Comparing Image Perception of Bladder Tumors in Four Different Storz Professional Image Enhancement System Modalities Using the íSPIES App

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 602-608

  Kamphuis, Guido M ^a   De Bruin, D Martijn ^a   Brandt, Martin J ^a   Knoll, Thomas ^b   Conort, Pierre ^c   Lapini, Alberto ^d   Dominguez Escrig, Jose L ^e   De La Rosette, Jean J M C H ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Sindelfingen Böblingen Medical Center   (Germany)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^e INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE ONCOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER TUMOR; FEMALE; GENERAL DEVICE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE APPLICATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL IMAGE; RETINA; STORZ PROFESSIONAL IMAGE ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM; UROTHELIUM; WHITE LIGHT; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOFTWARE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; OBSERVER VARIATION; SOFTWARE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; UROTHELIUM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84969257679     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0687     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden APM, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: A combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006;49: 466-465; discussion 475-7.
2. Brausi M, Collette L, Kurth K, Meijden AP Van Der, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, et al. Variability in the recurrence rate at first follow-up cystoscopy after TUR in stage Ta T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: A combined analysis of seven EORTC studies. Eur Urol 2002;41:523-531.
3. Zheng C, Lv Y, Zhong Q, Wang R, Jiang Q. Narrow band imaging diagnosis of bladder cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2012;110(11 Pt B):E680-E687.
4. Mowatt G, N'Dow J, Vale L, Nabi G, Boachie C, Cook J a, et al. Photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer compared with white light cystoscopy: Systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011;27:3-10.
5. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BWG, Compérat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscleinvasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: Update 2013. Eur Urol 2013;64:639-653.
6. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: The IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009;374: 1105-1112.
7. Steenbakkers R, Duppen J. Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: A ''Big Brother''evaluation. Radiother Oncol 2005;77:182-190.
8. Gravas S, Stenzl A. News from Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES). J Endourol 2014;28: 1253-1255.