The fan of influence of streams and channel feedbacks to simulated land surface water and carbon dynamics

Water Resources Research

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 880-902

  Shen, Chaopeng ^a   Riley, William J ^b   Smithgall, Kurt R ^a   Melack, John M ^c   Fang, Kuai ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

channel land interaction; Community Land Model; drainage density; fan of influence of streams; wetlands inundation duration

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; CARBON; DYNAMICS; ECOLOGY; FLOODS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; SURFACE MEASUREMENT; SURFACE WATERS; WETLANDS;

CHANNEL REPRESENTATION; CHANNEL-LAND INTERACTION; COMMUNITY LAND MODELS; DEPTH TO WATER TABLES; DRAINAGE DENSITY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; LARGE SCALE SIMULATIONS; PHYSICALLY BASED MODELING;

RIVERS;

BASEFLOW; CARBON; CHANNEL FLOW; CHANNEL HYDRAULICS; DRAINAGE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; LAND SURFACE; OVERLAND FLOW; RIVER CHANNEL; STREAM; SURFACE WATER; WATER TABLE; WATERSHED; WETLAND;

EID: 84969332180     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018086     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Allen, G. H., and, T. M. Pavelsky, (2015), Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite-derived North American River Width data set, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 395-402, doi: 10.1002/2014GL062764.
2. Allen, W. B., (1977), Water information series report 2: Flowing wells in Michigan, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 2, 27 pp. [Available at http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/GIMDL-WIS02-216294-7.PDF, accessed 20 Nov. 2015.]
3. Beven, K., (2006), A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320 (1-2), 18-36, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007.
4. Bowling, L. C., D. L. Kane, R. E. Gieck, L. D. Hinzman, and, D. P. Lettenmaier, (2003), The role of surface storage in a low-gradient Arctic watershed, Water Resour. Res., 39 (4), 1087, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001466.
5. Bracken, L. J., J. Wainwright, G. A. Ali, D. Tetzlaff, M. W. Smith, S. M. Reaney, and, A. G. Roy, (2013), Concepts of hydrological connectivity: Research approaches, pathways and future agendas, Earth Sci. Rev., 119, 17-34, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.001.
6. Buchanan, B. P., K. Falbo, R. L. Schneider, Z. M. Easton, and, M. T. Walter, (2013), Hydrological impact of roadside ditches in an agricultural watershed in Central New York: Implications for non-point source pollutant transport, Hydrol. Processes, 27 (17), 2422-2437, doi: 10.1002/hyp.9305.
7. Camporese, M., C. Paniconi, M. Putti, and, S. Orlandini, (2010), Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data, Water Resour. Res., 46, W02512, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007536.
8. Carluer, N., and, G. De Marsily, (2004), Assessment and modelling of the influence of man-made networks on the hydrology of a small watershed: Implications for fast flow components, water quality and landscape management, J. Hydrol., 285 (1-4), 76-95, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.008.
9. Casanova, M. T., and, M. A. Brock, (2000), How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities?, Plant Ecol., 147 (2), 237-250, doi: 10.1023/A:1009875226637.
10. Clark, J. R., and, J. Benforado, (1981), Wetlands of bottomland hardwood forests, in Proceedings of a Workshop on Bottomland Hardwood Forest Wetlands of the Southeastern United States, pp. 1-401, Lake Lanier, Georgia, Elsevier, N. Y.
11. Clark, M. P., et al., (2015), Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5929-5956, doi: 10.1002/2015WR017096.
12. Curtis, P. S., P. J. Hanson, P. Bolstad, C. Barford, J. C. Randolph, H. P. Schmid, and, K. B. Wilson, (2002), Biometric and eddy-covariance based estimates of annual carbon storage in five eastern North American deciduous forests, Agric. For. Meteorol., 113 (1-4), 3-19, doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00099-0.
13. Desai, A. R., P. V. Bolstad, B. D. Cook, K. J. Davis, and, E. V. Carey, (2005), Comparing net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide between an old-growth and mature forest in the upper Midwest, USA, Agric. For. Meteorol., 128 (1-2), 33-55, doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.09.005.
