Great uncertainty about small things

Nanotechnology Challenges: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 315-325

  Hansson, Sven Ove ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

ANALYTICAL TOOL; PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS; PUBLIC DEBATE;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84969247930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812773975_0015     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. Altmann, J.: 2001, Military Uses of Microsystem Technologies. Dangers and Preventive Arms Control, Agenda Verlag, Munster.
2. Hansson, S.O.: 1993, ‘The false promises of risk analysis’, Ratio, 6, 16-26.
3. Hansson, S.O.: 1996, ‘Decision-Making Under Great Uncertainty’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 26, 369-386.
4. Knight, F.H.: [1921] 1933, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
5. Kroes, P. & Meijers, A.: 2002, ‘The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts - presentation of a new research programme’, Techne, 6 (2).
6. Luce, R.D. & Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York.
7. Rechard, R.P.: 1999, ‘Historical Relationship Between Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal and Other Types of Risk Assessment’, Risk Analysis, 19 (5), 763-807.
8. Rosenberg, N.: 1995, ‘Why Technology Forecasts Often Fail’, Futurist, (July-August), 16-21.