What counts as a ‘social and ethical issue’ in nanotechnology?

Nanotechnology Challenges: Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 201-216

  Lewenstein, Bruce V ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

COUNTS-AS; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY; ETHICAL ISSUES; FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS; NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

EID: 84969211482     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812773975_0011     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Amato, I.: 1999, Nanotechnology: Shaping the World Atom by Atom. National Science and Technology Council, Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering, and Technology, Washington, DC.
2. Arnall, A.H.: 2003, Future Technologies, Today’s Choices: Nanotechnology, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics; A technical, political, and institutional map of emerging technologies, Greenpeace Environmental Trust, London.
3. Cobb, M.; Macoubrie J. & Hamlett, P.W.: 2004, Public Information, Development Scenarios and Public Deliberation of Nanotechnology. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
4. Colvin, V.L.: 2003, ‘The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials’, Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1166-1170.
5. Court, E.; Daar, A.S.; Martin, E.; Acharya, T. & Singer, P.A.: 2004, Will Prince Charles et al. diminish the opportunities of developing countries in nanotechnology? Nanotechweb.org, Institute of Physics Publishing, 28 January 2004 (cited 29 July 2004) [www.nanotechweb.org/articles/society/3/1/1 /1 ].
6. ETC Group: 2003, The Big Down: Atomtech - Technologies Converging at the Nanoscale, Winnipeg, Canada.
7. Jensen, R.; Thursby, J.G. & Thursby, M.C.: 2003, ‘Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: "The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with’", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1271-1300.
8. Joy, B.: 2000, ‘Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us’, Wired, 8 (April), 238-262.
9. Kohlstedt, S.G., Sokal, M. & Lewenstein, B.V.: 1999, The Establishment of Science in America: 150 Years of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
10. Lewenstein, B.; Radin, J. & Diels, J.: 2005 (in press), ‘Nanotechnology in the media: A preliminary analysis’, in: M.C. Roco & W.S. Bainbridge (eds.), Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology II: Maximizing Human Benefit. (Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop, December 3-5, 2003, Arlington, VA), National Science & Technology Council and National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
11. National Research Council: 1996, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
12. National Science Board: 2004, ‘Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding’, in: Science & Engineering Indicators - 2004, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
13. Nisbet, M.; Brossard, D. & Kroepsch, A.: 2003, ‘Framing Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Polities’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8 (2), 36-70.
14. Nisbet, M., & Lewenstein, B.V.: 2002, ‘Biotechnology and the American Media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999', Science Communication, 23, 359-391.
15. Radin, J.: 2003, Scientists in Government: Framing the Environmental and Societal Implications of Nanotechnology, Master’s thesis, Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
16. Roco, M.C. & Bainbridge, W.S.: 2005 (in press,), Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology II: Maximizing Human Benefit. (Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop, December 3-5, 2003, Arlington, VA), Washington, DC: National Science & Technology Council and National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
17. Roco, M.C, W.S. Bainbridge & U.S. National Science and Technology Council, Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science Engineering and Technology: 2001, Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht and Boston.
18. Royal Academy of Engineering and Royal Society: 2004, Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, London.
19. TAB: 2004, Summary of TAB working report № 92, Nanotechnology. Büro für Technikfolgenabschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag, Berlin.
20. Thursby, J.G. & Thursby, M.C: 2003, ‘University Licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act’, Science, 301, 1052.
21. Weiss, R.: 2004, ‘For Science, Nanotech Poses Big Unknowns’, Washington Post, 1 February, 1.
22. st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act, 108-153, S. 189.