Architectural accessibility and reading complexity of US state e-government for older adult users

Electronic Government

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 115-129

  Ann Becker, Shirley ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

information technology and aging; literacy; web accessibility; web design; web usability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969447117     PISSN: 17407494     EISSN: 17407508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/eg.2004.005172     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Coulson, I. (2000) ‘Introduction: technological challenges for gerontologists in the 21st century’, Educational Gerontology, Vol. 26, pp.307–315.
2. Scanlon, B. (2001) ‘The future of the net: Surf’s up for seniors’, October 2001, Retrieved August 21, 2003, from http://www.eweek.com/paper2/0%2C3959%2C950787%2C00.asp
3. Coughlin, J.F. (1999) ‘Technology needs of aging boomers’, Issues in Science and Technology, Fall, pp.53–60.
4. Administration on Aging (2001) ‘A profile of older Americans: 2001’, Administration on Aging, Department of Health and Human Services, Retrieved July 8, 2003, from http://www.aoa.dhhs.gov/aoa/STATS/profile/2001/2001profile.pdf.
5. Zhao, H. (2001) ‘Universal usability web design guidelines for the elderly’, Universal Usability in Practices, Retrieved July 8, 2003, from http://www.otal.umd.edu/uupractice/elderly.
6. Czaja, S.J. and Lee, C.C. (2001) ‘The internet and older adults: design challenges and opportunities’, in Charness, N., Park, D.C. and Sabel, B.A. (Eds.): Communication, Technology, and Aging: Opportunities and Challenges for the Future, Springer Publishing Co., NY, pp.60–78.
7. Morrell, R.W., Dailey, S.R. and Echt, K.V. (2000) ‘Older adults and online information’, Presentation, Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Association of Americas, Washington, DC.
8. NIA and NLM (2001) Making your website senior-friendly: a checklist. National Institute on Aging & National Library of Medicine, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf
9. Morrell, R.W., Dailey, S.R., Feldman, C., Mayhorn, C.B. and Echt, K.V. (2002) ‘Older adults and information technology: a compendium of scientific research and website accessibility guidelines’, Bethesda, National Institute on Aging, MD.
10. American Foundation for the Blind (1999) Normal changes in the aging eye fact sheet, Retrieved July 9, 2003, from http://www.afb.org/info_document_view.asp?documentid=203.
11. Charness, N. (2001) ‘Aging and communication: human factors issues’, in Charness, N., Park, D.C. and Sabel, B.A. (Eds.): Communication, Technology, and Aging: Opportunities and Challenges for the Future, Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, pp.1–29.
12. Echt, K.V. (2002) ‘Designing web-based health information for older adults: visual considerations and design directives’, in Morrell, R.W. (Ed.): Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, pp.61–88.
13. Holt, B.J. and Morrell, R.W. (2002) ‘Guidelines for website design for older adults: the ultimate influence of cognitive factors’, in Morrell, R.W. (Ed.): Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, pp.109–132.
14. Strong, A.J., Walker, N. and Rogers, W.A. (2001) ‘Searching the World Wide Web: can older adults get what they need?’, in Rogers, W.A. and Fisk, A.D. (Eds.): Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older Adults, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, pp.255–269.
15. Rogers, W.A. (2000) ‘Attention and aging’, in Park, D.C. and Schwartz, N. (Eds.): Cognitive Aging: A Primer, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp.57–73.
16. Hawthorne, D. (2000) ‘Possible implication of aging for interface designers’, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp.507–528.
17. Ellis, R.D. and Kurniawan, S.H. (2000) ‘Increasing the usability of online information for older users: a case study in participatory design’, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.263–276.
18. Seidler, R. and Stelmach, G. (1996) ‘Motor control’, Encyclopedia of Gerontology: Age, Aging, and the Aged, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, pp.177–185.
19. Chaparro, A., Bohan, M., Fernandez, J.E., Choi, S.D. and Kattel, B. (1999) ‘The impact of age on computer input device use: psychophysical and physiological measures’, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 24, pp.503–513.
20. Walker, N., Millians, J. and Worden, A. (1996) ‘Mouse accelerations and performance of older computer users’, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, pp.151–154.
21. Kirsch, I., Yamamato, K., Norris, N., Rock, D., Jungeblut, A. and O’Reilly, P. (2001) Technical Report and Data File Users Manual for the 1992 National Adult Literacy Survey, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, NCES 2001-457, Washington, DC.
22. Brown, H., Prisuta, R., Jacobs, B. and Campbell, A. (1996) Literacy of Older Adults in America: Results from the National Adult Literacy Survey, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 97-576, Washington DC.
23. American Academy of Family Physicians (2002) ‘Patient education in your practice: a handbook for the office setting’, Retrieved October 2, 2002, from http://www.aafp.org/publications.
