The english double modal conspiracy

Diachronica

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 199-212

  Nagle, Stephen J ^a  

^a Wall College of Business   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969469696     PISSN: 01764225     EISSN: 15699714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/dia.11.2.04nag     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker, Carl L. 1991. “The Syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 22.387-429.
2. Battistella, Edwin L. 1991. “The Treatment of Negation in Double Modal Constructions”. Linguistic Analysis 21.49-65.
3. Brown, Keith. 1991. “Double Modals in Hawick Scots”. Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation ed. by Peter Trudgill & J. K. Chambers, 74-103. London: Longman.
4. Butters, Ronald R. 1973. “Acceptability Judgements for Double Modals in Southern Dialects”. New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English ed. by Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger Shuy, 276-286. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.
5. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. Coleman, William. 1975. Multiple Modals in Southern States English. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana Univ., Bloomington, Ind.
8. Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universal. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. Dickson, R. W. 1988. Ulster Emigration to Colonial America 1718-1775. Belfast: Ulster Historical Foundation.
10. Givon, Talmy. 1984, 1990. Syntax: Afunctional-typological introduction. 2 vols. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
11. Grant, William & David Murison, eds. 1931-76. The Scottish National Dictionary. Edinburgh: Scottish National Dictionary Association.
12. Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
13. Haiman, John. “Iconic and Economic Motivation”. Language 54.781-819.
14. Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
15. Leyburn, James C. 1962. The Scotch-Irish: A social history. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
16. Lightfoot, David W. 1974. “The Diachronic Analysis of English Modals”. Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Historical Linguistics ed. by John M. Anderson & Charles Jones, 219-249. Amsterdam: North Holland.
17. Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
18. Lightfoot, David W. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
19. Miller, James & Keith Brown. 1982. “Aspects of Scottish English Syntax”. English World-Wide 3.3-17.
20. Mishoe, Margaret & Michael B. Montgomery. 1994. “The Pragmatics of Multiple Modal Variation in North and South Carolina”. American Speech.693- 29.
21. Montgomery, Michael B. 1989. “Exploring the Roots of Appalachian English”. English World-Wide 10.227-278.
22. Montgomery, Michael B.& Stephen J. Nagle. 1994[for 1993]. “Double Modals in Scotland and the Southern United States: Trans-Atlantic inheritance or independent development?”. Folia Linguistica Historica 14.91-107.
23. Nagle, Stephen J. 1989. Inferential Change and Syntactic Modality in English. (= Bamberger Beiträge zur Englischen Sprachwissenschaft, 23.) Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
24. Nagle, Stephen J.1993. “Double Modals in Early English”. Historical Linguistics
25. Nagle, Stephen J.1989: Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Henk Aertsen & Robert Jeffers, 363-370. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
26. Nagle, Stephen J. To appear. “The English Double Modals: Internal or external change?”. Language Contact and Linguistic Change ed. by Jacek Fisiak. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1992. “Iconicity and Generative Grammar”. Language 68.756-796.
28. Plank, Frans. 1984. “The Modals Story Retold”. Studies in Language 8.305-354.
29. Rinehart, Tanya. 1976. The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, M.I.T., Cambridge, Mass.
30. Roberts, Ian G. 1985. “Agreement Parameters and the Development of of English Modal Auxiliaries”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3.2157.
31. Schächter, Paul. 1983. “Explaining Auxiliary Order”. Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol.II, ed. by Frank Heny & Barry Richards, 145-204. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
32. Shepherd, Susan C. 1982. “From Deontic to Epistemic: An analysis of modals in the history of English, creoles, and language acquisition”. Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics ed. by Anders Ahl- qvist, 316-324. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
33. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1972. A History of English Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
34. Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change”. Language 65.31-55.
35. Visser, F. Th. 1963-73. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 4 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.