Outpatient Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Matched-Pair Comparison with Inpatient Surgery

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 30, Issue , 2016, Pages S52-S56

  Berger, Andre K ^a   Chopra, Sameer ^a   Desai, Mihir M ^a   Aron, Monish ^a   Gill, Inderbir S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINENCE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MONITORING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETURN TO WORK; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SCORING SYSTEM; AMBULATORY SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84969667980     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0135     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Litwin MS, Shpall AI, Dorey F. Patient satisfaction with short stays for radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997;49:898-905; discussion 905-906.
2. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Andrews JR, et al. Outpatient prostatectomy: Too much too soon or just what the patient ordered. Urology 2010;75:421-424.
3. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002;60:864-868.
4. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: Cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 2004;172: 1431-1435.
5. Ruiz-Deya G, Davis R, Srivastav SK, et al. Outpatient radical prostatectomy: Impact of standard perineal approach on patient outcome. J Urol 2001;166:581-586.
6. Diaz M, Peabody JO, Kapoor V, et al. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67:1168-1176.
7. Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62: 382-404.
8. Thompson JE, Egger S, Bohm M, et al. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: A prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 2014;65:521-531.