Modeling the user acceptance of e-mail

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Hubona, G S ^a   Burton Jones, A ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS; COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; LEVEL OF EDUCATIONS; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER ACCEPTANCE;

ELECTRONIC MAIL;

EID: 84969530929     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173675     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Adams, D. A., R. R. Nelson, and P. A. Todd, "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication," MIS Quarterly, 16, 1992, 227- 247.
2. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980.
3. Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad, "Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?" Decision Sciences, 30, 1999, 361-391.
4. Alavi, M. and E. A. Joachimisthaler, "Revisiting DSS Implementation Research: A Meta-analysis of the Literature and Suggestions for Researchers," MIS Quarterly, 16, 1992, 95-116.
5. Barron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny, "The Moderatormediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1986, 1173-1182.
6. Chin, W. W., PLS-Graph User's Guide Version 3.0, 2001, (User's manual that accompanies PLS-GRAPH version 3.00 build 279 provided by Wynn Chin).
7. Compeau, D. R. and C. A. Higgins, "Computer Selfefficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test," MIS Quarterly, 19, 1995, 189-211.
8. Compeau, D., C. A. Higgins, and S. Huff, "Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study," MIS Quarterly, 23, 1999, 145-158.
9. Dambrot, F. H., S. M. Silling, and A. Zook, "Psychology of Computer Use: Sex Differences in Prediction of Course Grades in a Computer Language Course," Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 1988, 627-636.
10. Davis, F. D., A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results, doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
11. Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, 13, 1989, 319-339.
12. Davis, F. D., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 1993, 475-487.
13. Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, 35, 1989, 982- 1003.
14. Davis, L. D. and F. D. Davis, "The Effect of Training Techniques and Personal Characteristics on Training End users of Information Systems," Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 1990, 93-110.
15. Dishaw, M. T. and D. M. Strong, "Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-technology Fit Constructs," Information & Management, 36, 1999, 9-21.
16. Egan, D. E. and L. M. Gomez, "Assaying, Isolating and Accommodating Individual Differences in Learning a Complex Skill," Individual Differences in Cognition, Ed. R. Dillon, Academic Press, New York, 1985.
17. Elkerton, J. and R. C. Williges, "Information Retrieval Strategies in a File-search Environment," Human Factors, 26, 1984, 171-184.
18. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, "Attitudes and Opinions," Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 1977, 487-544.
19. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison- Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975.
20. Gefen, D. and D. Straub, "Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model," MIS Quarterly, 21, 1997, 389-400.
21. Gefen, D., D. W. Straub, and M.-C. Boudreau, "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice," Communications of The AIS, 4, 2000, 1-77.
22. Harrison, A.W. and R. K. Rainer Jr., "The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-user Computing," Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 1992, 93- 111.
23. Hartwick, J. and H. Barki, "Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use," Management Science, 40, 1994, 440-465.
24. Howard, R. A. "Decision Analysis: Practice and Promise," Management Science, 34, 1988, 679-695.
25. Igbaria, M. and S. Parasuraman, "A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes Towards Microcomputers," Journal of Management, 15, 1989, 373-388.
26. Igbaria, M., N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg, and A. L. Cavaye, "Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model," MIS Quarterly, 21, 1997, 279- 305.
27. Karahanna, E., "Evaluative Criteria and User Acceptance of End-user Information Technology: A Study of End User Cognitive and Affective Processes," unpublished dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1993.
28. Karahanna, E. and M. Limayem, "E-mail and V-mail Usage: Generalizing Across Technologies," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10, 2000, 49-66.
29. Karahanna, E. and D. Straub, "The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use," Information & Management, 35, 1999, 237-250.
30. Levin, T. and C. Gordon, "Effect of Gender and Computer Experience on Attitudes Toward Computers," Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 1989, 69-88.
31. Lucas, H. C., "Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation," MIS Quarterly, 2, 1978, 27-52.
32. Markus, M. L., "Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice," Organization Science, 5, 1994, 502-527.
33. Mathieson, K., "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, 2, 1991, 173-191.
34. Mathieson, K., E. Peacock, and W. Chin, "Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources," The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32, 2001, 86-112.
35. Moore, G. C. and I. Benbasat, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, 2, 1991, 192-222.
36. Raub, A. C. "Correlates of Computer Anxiety in College Students," unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1981.
37. Rosson, M. B. "Patterns of Experience in Text Editing," Proceedings of the CHI'83 Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1983, 171-175.
38. Segars, A. H. and V. Grover, Re-examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis," MIS Quarterly, 17, 1993, 517-525.
39. Singley, M. K. and J. R. Anderson, "The Transfer of Text Editing Skill," International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 1979, 403-423.
40. Taylor, S. and P. Todd, "Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience," MIS Quarterly, 19, 1995, 561-570.
41. Venkatesh, V. and F. D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, 46, 2000, 186-204.
42. Zmud, R. W. "Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Management Science, 25, 1979, 966-979.