24. National Work Group on Literacy and Health (1998) ‘Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills’, The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 46, pp.168–175.
25. Doak, C., Doak, L. and Root, J. (1996) Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills, 2nd ed., J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, PA.
26. Gazmararian, J., Baker, D.W., Williams, M.V., Parker, R.M., Scott, T.L., Green D.C., Fehrenbach, S.N., Ren, J. and Koplan, J.P. (1999) ‘Health literacy among medicare enrollees in a managed care organization’, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 281, pp.545–551.
27. Kirsch, I., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L. and Kolstad, A. (1993) Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the National Adult Literacy Survey, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
28. Nielsen, J. and Tahir (2002) Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed, New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
29. Stowers, N.L. (2002) ‘The state of federal websites: the pursuit of excellence’, The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for The Business of Government, E-government Series.
30. Gant, J.P., Burley Gan, D. and Johnson, C.L. (2002) ‘State web portals: delivering and financing e-service’, The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for The Business of Government, E-government Series.
31. Dean, J. (2002) ‘Study says federal websites need to be easier to use’, Govexec.com newsletter, Retrieved August 21, 2003, from http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0302/030802j1.htm
32. Spool, J.M., Scanlon, T., Schroeder, W., Snyder, C. and DeAngelo, T. (1997) Website Usability: A Designer’s Guide, User Interface Engineering, North Andover, MA.
33. Rodrigues, N.J., Borges, J.A. and Morales, I. (1997) ‘Page design guidelines for improving www navigation’, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, San Francisco, CA, pp.277–278.
34. Borgess, J.A., Morales, I. and Rodriquez, N.J. (1998) ‘Page design guidelines developed through usability testing’, in Forsythe, C., Grose, E. and Ratner, J. (Eds.): Human Factors and Web Development, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, pp.137–154.
35. Mead, S.E., Lamson, N. and Rogers, W. (2002) ‘Human factors guidelines for website usability: health-oriented websites for older adults’, in Morrell, R.W. (Ed.): Older Adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Inc., Mahwah, NJ, pp.89–108.
36. Mead, S.E., Spaulding, V.A., Sit, R.A., Meyer, B. and Walker, N. (1997) ‘Effects of age and training on World Wide Web navigation strategies’, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, pp.152–156.
37. Meyer, B., Spaulding, V.A., Mead, S.E. and Walker, N. (1997) ‘Age group differences in World Wide Web navigation’, CHI 97 Electronic Publications, Retrieved August 20, 2003, from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/short-talk/bm.htm
38. Czaja, S.J. (1997) ‘Computer technology and the older adult’, in Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K. and Prabhu, P.V. (Eds.): Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd ed., Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp.797–812.
39. Assessments were conducted in July 2003.
40. Mead, S.E., Batsakes, P.J., Fisk, A.D. and Mykityshyn, A. (1999) ‘Application of cognitive theory to training and design solutions for age-related computer use’, International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 23, pp.553–573.
41. Qualls, C.D., Harris, J.L. and Rogers, W.A. (2001) ‘Cognitive-linguistic aging: considerations for home health care’, in Rogers, W.A. and Fisk, A.D. (Eds.): Human Factors Interventions for the Health Care of Older, Adults, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, pp.46–68.
42. Bernard, M., Liao, C. and Mills, M. (2001) ‘Determining the best online font for older adults’, Usability News 3.1., Retrieved August 20, 2003, from http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/3W/fontSR.htm.
43. Nielsen, J. and Coyne, P.K. (2002) ‘Web usability for senior citizens: 46 design guidelines based on usability studies with people age 65 and older’, Nielsen Normal Group Report.
44. Tullis, T.S., Boynton, J.L. and Hersh, H. (1995) ‘Readability of fonts in the windows environment’, Proceedings of CHI’95, Denver, CO, pp.127, 128.
45. The ReadMe tool is based on the author’s research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0203409. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this content are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
46. Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., Rogers, R.L. and Chissom, B.S. (1975) ‘Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, Fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel’, Research Branch Report 8-75, Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.
47. Kincaid, J.P. and McDaniel, W.C. (1974) An Inexpensive Automated Way of Calculating Flesch Reading Ease Scores, Patient Disclosure Document 031350, US Patent Office,Washington, DC.
48. Coleman, M. and Liau, T.L. (1975) ‘A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp.283–284.
49. Flesch, R. (1974) The Art of Readable Writing, Harper and Row, New York.