14. Dorr, J. A., and, D. F. Eschman, (1970), Geology of Michigan, Univ. of Mich. Press, Ann Arbor.
15. Dunn, S. M., and, R. Mackay, (1996), Modelling the hydrological impacts of open ditch drainage, J. Hydrol., 179 (1-4), 37-66, doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02871-4.
16. Famiglietti, J. S., and, M. Rodell, (2013), Water in the balance, Science, 340 (6138), 1300-1301, doi: 10.1126/science.1236460.
17. Francipane, A., V. Y. Ivanov, L. V. Noto, E. Istanbulluoglu, E. Arnone, and, R. L. Bras, (2012), tRIBS-Erosion: A parsimonious physically-based model for studying catchment hydro-geomorphic response, Catena, 92, 216-231, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2011.10.005.
18. Goodrich, D. C., D. G. Williams, C. L. Unkrich, J. F. Hogan, R. L. Scott, K. R. Hultine, D. Pool, A. L. Goes, and, S. Miller, (2004), Comparison of methods to estimate ephemeral channel recharge, Walnut Gulch, San Pedro River Basin, Arizona, in Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment: The Southwestern United States, vol. 9, edited by, J. F. Hogan, F. M. Phillips, and, B. R. Scanlon, pp. 77-89, AGU, Washington, D. C.
19. Grimm, N. B., R. W. Sheibley, C. L. Crenshaw, C. N. Dahm, W. J. Roach, and, L. H. Zeglin, (2005), N retention and transformation in urban streams, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24 (3), 626-642, doi: 10.1899/04-027.1.
20. Groffman, P. M., N. J. Boulware, W. C. Zipperer, R. V. Pouyat, L. E. Band, and, M. F. Colosimo, (2002), Soil nitrogen cycle processes in urban riparian zones, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36 (21), 4547-4552.
21. Groffman, P. M., D. J. Bain, L. E. Band, K. T. Belt, G. S. Brush, J. M. Grove, R. V. Pouyat, I. C. Yesilonis, and, W. C. Zipperer, (2003), Down by the riverside: Urban riparian ecology, Front. Ecol. Environ., 1 (6), 315-321, doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0315:DBTRUR]2.0.CO;2.
22. Groffman, P. M., K. Butterbach-Bahl, R. W. Fulweiler, A. J. Gold, J. L. Morse, E. K. Stander, C. Tague, C. Tonitto, and, P. Vidon, (2009), Challenges to incorporating spatially and temporally explicit phenomena (hotspots and hot moments) in denitrification models, Biogeochemistry, 93 (1-2), 49-77, doi: 10.1007/s10533-008-9277-5.
23. Gunduz, O., and, M. M. Aral, (2005), River networks and groundwater flow: A simultaneous solution of a coupled system, J. Hydrol., 301 (1-4), 216-234, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.034.
24. Guo, H., Q. Hu, Q. Zhang, and, S. Feng, (2012), Effects of the Three Gorges Dam on Yangtze River flow and river interaction with Poyang Lake, China: 2003-2008, J. Hydrol., 416-417, 19-27, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.027.
25. GWIM (Groundwater Inventory and Mapping Project) (2014), State of Michigan Public Act 148 Groundwater Inventory and Mapping Project, IWR, Michigan State University. [Available at http://gwmap.rsgis.msu.edu/, accessed 11 Mar. 2014.]
26. Helton, A. M., G. C. Poole, R. A. Payn, C. Izurieta, and, J. A. Stanford, (2014), Relative influences of the river channel, floodplain surface, and alluvial aquifer on simulated hydrologic residence time in a montane river floodplain, Geomorphology, 205, 17-26.
27. Herwehe, J. A., K. Alapaty, T. L. Spero, and, C. G. Nolte, (2014), Increasing the credibility of regional climate simulations by introducing subgrid-scale cloud-radiation interactions, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 5317-5330, doi: 10.1002/2014JD021504.
28. Hoaglund, J. R., G. C. Huffman, and, N. G. Grannemann, (2002), Michigan basin regional ground water flow discharge to three Great Lakes, Ground Water, 40 (4), 390-405.
29. Ivanov, V. Y., E. R. Vivoni, R. L. Bras, and, D. Entekhabi, (2004), Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model, Water Resour. Res., 40, W11102, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003218.
30. Jencso, K. G., B. L. McGlynn, M. N. Gooseff, S. M. Wondzell, K. E. Bencala, and, L. A. Marshall, (2009), Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach- and plot-scale understanding to the catchment scale, Water Resour. Res., 45, W04428, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007225.
31. Ji, X., C. Shen, and, W. J. Riley, (2015), Temporal evolution of soil moisture statistical fractal and controls by soil texture and regional groundwater flow, Adv. Water Resour., 86, 155-169, doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.027.
