Queer shamans: Autoarchaeology and neo-shamanism

World Archaeology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 252-262

  Wallis, Robert J ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Autoarchaeology; Avebury; Druids; Heritage Management; Neo Shamanism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84968904377     PISSN: 00438243     EISSN: 14701375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00438240050131225     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahmed, A. S. and Shore, C. N. 1995. Introduction: is anthropology relevant to the contemporary world? In The Future of Anthropology: Its Relevance to the Contemporary World (eds A. S. Ahmed and C. N. Shore). London: Athlone, pp. 12-45.
2. Bender, B. 1993. Stonehenge: contested landscapes (medieval to present day). In Landscape, Politics and Perspectives (ed. B. Bender). Oxford: Berg, pp. 245-80.
3. Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: Making Space. Oxford: Berg.
4. Blain J. and Wallis, R. J. in press. Between worlds and words: Contested narratives of gender, seidhr and ‘ergi’. Journal of Contemporary Religion.
5. Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds) 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Davies, P. 1997. Respect and reburial. The Druid’s Voice: The Magazine of Contemporary Druidry, 8(Summer): 12-13.
7. Davies, P. 1998-1999. Speaking for the ancestors: the reburial issue in Britain and Ireland. The Druid’s Voice: The Magazine of Contemporary Druidry, 9(Winter): 10-12.
8. Dowson, T. A. 1998. Homosexualitat, teortia queer i arqueologia. Cota Zero, 14: 81-7.
9. Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. P. (eds) 1996. Composing Ethnography: Alternative Forms of Qualitative Writing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
10. Favret-Saada, J. 1980. Deadly Words: Witchcraft in the Bocage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fischer, M. M. J. 1986. Ethnicity and the post-modern arts of memory. In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (eds J. Clifford and G. Marcus). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 194-223.
12. Gingell, C. 1996. Avebury: striking a balance. Antiquity, 70: 507-11.
13. Goulet, J-G. and Young, D. E. 1994. Theoretical and methodological issues: In Being Changed by Cross-cultural Encounters: The Anthropology of Extraordinary Experience (eds D. E. Young and J-G. Goulet). Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, pp. 298-335.
14. Halperin, D. M. 1995. Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Hammersley, M. 1992. What’s Wrong With Ethnography? Methodological Explorations. London: Routledge.
16. Harding, S. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
17. Harvey, G. 1997. Listening People, Speaking Earth: Contemporary Paganism. London: Hurst.
18. Harvey, G. and Hardman, C. (eds) 1995. Paganism Today: Wiccans, Druids, the Goddess and Ancient Earth Traditions for the Twenty-First Century. London: Thorsons.
19. Hassan, F. A. 1997. Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity, 71: 1020-5.
20. Jackson, A. (ed.) 1987. Anthropology at Home. London: Tavistock.
21. Jones, L. 1994. The emergence of the Druid as Celtic shaman. Folklore in Use, 2: 131-42.
22. Jones, L. 1998. Druid, Shaman, Priest: Metaphors of Celtic Paganism. Enfield Lock, Middx: Hisarlik Press.
23. Jones, P. and Matthews, C. (eds) 1990. Voices from the Circle: The Heritage of Western Paganism. Northampton: Aquarian.
24. Marcus, G. E. and Fischer, M. M. J. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Pomeroy, M. 1998. Avebury World Heritage Site Management Plan. London: English Heritage.
26. Rabinow, P. 1988. Beyond ethnography: anthropology as nominalism. Cultural Anthropology, 3/4: 355-64.
27. Reed-Danahay, D. E. 1997. Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg.
28. Salomonsen, J. 1999. Methods of compassion or pretension? Anthropological fieldwork in modern magical communities. The Pomegranate: A New Journal of Neo-Pagan Thought, 8: 4-13.
29. Sebastian, T. 1990. Triad /I\: the Druid knowledge of Stonehenge. In Who Owns Stonehenge? (eds C. Chippendale, P. Devereux, P. Fowler, R. Jones and T. Sebastian). Manchester: Batsford, pp. 88-119.
30. Strathern, M. 1987. The limits of auto-anthropology. In Anthropology at Home (ed. A. Jackson). London: Tavistock, pp. 16-37.
31. Turner, E. 1992. The reality of spirits. Revision, 15(1): 28-32.
32. Turner, E. 1994. A visible spirit form in Zambia. In Being Changed by Cross-Cultural Encounters: The Anthropology of Extraordinary Experience (eds D. E. Young and J-G. Goulet). Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, pp. 71-95.
33. Ucko, P. J. 1990. Foreword. In The Politics of the Past (eds P. Gathercole and D. Lowenthal). London: Unwin Hyman, pp. ix-xxi.
34. VanPool, C. S. and VanPool, T. L. 1999. The scientific nature of postprocessualism. American Antiquity, 64(1): 33-53.
35. Wallis, R. J. 1999a. Altered states, conflicting cultures: shamans, neo-shamans and academics. Anthropology of Consciousness, 10(2-3): 41-9.
36. Wallis, R. J. 1999b. Autoarchaeology and neo-shamanism: The socio-politics of ecstasy. PhD thesis, Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton.
37. Wylie, A. 1995. Alternative histories: epistemic disunity and political integrity. In Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings (eds P. R. Schmidt and T. C. Patterson). Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of America Research Press, pp. 255-72.
38. Young, D. E. and Goulet, J-G. 1994. Introduction. In Being Changed by Cross-Cultural Encounters: The Anthropology of Extraordinary Experience (eds D. E. Young and J-G. Goulet). Peter-borough, Ontario: Broadview Press, pp. 7-13.