A cognitive map framework to support integrated environmental assessment

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 77, Issue , 2016, Pages 81-94

  Mourhir, Asmaa ^a   Rachidi, Tajjeeddine ^a   Papageorgiou, Elpiniki I ^b   Karim, Mohammed ^c   Alaoui, Faycal Sossi ^d  

^a AL AKHAWAYN UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

^b Department of Electrical Engineering Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Central Greece   (Greece)

^c SIDI MOHAMED BEN ABDELLAH UNIVERSITY   (Morocco)

^d Conseil Ingénierie et Développement ^*  (Morocco)

Author keywords

Air pollution; DPSIR; Dynamic cause effect relationship; Fuzzy cognitive map; Fuzzy inference system; Integrated assessment

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FUZZY RULES; FUZZY SYSTEMS; INGESTION (ENGINES); LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; POLLUTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CAUSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS; DPSIR; FUZZY COGNITIVE MAP; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEMS; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT;

FUZZY INFERENCE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; STAKEHOLDER; SYNERGISM;

EID: 84969663917     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aguilar J. Different dynamic causal relationship approaches for cognitive maps. Appl. Soft Comput. 2013, 13(1):271-282. 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.037.
2. Aguilar J., Contreras J. The FCM designer tool. Fuzzy Cognitive Maps 2010, vol. 247:71-87. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-03220-2_4. M. Glykas (Ed.).
3. Axelrod R. Structure of Decision: the Cognitive Maps of Political Elites 1976, Princeton University, Princeton.
4. Bidone E.D., Lacerda L.D. The use of DPSIR framework to evaluate sustainability in coastal areas. Case study: Guanabara Bay basin, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Reg. Environ. Change 2004, 4(1):5-16. 10.1007/s10113-003-0059-2.
5. Carvalho J., Tomé J. Rule based fuzzy cognitive maps-qualitative systems dynamics. Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 2000. NAFIPS. 19th International Conference of the North American, 2000 2000, 407-411. 10.1109/NAFIPS.2000.877462.
6. Carvalho J., Tomé J. Fuzzy mechanisms for qualitative causal relations. Views on Fuzzy Sets and Systems from Different Perspectives 2009, vol. 243:393-415. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-540-93802-6_19. R. Seising (Ed.).
7. Cingolani P., Alcala-Fdez J. jFuzzyLogic: a robust and flexible fuzzy-logic inference system language implementation. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems 2012, 1-8. 10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2012.6251215.
8. Gabrielsen P., Bosch P. Environmental Indicators: Typology and Use in Reporting 2003, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
9. Gari S.R., Newton A., Icely J.D. A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2015, 103(0):63-77. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.013.
10. Gray S.A., Zanre E., Gray S.R.J. Fuzzy cognitive maps as representations of mental models and group beliefs. Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Applied Sciences and Engineering 2014, vol. 54:29-48. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-39739-4_2. E.I. Papageorgiou (Ed.).
11. Hamilton S.H., ElSawah S., Guillaume J.H.A., Jakeman A.J., Pierce S.A. Integrated assessment and modelling: overview and synthesis of salient dimensions. Environ. Model. Softw. 2015, 64(0):215-229. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.005.
12. Henly-Shepard S., Gray S.A., Cox L.J. The use of participatory modeling to promote social learning and facilitate community disaster planning. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 45(0):109-122. 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.004.
13. Holman I.P., Rounsevell M.D.A., Shackley S., Harrison P.A., Nicholls R.J., Berry P.M., Audsley E. A regional, multi-sectoral and integrated assessment of the impacts of climate and socio-economic change in the Uk. Clim. Change 2005, 71(1-2):9-41. 10.1007/s10584-005-5927-y.
14. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications 1981, (New York).
15. IEC IEC 61131-Programmable Controllers-part 7: Fuzzy Control Programming 2000, International Electrotechnical Commission technical committee industrial process measurement and control, Geneva.
16. Jakeman A.J., Chen S.H., Rizzoli A.E., Voinov A.A. Modelling and software as instruments for advancing sustainability. Environmental Modelling, Software and Decision Support 2008, vol. 3:1-13. Elsevier. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.018. A.J. Jakeman, A.A. Voinov, A.E. Rizzoli, S.H. Chen (Eds.).
17. Jakeman A.J., Letcher R.A. Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2003, 18(6):491-501. 10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00024-0.
18. Janssen J.A.E.B., Krol M.S., Schielen R.M.J., Hoekstra A.Y., de Kok J.L. Assessment of uncertainties in expert knowledge, illustrated in fuzzy rule-based models. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221(9):1245-1251. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.01.011.
19. Jeffrey P., McIntosh B.S. Description, diagnosis, prescription: a critique of the application of co-evolutionary models to natural resource management. Environ. Conserv. 2006, 33(04):281-293.
20. Jetter A.J., Kok K. Fuzzy cognitive maps for futures studies-A methodological assessment of concepts and methods. Futures 2014, 61(0):45-57. 10.1016/j.futures.2014.05.002.
21. Kafetzis A., McRoberts N., Mouratiadou I. Using fuzzy cognitive maps to support the analysis of stakeholders' views of water resource use and water quality policy. Fuzzy Cognitive Maps 2010, vol. 247:383-402. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-03220-2_16. M. Glykas (Ed.).