32. Johnson, J. P. L., K. X. Whipple, L. S. Sklar, and, T. C. Hanks, (2009), Transport slopes, sediment cover, and bedrock channel incision in the Henry Mountains, Utah, J. Geophys. Res., 114, F02014, doi: 10.1029/2007JF000862.
33. Kim, J., A. Warnock, V. Y. Ivanov, and, N. D. Katopodes, (2012), Coupled modeling of hydrologic and hydrodynamic processes including overland and channel flow, Adv. Water Resour., 37, 104-126, doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.11.009.
34. Koster, R. D., M. J. Suarez, A. Ducharne, M. Stieglitz, and, P. Kumar, (2000), A catchment-based approach to modeling land surface processes in a general circulation model: 1. Model structure, J. Geophys. Res., 105 (D20), 24,809-24, 822, doi: 10.1029/2000JD900327.
35. Koven, C. D., W. J. Riley, Z. M. Subin, J. Y. Tang, M. S. Torn, W. D. Collins, G. B. Bonan, D. M. Lawrence, and, S. C. Swenson, (2013), The effect of vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry and alternate soil C and N models on C dynamics of CLM4, Biogeosciences, 10 (11), 7109-7131, doi: 10.5194/bg-10-7109-2013.
36. Krause, S., J. Jacobs, and, A. Bronstert, (2007), Modelling the impacts of land-use and drainage density on the water balance of a lowland-floodplain landscape in northeast Germany, Ecol. Modell., 200 (3-4), 475-492, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.08.015.
37. Lawrence, D. M., et al., (2011), Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 3, M03001, doi: 10.1029/2011MS000045.
38. Lawrence, D. M., K. W. Oleson, M. G. Flanner, C. G. Fletcher, P. J. Lawrence, S. Levis, S. C. Swenson, and, G. B. Bonan, (2012), The CCSM4 land simulation, 1850-2005: Assessment of surface climate and new capabilities, J. Clim., 25 (7), 2240-2260, doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00103.1.
39. Lesack, L. F. W., and, J. M. Melack, (1995), Flooding hydrology and mixture dynamics of lake water derived from multiple sources in an Amazon floodplain lake, Water Resour. Res., 31 (2), 329-345, doi: 10.1029/94WR02271.
40. Li, Q., A. J. A. Unger, E. A. Sudicky, D. Kassenaar, E. J. Wexler, and, S. Shikaze, (2008), Simulating the multi-seasonal response of a large-scale watershed with a 3D physically-based hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 357 (3-4), 317-336, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.024.
41. Liang, X., D. P. Lettenmaier, and, E. F. Wood, (1996), One-dimensional statistical dynamic representation of subgrid spatial variability of precipitation in the two-layer variable infiltration capacity model, J. Geophys. Res., 101 (D16), 21,403-21, 422, doi: 10.1029/96JD01448.
42. Lynch, R. E., (1992), Fundamental Solutions of 9-point Discrete Laplacians; Derivation and Tables, West Lafayette, IN. [Available at http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cstech/929.]
43. Maxwell, R. M., and, N. L. Miller, (2005), Development of a coupled land surface and groundwater model, J. Hydrometeorol., 6 (3), 233-247, doi: 10.1175/JHM422.1.
44. Maxwell, R. M., et al., (2014), Surface-subsurface model intercomparison: A first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks, Water Resour. Res., 50, 1531-1549, doi: 10.1002/2013WR013725.
45. McClain, M. E., et al., (2003), Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, Ecosystems, 6 (4), 301-312, doi: 10.1007/s10021-003-0161-9.
46. MDNR (2010), 2001 IFMAP/GAP Lower Peninsula Land Cover, Michigan Dep. Nat. Resour., Lansing, Mich. [Available at: http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/mgdl/?rel=thext&action=thmname&cid=5&cat=Land+Cover+2001.]
47. Meierdiercks, K. L., J. A. Smith, M. L. Baeck, and, A. J. Miller, (2010), Analyses of urban drainage network structure and its impact on hydrologic response, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 46 (5), 932-943, doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00465.x.
48. Milstein, R. L., (1987), Bedrock geology of southern Michigan: Geological Survey Division, scale= 1:500,000, Mich. Dep. Nat. Resour., Lansing, Mich. [Available at http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/state.php?state5MI, accessed 1 December 2015.]
49. Montanari, A., and, D. Koutsoyiannis, (2012), A blueprint for process-based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems, Water Resour. Res., 48, W09555, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011412.
