, 33–39. [CrossRef]
37. Duerden, M.D.; Witt, P.A. The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 379–392. [CrossRef]
38. Kellert, S.R.; Wilson, E.O. The Biophilia Hypothesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
39. Ulrich, R.S. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In The Biophilia Hypothesis; Kellert, S.R., Wilson, E.O., Eds.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 73–137.
40. Cox, D.T.C.; Gaston, K.J. Likeability of garden birds: Importance of species knowledge and richness in connecting people to nature. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. Bjerke, T.; Østdahl, T.; Kleiven, J. Attitudes and activities related to urban wildlife: Pet owners and non-owners. Anthrozoös 2003, 16, 252–262. [CrossRef]
42. Knight, A.J. “Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008, 28, 94–103. [CrossRef]
43. Rakison, D.H. Does women’s greater fear of snakes and spiders originate in infancy? Evol. Hum. Behav. 2009, 30, 438–444. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Ceríaco, L.M. Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: The influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2012, 8, 8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Matthies, E.; Selge, S.; Klöckner, C.A. The role of parental behaviour for the development of behaviour specific environmental norms-The example of recycling and re-use behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012, 32, 277–284. [CrossRef]
46. Hogue, C.L. Cultural entomology. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1987, 32, 181–199. [CrossRef]
47. Heberlein, T.A. Navigating environmental attitudes. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 26, 583–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed]