A theory and measurement of meeting satisfaction

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Briggs, R O ^a,b   De Vreede, G J ^b,c   Reinig, B A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^d SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; FIELD STUDIES; IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURES; RESEARCH RESULTS; SATISFACTION ATTAINMENT THEORIES; SURVEY INSTRUMENTS; WORKING PROFESSIONALS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84969497757     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173677     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., and Vogel, D.R. "Using information technology to add value to management education," Academy of Management Journal, 40, 6 (December 1997), 1310-1333.
2. Andres, H.P., and Zmud, R.W. "A contingency approach to software project coordination," Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (Winter 2001-2002), 41-70.
3. Browne, M.W., and Cudeck, R., "Alternative ways of assessing model fit," In Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (Eds.). Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
4. Castore, C.H., and Murnighan, J.K., Determinants of support for group decisions, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 1 (August 1978), 75-92.
5. Connolly, T.; Jessup, L.; and Valacich, J.S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 6 (1990), 689-703.
6. Dennis, A.R. Information exchange and use in group decision making: you can lead a group to information but you can't make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20, 4 (1996) 433-455.
7. Easton, A.C.; Vogel, D.R.; and Nunamaker, J.F. Stakeholder Identification and assumption surfacing in small groups: an experimental study. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3 (1989), 344-351.
8. Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3 (Winter 1998-1999), 7-149.
9. Fjermestad, J. and Hiltz, S.R. Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3 (Winter 2000), 112-157.
10. Gallupe, R.B.; Cooper, W.H.; Grise, L.M.; and Bastianutti, L.M. Blocking electronic brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 1 (1994), 77-86.
11. Gallupe, R.B.; Dennis, A.R.; Cooper, W.H.; Valacich, J.S.; Bastianutti, L.M.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr., Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 2 (June 1992), 350-369.
12. George, J.F.; Dennis, A.R.; and Nunamaker, J.F. An experimental investigation of facilitation in an EMS decision room. Group Decision and Negotiation, I (1992), 57-70.
13. Green, S.G., and Taber, T.D., The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 1 (February 1980), 97-106.
14. Kerr, D.S., and Murthy, U.S., Group decision support systems and cooperative learning in auditing: an experimental investigation, Journal of Information Systems, 18, 2 (1994), 85-96.
15. Mennecke, B.E., and Valacich, J.S. Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions, Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 2 (Fall 1998), 173-197.
16. Miranda, S.M., and Bostrom, R.P., Meeting facilitation: Process versus content interventions, Journal of Management Information Systems 15, 4 (Spring 1999), 89-114.
17. Olson, J.S.; Olson, G.M.; Storrosten, M.; and Carter, M. How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (October 1992), 91-98.
18. Reinig, B.A. An Investigation of Meeting Satisfaction in GSS and FTF Meetings," Thirty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (2002), 1-10.
19. Reinig, B.A.; Briggs, R.O.; Shepherd, M.M.; Yen, J.; and Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. Affective reward and the adoption of group support systems: productivity is not always enough. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 3 (Winter 1995-1996), 171-185.
20. Steeb, R., and Johnston, S.C. A computer-based interactive system for group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, 11, 8 (1981), 544552.
21. Valacich, J.S.; Dennis, A.R.; and Connolly, T. Idea generation in computer-based groups: a new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57 (1994), 448a67.
22. Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D.F., and Summers, G.F. Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In Heise, D.R. (Ed.) Sociological Methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1977.
23. Wilson, J., and Jessup, L.M. A field experiment on GSS anonymity and group member status. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4 (1995), 212-221.
24. Wood, J.G., and Nosek, J.T. Discrimination of structure and technology in a group support system: the role of process complexity. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, 3 (1994), 187-199.