What do international ethics guidelines say in terms of the scope of medical research ethics?

BMC Medical Ethics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Bernabe, Rosemarie D L C ^a   Van Thiel, Ghislaine J M W ^a   Van Delden, Johannes J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Comparison of guidelines; Ethics guidelines; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; REGISTRATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; VALIDITY; VULNERABLE POPULATION; BIOETHICS; CONSENSUS; ETHICS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; BIOETHICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONSENSUS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY;

EID: 84969730189     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0106-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hussein G, Upshur R. In: Pinto A, Upshur R, editors. An Introduction to Global Health Ethics. 2012. p. 103-16. Taylor & Francis.
2. Emanuel E, Wendler D, Grady C. In: The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Emanuel E, et al., editor. New York: Oxford University; 2008.
3. Kolman JM et al. Conflicts among Multinational Ethical and Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials of Therapeutic Interventions. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40:99-121.
4. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. New York: Oxford University; 2008.
5. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R1). International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 1996. i-53. http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public-Web-Site/ICH-Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6-R1-Guideline.pdf.
6. The Nuremberg code. at < http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html >
7. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2013. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ >
8. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. CIOMS; 2002. http://www.cioms.ch/publications/guidelines/guidelines-nov-2002-blurb.htm >
9. Council of Europe. Additional protocol to the convention on human rights and biomedicine, concerning biomedical research. 2005. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/195.htm >
10. National Institutes of Health. The Belmont Report. Belmont Rep. Ethical Princ. Guidel. Prot. Hum. Subj. Res. 4-6 (1979). doi:10.1002/9780471462422.eoct093
11. EMA. Reflection paper on ethical and GCP aspects of clinical trials of medicinal products for human use conducted outside of the EU/EEA and submitted in marketing authorization applications to the EU Regulatory Authorities. (2012). at < http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en-GB/document-library/Regulatory-and-procedural-guideline/2012/04/WC500125437.pdf >
12. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University; 2001.
13. Ballantyne A. 'Fair benefits' accounts of exploitation require a normative principle of fairness: response to Gbadegesin and Wendler, and Emanuel et al. Bioethics. 2008;22:239-44.
14. Countries, T. P. in the 2001 C. on E. A. of R. in D. Moral Standards for Research in Developing Countries: From 'Reasonable Availability' to 'Fair Benefits'. Hastings Center Report, vol. 34. 2004.
15. London AJ. In: The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Emanuel E, et al., editor. New York: Oxford University; 2008. p. 737-744.
16. Miller FG, Rosenstein DL. The therapeutic orientation to clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1383-6.
17. Jansen, L. A. Doctor vs. Scientist? Hastings Cent. Rep. 1 (2008). doi: 10.1353/hcr.2008.0033
18. Bernabe RD, van Thiel GJ, Raaijmakers JA, van Delden JJ. The fiduciary obligation of the physician-researcher in phase IV trials. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:11.
19. Anderson JA. Clinical research in context: reexamining the distinction between research and practice. J Med Philos. 2010;35:46-63.