Lot change for reagents and calibrators

Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 49, Issue 16-17, 2016, Pages 1211-1212

  Don Wauchope, Andrew C ^a,b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b HAMILTON REGIONAL LABORATORY MEDICINE PROGRAM   (Canada)

Author keywords

Laboratory quality; Lot change; Quality control

Indexed keywords

REAGENT; DYES, REAGENTS, INDICATORS, MARKERS AND BUFFERS;

CALIBRATOR; HUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; CALIBRATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CALIBRATION; INDICATORS AND REAGENTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84969557033     PISSN: 00099120     EISSN: 18732933     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.04.003     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. [1] Bais, R., Chesher, D., More on lot-to-lot changes. Clin. Chem. 60:2 (Mar 2014), 413–414.
2. [2] CLSI, User Evaluation of Between-Reagent Lot Variation. Approved Guideline. CLSI Document AP26-A. 2013, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
3. [3] Miller, W.G., Erek, A., Cunningham, T.D., Oladipo, O., Scott, M.G., Johnson, R.E., Commutability limitations influence quality control results with different reagent lots. Clin. Chem. 57:1 (Feb 2011), 76–83.
4. [4] Cho, M.C., Kim, S.Y., Jeong, T.D., Lee, W., Chun, S., Min, W.K., Statistical validation of reagent lot change in the clinical chemistry laboratory can confer insights on good clinical laboratory practice. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 51:6 (Oct 20 2014), 688–694.
5. [5] Kenny, D., Fraser, C.G., Petersen, P.H., Kallner, A., Consensus agreement. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest., 59(7), 1999, 585.
6. [6] Sandberg, S., Fraser, C.G., Horvath, A.R., Jansen, R., Jones, G., Oosterhuis, W., et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st strategic conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 53:6 (Jun 2015), 833–835.