50. NCDC (2014), National Climatic Data Center (NCDC): U.S. Daily Surface Data (COOP Daily/Summary of Day). [Available at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/ (Accessed 1 December 2015)].
51. NHD (2014), National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), United States Geol. Surv. [Available at http://nhd.usgs.gov/, accessed 1 December 2015.]
52. Niu, G.-Y., et al., (2011), The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, doi: 10.1029/2010JD015139.
53. Niu, J., and, M. S. Phanikumar, (2015), Modeling watershed-scale solute transport using an integrated, process-based hydrologic model with applications to cacterial fate and transport, J. Hydrol., 529 (1), 35-48, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.013.
54. Niu, J., C. Shen, S.-G. Li, and, M. S. Phanikumar, (2014), Quantifying storage changes in regional Great Lakes watersheds using a coupled subsurface-land surface process model and GRACE, MODIS products, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7359-7377, doi: 10.1002/2014WR015589.
55. Nykanen, D. K., and, E. Foufoula-Georgiou, (2001), Soil moisture variability and scale-dependency of nonlinear parameterizations in coupled land-atmosphere models, Adv. Water Resour., 24, 1143-1157.
56. Pau, G. S. H., G. Bisht, and, W. J. Riley, (2014), A reduced-order modeling approach to represent subgrid-scale hydrological dynamics for land-surface simulations: Application in a polygonal tundra landscape, Geosci. Model Dev., 7 (5), 2091-2105, doi: 10.5194/gmd-7-2091-2014.
57. Rempe, D. M., and, W. E. Dietrich, (2014), A bottom-up control on fresh-bedrock topography under landscapes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111 (18), 6576-6581, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404763111.
58. Richardson, M. C., B. A. Branfireun, V. B. Robinson, and, P. A. Graniero, (2007), Towards simulating biogeochemical hot spots in the landscape: A geographic object-based approach, J. Hydrol., 342 (1-2), 97-109, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.016.
59. Rigon, R., G. Bertoldi, and, T. M. Over, (2006), GEOtop: A distributed hydrological model with coupled water and energy budgets, J. Hydrometeorol., 7 (3), 371-388, doi: 10.1175/JHM497.1.
60. Riley, W. J., and, C. Shen, (2014), Characterizing coarse-resolution watershed soil moisture heterogeneity using fine-scale simulations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18 (7), 2463-2483, doi: 10.5194/hess-18-2463-2014.
61. Riley, W. J., Z. M. Subin, D. M. Lawrence, S. C. Swenson, M. S. Torn, L. Meng, N. M. Mahowald, and, P. Hess, (2011), Barriers to predicting changes in global terrestrial methane fluxes: Analyses using CLM4Me, a methane biogeochemistry model integrated in CESM, Biogeosciences, 8 (7), 1925-1953, doi: 10.5194/bg-8-1925-2011.
62. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., K. K. Caylor, and, A. Rinaldo, (2011), Metabolic principles of river basin organization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108 (29), 11,751-11,755, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107561108.
63. Rosgen, D. L., (1994), A classification of natural rivers, Catena, 22 (3), 169-199, doi: 10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9.
64. Schaap, M. G., F. J. Leij, and, M. T. van Genuchten, (2001), ROSETTA: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions, J. Hydrol., 251 (3-4), 163-176, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00466-8.
65. Schneiderman, E. M., T. S. Steenhuis, D. J. Thongs, Z. M. Easton, M. S. Zion, A. L. Neal, G. F. Mendoza, and, M. T. Walter, (2007), Incorporating variable source area hydrology into a curve-number-based watershed model, Hydrol. Processes, 21, 3420-3430.
66. Schuller, D. J., A. R. Rao, and, G. D. Jeong, (2001), Fractal characteristics of dense stream networks, J. Hydrol., 243 (1-2), 1-16, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00395-4.
67. Shen, C., (2009), A process-based distributed hydrologic model and its application to a Michigan watershed, PhD dissertation, Mich. State Univ., East Lansing.
68. Shen, C., and, M. S. Phanikumar, (2010), A process-based, distributed hydrologic model based on a large-scale method for surface-subsurface coupling, Adv. Water Resour., 33 (12), 1524-1541, doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.09.002.
69. Shen, C., J. Niu, and, M. S. Phanikumar, (2013), Evaluating controls on coupled hydrologic and vegetation dynamics in a humid continental climate watershed using a subsurface-land surface processes model, Water Resour. Res., 49, 2552-2572, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20189.
