Big data how will big data impact clinical decision making and precision medicine in radiation therapy?

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 880-884

  Chen, Ronald C ^a   Gabriel, Peter E ^b   Kavanagh, Brian D ^c   McNutt, Todd R ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIG DATA; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BONE SCINTISCANNING; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MEMORY; DATA BASE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EARLY CANCER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HYPOFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY; MEDICARE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOTIC PROSTATECTOMY; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; TREATMENT PLANNING; EDITORIAL; RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER REGISTRY; DATA MINING; FACTUAL DATABASE; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; REGISTER;

CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; DATA MINING; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; PRECISION MEDICINE; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; REGISTRIES; SEER PROGRAM;

EID: 84969774580     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.052     Document Type: Editorial

References (19)

1. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Priorities for Personalized Medicine. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/ostp/PCAST/pcast-report-v2.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2015.
2. Shirvani SM, Jiang J, Chang JY, et al. Comparative effectiveness of 5 treatment strategies for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:1060-1070.
3. Bekelman JE, Mitra N, Handorf EA, et al. Effectiveness of androgendeprivation therapy and radiation therapy for older men with locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:716-722.
4. Churilla TM, Donnelly PE, Leatherman ER, et al. Total mastectomy or breast conservation therapy? How radiation oncologist accessibility determines treatment choice and quality: A SEER data-base analysis. Breast J 2015;21:473-480.
5. Jagsi R, Bekelman JE, Chen A, et al. Considerations for observational research using large data sets in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90:11-24.
6. Chen RC, Carpenter WR, Hendrix LH, et al. Receipt of guidelineconcordant treatment in elderly prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88:332-338.
7. Jagsi R, Falchook AD, Hendrix LH, et al. Adoption of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer after publication of randomized trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90: 1001-1009.
8. Falchook A, Salloum R, Hendrix L, et al. Overuse of bone scans during initial prostate cancer (CaP) workup, downstream procedures and associated Medicare costs [abstract 5040]. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(suppl).
9. Meyer AM, Wheeler SB, Weinberger M, et al. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research. Semin Radiat Oncol 2014;24:5-13.
10. Gandaglia G, Sammon JD, Chang SL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdissemination era. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1419-1426.
11. Wu B, Ricchetti F, Sanguineti G, et al. Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensitymodulated radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:1241-1247.
12. Petit SF, Wu B, Kazhdan M, et al. Increased organ sparing using shapebased treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RadiotherOncol 2012;102:38-44.
13. Wu B, McNutt T, Zahurak M, et al. Fully automated simultaneous integrated boosted-intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning is feasible for head and neck cancer: A prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:e647-e653.
14. Appenzoller LM, Michalski JM, Thorstad WL, et al. Predicting dosevolume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. Med Phys 2012;39:7446-7461.
15. Zhu X, Ge Y, Li T, et al. A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. Med Phys 2011; 38:719-726.
16. Moore K, Appenzoller L, Tan J, et al. Clinical implementation of dose-volume histogram predictions for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. J Phys Conf Ser 2014;489:012055.
17. Robertson SP, Quon H, Kiess AP, et al. A data-mining framework for large scale analysis of dose-outcome relationships in a database of irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Med Phys 2015;42:4329.
18. Marungo F, Robertson S, Quon H, et al. Creating a data science platform for developing complication risk models for personalized treatment planning in radiation oncology. Paper presented at: 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 5-8, 2015, Kauai, HI.
19. Matuszak M, Moran J, Xiao Y, et al. AAPM Task Group 263 tackling standardization ofnomenclature for radiation therapy. Paper presented at: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, July 12, 2015, Anaheim, CA.