IP and open innovation: Theory and practice

International Journal of Technology Marketing

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 119-134

  Manzini, Raffaella ^a   Lazzarotti, Valentina ^a   Pellegrini, Luisa ^b  

^a CREMS Centre for Research on Health Economics Social and Health Care Management Carlo Cattaneo University LIUC   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Appropriability; Intellectual property; Intellectual property protection mechanisms; IP strategy; IPPMs; Italy; Open innovation; Patents; Technological collaborations; Trade secrets

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969262951     PISSN: 1741878X     EISSN: 17418798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJTMKT.2012.046903     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alexy, O., Criscuolo, P. and Salter, A. (2009) 'Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation?', MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp.71-77.
2. Amara, N., Landrya, R. and Traoré, N. (2008) 'Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge-intensive business services', Research Policy, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp.1530-1547.
3. Arora, A, Fosfuri, A. and Gambardella, A. (2001) Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
4. Arundel, A. (2001) 'The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation', Research Policy, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.611-624.
5. Bogers, M. (2011) 'The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations', European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.93-117.
6. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002) 'R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium', American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 4, pp.1169-1184.
7. Chiesa, V., Gilardoni, E. and Manzini, R. (2005) 'The valuation of technology in buy-cooperate-sell decisions', European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp.5-30.
8. Cohen, W.M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2002) 'R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States', Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp.1349-1367.
9. Dahlander, L. and Gann, D.M. (2010) 'How open is innovation', Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp.699-709.
10. de Faria, P. and Sofka, W. (2010) 'Knowledge protection strategies of multinational firms - a cross-country comparison', Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp.956-968.
11. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) 'Building theories from case study research', The Academy of Management Review, October, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.532-550.
12. Escher, J.P. (2003) 'Design and implementation of technology marketing organisations', in Tschirchy, H., Jung, H.H. and Savioz, P. (Eds.): Technology and Innovation Management on the Move, pp.215-228, Orell Fussil.
13. European Commission (2001) 'European Commission IPR (intellectual property rights) aspects of internet collaborations', European Commission, Brussels.
14. European Commission (2002) 'Expert group report on: role and strategic use of IPRs (intellectual property rights) in international research collaborations', European Commission, Brussels.
15. Gallini, N.T. (2002) 'The economics of patents: lessons from recent U.S. patent reform', Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.131-155.
16. Gilardoni, E. (2007) 'Basic approaches to patent strategy', International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.417-440.
17. Henkel, J. (2006) 'Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux', Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp.953-969.
18. Hertzfeld, H.R., Link, A. and Vonortas, N.S. (2006) 'Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships', Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp.825-838.
19. Hurmellina-Laukkanen, P.H., Sainio, L.M. and Jauhiainen, T. (2008) 'Appropriability regime for radical and incremental innovations', R&D Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp.278-289.
20. Kingston, W. (2001) 'Innovation needs patent reform', Research Policy, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp.403-423.
21. Kline, D. (2003) 'Sharing the corporate crown jewels', MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp.89-93.
22. Laursen, K. and Salter, A.J. (2006) 'My precious technology: the role of legal appropriability strategy in shaping innovative performance', Working paper, Tanaka Business School, Imperial College, London.
23. Lemley, M. (2002) 'Intellectual property rights and standard-setting organizations', California Law Review, Vol. 90, pp.1889-1980.
24. Levin, C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., Gilbert, R. and Griliches, Z. (1987) 'Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 3, pp.783-831.
25. Lichtenthaler, U. (2005) 'External commercialisation of knowledge: review and research agenda', International Journal of Management Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.231-255.
26. Lichtenthaler, U. (2006) 'External technology commercialisation as an alternative mode of technology marketing', International Journal of Technology Marketing, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.411-430.
27. Lichtenthaler, U. (2010) 'Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical study', International Journal of technology Management, Vol. 52, Nos. 3/4, pp.372-391.
28. Mehlman, S., Uribe-Saucedo, S., Taylor, R.P., Slowinsy, G., Carerras, E. and Arena, C. (2010) 'Best practices for managing intellectual assets in collaborations', Research Technology Management, January-February.
29. Murray, F. and Stern, S. (2007) 'Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis', Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp.648-687.
30. Pisano, G. and Teece, D. (2007) 'How to capture value from innovation: shaping intellectual property and industry architecture', California Management Review, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp.258-296.
31. Reitzig, M. (2004) 'Strategic management of intellectual property', MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp.35-40.
32. Slowinsky, G., Hummel, E., Kumpf, R., Gupta, A. and Gilmont, E.R. (2009) 'Protecting know how and trade secrets in collaborative R&D relationship', Research Technology Management, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp.30-38.
33. van de Vrande, V., Vanhaverbeke, W. and Gassmann, O. (2010) 'Broadening the scope of open innovation: past research, current state and future directions', Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 52, Nos. 3-4, pp.221-235.
34. Webster, E. and Jensen, P.H. (2009) 'Do patents matter for commericalization?', Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, Working Paper No. 03/09.
35. West, J. (2006) 'Does appropriability enable or retard open innovation?', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Yin, R.K. (2009) Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
37. Zhao, M. (2006) 'Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection', Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 8, pp.1185-1199.