70. Shen, C., J. Niu, and, K. Fang, (2014), Quantifying the effects of data integration algorithms on the outcomes of a subsurface-land surface processes model, Environ. Modell. Software, 59, 146-161, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.006.
71. Shi, Y., K. J. Davis, C. J. Duffy, and, X. Yu, (2013), Development of a coupled land surface hydrologic model and evaluation at a Critical Zone Observatory, J. Hydrometeorol., 14 (5), 1401-1420, doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-12-0145.1.
72. Sulis, M., C. Paniconi, and, M. Camporese, (2011), Impact of grid resolution on the integrated and distributed response of a coupled surface-subsurface hydrological model for the des Anglais catchment, Quebec, Hydrol. Processes, 25 (12), 1853-1865, doi: 10.1002/hyp.7941.
73. Sun, Z., Q. Huang, C. Opp, T. Hennig, and, U. Marold, (2012), Impacts and implications of major changes caused by the Three Gorges Dam in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, China, Water Resour. Manage., 26 (12), 3367-3378, doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0076-3.
74. Tang, J. Y., W. J. Riley, C. D. Koven, and, Z. M. Subin, (2013), CLM4-BeTR, a generic biogeochemical transport and reaction module for CLM4: Model development, evaluation, and application, Geosci. Model Dev., 6 (1), 127-140, doi: 10.5194/gmd-6-127-2013.
75. Turner, D. P., D. Ritts, A. R. Jacobson, W. Wang, and, R. Nemani, (2014), NACP North American 8-km Net Ecosystem Exchange and Component Fluxes, 2004, http://daac.ornl.gov, Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. Distrib. Active Arch. Cent., Oak Ridge.
76. van der Ploeg, R., W. Bohm, and, M. Kirkham, (1999), On the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the law of the minimum, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63 (5), 1055-1062.
77. Vivoni, E. R., V. Y. Ivanov, R. L. Bras, and, D. Entekhabi, (2005), On the effects of triangulated terrain resolution on distributed hydrologic model response, Hydrol. Processes, 19 (11), 2101-2122, doi: 10.1002/hyp.5671.
78. Vivoni, E. R., D. Entekhabi, R. L. Bras, and, V. Y. Ivanov, (2007), Controls on runoff generation and scale-dependence in a distributed hydrologic model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11 (5), 1683-1701, doi: 10.5194/hess-11-1683-2007.
79. Wang, H., L. Jia, H. Steffen, P. Wu, L. Jiang, H. Hsu, L. Xiang, Z. Wang, and, B. Hu, (2012), Increased water storage in North America and Scandinavia from GRACE gravity data, Nat. Geosci., 6 (1), 38-42, doi: 10.1038/ngeo1652.
80. Weill, S., A. Mazzia, M. Putti, and, C. Paniconi, (2011), Coupling water flow and solute transport into a physically-based surface-subsurface hydrological model, Adv. Water Resour., 34 (1), 128-136, doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.10.001.
81. Whipple, K. X., and, G. E. Tucker, (1999), Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: Implications for height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research needs, J. Geophys. Res., 104 (B8), 17,661-17,674, doi: 10.1029/1999JB900120.
82. Wood, E. F., (1997), Effects of soil moisture aggregation on surface evaporative fluxes, J. Hydrol., 190, 397-412.
83. Wood, E. F., (1998), Scale analyses for land-surface hydrology, in Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology, edited by, G. Sposito, pp. 1-29, Cambridge Univ. Press, N. Y.
84. Wood, E. F., D. P. Lettenmaier, and, V. G. Zartarian, (1992), A land-surface hydrology parameterization with subgrid variability for general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 97 (D3), 2717-2728, doi: 10.1029/91JD01786.
85. Yager, R. M., (1993), Estimation of hydraulic conductivity of a riverbed and aquifer system on the Susquehanna River in Broome County, New York, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap., 2387, 49 pp. [Available at http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wsp2387.]
86. Zampieri, M., E. Serpetzoglou, E. N. Anagnostou, E. I. Nikolopoulos, and, A. Papadopoulos, (2012), Improving the representation of river-groundwater interactions in land surface modeling at the regional scale: Observational evidence and parameterization applied in the Community Land Model, J. Hydrol., 420-421, 72-86, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.041.