22. Karageorgis A., Kapsimalis V., Kontogianni A., Skourtos M., Turner K., Salomons W. Impact of 100-Year human interventions on the deltaic coastal zone of the inner Thermaikos Gulf (Greece): a DPSIR framework analysis. Environ. Manag. 2006, 38(2):304-315. 10.1007/s00267-004-0290-8.
23. Kontogianni A.D., Papageorgiou E.I., Tourkolias C. How do you perceive environmental change? fuzzy cognitive mapping informing stakeholder analysis for environmental policy making and non-market valuation. Appl. Soft Comput. 2012, 12(12):3725-3735. 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.05.003.
24. Kosko B. Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 1986, 24:65-75.
25. Ledoux L., Beaumont N., Cave R., Turner R.K. Scenarios for integrated river catchment and coastal zone management. Reg. Environ. Change 2005, 5(2-3):82-96. 10.1007/s10113-004-0079-6.
26. Lorenzoni I., Jordan A., Hulme M., Kerry Turner R., O'Riordan T. A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment: Part I. Integrating socio-economic and climate change scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change 2000, 10(1):57-68. 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00012-1.
27. Mamdani E.H. Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. Electrical Engineers. Proc. Institut. 1974, 121(12):1585-1588. 10.1049/piee.1974.0328.
28. Mamdani E.H., Assilian S. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 1975, 7(1):1-13. 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2.
29. Maxim L., Spangenberg J.H., O'Connor M. An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69(1):12-23. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.017.
30. Ministry of Energy Mines Water and Environment Morocco's national charter for environment and sustainable development. Green Compass Research 2010.
31. Mourhir A., Rachidi T., Karim M. Design and implementation of an environmental decision support System: tools, attributes and challenges. Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Environmental Informatics - Informatics for Environmental Protection, Sustainable Development and Risk Management 2014.
32. Mourhir A., Rachidi T., Karim M. River water quality index for Morocco using a fuzzy inference system. Environ. Syst. Res. 2014, 3(1):1-12. 10.1186/s40068-014-0021-y.
33. Mourhir A., Rachidi T., Karim M. A generic decision support system for environmental policy making: attributes, initial findings and challenges. Advances and New Trends in Environmental and Energy Informatics. Progress in IS 2016, 297-315. Springer International Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23455-7_16, J. Marx Gomez, M. Sonnenschein, U. Vogel, A. Winter, B. Rapp, N. Giesen (Eds.).
34. Özesmi U., Özesmi S.L. Ecological models based on people's knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol. Model. 2004, 176(1-2):43-64. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.10.027.
35. Papageorgiou E.I., Salmeron J.L. A review of fuzzy cognitive maps research during the last decade. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2013, 21(1):66-79. 10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2201727.
36. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications 2009, Wiley, New York.
37. Saisana M., Tarantola S., Ift Protection, SotC Technological, Unit E.R.M. State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development. European Commission 2002, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
38. Salmeron J.L., Vidal R., Mena A. Ranking fuzzy cognitive map based scenarios with TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39(3):2443-2450. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.094.
39. Salski A. Ecological applications of fuzzy logic. Ecological Informatics 2006, 3-14. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/3-540-28426-5_1. F. Recknagel (Ed.).
40. Samarasinghe S., Strickert G. Mixed-method integration and advances in fuzzy cognitive maps for computational policy simulations for natural hazard mitigation. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 39(0):188-200. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.06.008.
41. Sarraf M. Rapport N° 2592-MOR: Royaume du Maroc Evaluation du coût de la dégradation de l'environnement 2003, Bureau Régional Moyen Orient & Afrique du Nord, Département Eau, Environnement, Développement Social et Rural, Washington, DC.
42. Shepard R.B. Quantifying Environmental Impact Assessments Using Fuzzy Logic 2005, Springer, New York.
43. Silvert W. Ecological impact classification with fuzzy sets. Ecol. Model. 1997, 96(1-3):1-10. 10.1016/S0304-3800(96)00051-8.
44. Smeets E., Weterings R. Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview, EEA Technical Report No 25 1999, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
45. Svarstad H., Petersen L.K., Rothman D., Siepel H., Wätzold F. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy 2008, 25(1):116-125. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.005.
46. Taber R. Knowledge processing with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Expert Syst. Appl. 1991, 2(1):83-87. 10.1016/0957-4174(91)90136-3.
47. Takagi T., Sugeno M. Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man Cybern. SMC-15 1985, (1):116-132. 10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399.
48. van Vliet M., Kok K., Veldkamp T. Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures 2010, 42(1):1-14. 10.1016/j.futures.2009.08.005.
49. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25(11):1268-1281. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007.
50. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8:338-353.
51. Zhang H., Song J., Su C., He M. Human attitudes in environmental management: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and policy option simulations analysis for a coal-mine ecosystem in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 115(0):227-234. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.032.