Is the applicability of Web-based surveys for academic research limited to the field of information technology?

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Roztocki, N ^a   Lahri, N A ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WEBSITES;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; COMPUTER LITERACY; ONLINE DATA COLLECTION; ONLINE SURVEYS; POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE; WEB-BASED SURVEYS;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84969524569     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174760     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Roztocki, N., "Using Internet-Based Surveys for Academic Research: Opportunities and Problems", Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) National Conference, 2001, pp. 290-295.
2. Zhang, Y., "Using the Internet for Survey Research: A Case Study", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(1), 2000, pp. 57-68.
3. Cook, C., Heath, F., and Thompson, R. L., " A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys", Education and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 2000, December, pp. 821-836.
4. Schmidt, W. C., "World-Wide Web Survey Research: Benefits, Potential Problems, and Solutions" Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(2), 1997, pp. 274-279.
5. Sackmary, B., "Internet Survey Research: Practices, Problems, and Prospects", Proceedings of the American Marketing Association Summer Conference, 1998, pp. 41-49.
6. McCoy, S., and Marks Jr, P. V., "Using Electronic Surveys to Collect Data: Experiences from the Field", Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 2001 Conference, 2001, pp.1502-1505.
7. Mehta, R., and Sivadas, E., "Comparing responses rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys", Journal of the Market Research Society, 37(4), 1995, October, pp. 429-439.
8. Stanton, J. M., "An Empirical Assessment of Data Collection Using the Internet", Personnel Psychology, 51, 1998, pp. 709-725.
9. Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. S., "Responses Effects in the Electronic Survey", Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 1986, pp. 402-413.
10. Pitkow, J. E., and Kehoe, C. M., "Emerging Trends in the WWW User Population", Communications of the ACM, 39(6), 1996, June, pp. 106-108.
11. Bradley, N., "Sampling for Internet surveys. An examination of respondent selection for Internet research", Journal of the Market Research Society, 41(4), 1999, October, pp. 387-395.
12. Bertot, J. C., and McClure, C. R., "Electronic Surveys: Methodological Implications For Using the World Wide Web to Collect Survey Data". Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science (ASIS) Annual Meeting, 1996, pp. 173-185.
13. Likert, R., "A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes", Archives of Psychology, (140), 1932, pp. 1-55.
14. Couper, M. P., "Web Surveys A Review of Issues and Approaches", Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 2000, pp. 464-494.
15. Coomber, R., "Sociological Research Online", 2(2), 1997, 'http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/2.html'.
16. Schmith, M. A., and Leight, B., "Virtual Subjects: Using the Internet as an Alternative Source of Subjects and Research Environment", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(4), 1997, pp. 496-505.
17. Cho, H., and LaRose, R., "Privacy Issues in Internet Surveys", Social Science Computer Review, 17(4), 1999, Winter, pp. 421-434.
18. Church, A. H., "Estimating the Effects of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis", Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 1995, 62-79.