Illegitimate civic participation: Supporting community activists on the ground

CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1694-1703

  Asad, Mariam ^a   Le Dantec, Christopher A ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civic Engagement; Community Computing; Public Participation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SCAFFOLDS;

CIVIC ENGAGEMENT; COMMUNITY COMPUTING; GAIN INSIGHT; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES (ICTS); INFORMATION PRACTICES; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 84968866073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2675133.2675156     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Agosto, D. and Abbas, J. High school seniors' social network and other ICT use preferences and concerns. Proc. ASIS&T '10, (2010), Article No. 65.
2. Asad, M., Fox, S., & Le Dantec, C.A. Speculative Activist Technologies. Proc. iConference, (2014), 229-243.
3. Becker, T. Rating the Impact of New Technologies on Democracy. Commun. ACM 44, 1 (2001), 39-43.
4. Best, M.L., Jones, K., Kondo, I., Thakur, D., Wornyo, E., and Yu, C. Post-conflict communications: The case of Liberia. Commun. ACM 50, 10 (2007), 33-39.
5. Best, M. and Kumar, R. Sustainability failures of rural telecenters: Challenges from the sustainable access in rural india (sari) project. In Information Technologies and International Development. ACM, (2008), 31-45.
6. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.A. Participatory design and "democratizing innovation." Proc. PDC. (2010), 41-50.
7. Caldeira, F., Monteiro, E., and Simões, P. Trust and reputation for information exchange in critical infrastructures. Proc. CRITIS 10, ACM, (2010), 140-152.
8. Carlisle, P. Transferring, Translating and Transforming: An Integrative Relational Approach to Sharing and Assessing Knowledge across Boundaries. Proc. CRITO. (2004).
9. Cohen, Joshua. "Deliberation and democratic legitimacy." Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy (1989): 342-360.
10. Dimond, J., Dye, M., Larose, D., and Bruckman, A. Hollaback!: The role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. Proc. CSCW, (2013), 477-490.
11. DiSalvo, C., Light, A., Hirsch, T., Le Dantec, C., Goodman, E. and Hill, K. HCI, communities, and politics. In CHI EA 10. ACM, (2010), 3151-3154.
12. DiSalvo, C., Nourbakhsh, I., Holstius, D., Akin, A. and Louw, M. The Neighborhood Networks Project: A Case Study of Critical Engagement and Creative Expression Through Participatory Design. Proc. PDC. ACM, (2008), 1975-1984.
13. Dombrowski, L., Voida, A., Hayes, G.R. and Mazmanian, M. The labor practices of service mediation: A study of the work practices of food assistance outreach. Proc CHI. ACM, (2012), 1977-1986.
14. Dourish, P. Implications for design. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2006), 541-550.
15. Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. In The Pacific Sociological Review. 18, 1 (Jan 1975), 122-136.
16. Evans-Cowley, J. Planning in the age of Facebook: The role of social networking in planning processes. GeoJournal. 75, (2010), 407-420.
17. Evans-Cowley, J. Planning in the Real-Time City: The Future of Mobile Technology. Journal of Planning Literature. 25, 2 (Nov. 2010), 136-149.
18. Fiorino, D. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 15. (1990), 226-243.
19. Fox, S. and Le Dantec, C.A. Community Historians: Scaffolding Community Engagement through Culture and Heritage. Proc. DIS. ACM, (2014), 785-794.
20. Friedman, B., Borning, A., Davis, J.L., et al. Laying the Foundations for Public Participation and Value Advocacy: Interaction Design for a Large Scale Urban Simulation. Proc. dg.o. ACM, (2008), 305-314.
21. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2003), 233-240.
22. Goecks, J., Voida, A., Voida, S. and Mynatt, E.D. Charitable Technologies: Opportunities for Collaborative Computing in Nonprofit Fundraising. Proc. CSCW. ACM, (2008), 689-698.
23. Ghassan, A. and Blythe, M. On legitimacy: designer as minor scientist. In CHI EA 13. ACM, (2013), 2149-2158.
24. Goldweber, M., Little, J.C., Cross, G., Davoli, R., Riedesel, C., von Konsky, B.R., and Walker, H. Enhancing the Social Issues Components in our Computing Curriculum: Computing for the Social Good. Proc. ITiCSE-WGR. ACM, (2010), 117-133.
25. Gordon, E. and Schirra, S. Playing With Empathy: Digital Role-Playing Games in Public Meetings. Proc. C&T. ACM, (2011), 179-185.
26. Gordon, E., Schirra, S. and Hollander, J. Immersive planning: A conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 38, (2011), 509-519
27. Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. The MIT Press, 1991.
28. Hakansson, M. and Sengers, P. Beyond being green: simple living families and ICT. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2013), 2725-2734.
29. Hirsch, T. 2009. Learning from activists: lessons for designers. interactions 16, 3 (2009).
30. Laird, F. Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making. Science, Technology & Human Values. 18, 3. (1993), 341-361.
31. Le Dantec, C.A. Legitimacy at the Outskirts: Categories, Use, and Adoption in Marginal Communities. Proc. UbiComp. ACM, (2009), 341-361.
32. Le Dantec, C.A., Farrell, R.G., Christensen, J.E., Bailey, M., Ellis, J.B., Kellogg, W.A. and Edwards, W.K. Publics in Practice: Ubiquitous Computing at a Shelter for Homeless Mothers. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2011), 1687-1696.
33. Le Dantec, C.A. and Edwards, W.K. Across Boundaries of Influence and Accountability: The Multiple Scales of Public Sector Information Systems. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2010), 113-122.
34. Le Dantec, C.A. and Edwards, W.K. The View from the Trenches: Organization, Power, and Technology at Two Nonprofit Homeless Outreach Centers. Proc. CSCW. ACM, (2008), 589-598.
35. Le Dantec, C.A., Christensen, J.E., Bailey, M., Farrell, R.G., Ellis, J.B., Danis, C.M., Kellogg, W.A., Edwards, W.K. A tale of two publics: democratizing design at the margins. Proc. DIS. ACM, (2010), 11-20.
36. Marsden, G. Designing Technology for the Developing World. interactions 13, 2 (2006).
37. Marsden, G , Maunder, A. and Parker, M. People Are People, but Technology is Not Technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 366, (Jul. 2008), 3795-3804.
38. McMillan, D.W. and Chavis, D.M. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology. 14, (1986).
39. McPhail, B., Costantino, T., Bruckmann, D., Barclay, R. and Clement, A. Caveat Exemplar: Participatory Design in a Non-Profit Volunteer Organisation. Proc. CSCW. ACM, (1998), 223-241.
40. Merkel, C., Farooq, U., Xiao, L., Ganoe, C., Rosson, M.B. and Carroll, J.M. Managing Technology Use and Learning in Nonprofit Community Organizations: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities. Proc. CHIMIT. ACM, (2007), Article No. 8.
41. Merkel, C.B., Xiao, L., Farooq, U., Ganoe, C.H., Lee, R., Carroll, J.M. and Rosson, M.B. Participatory Design in Community Computing Contexts: Tales from the Field. Proc. PDC. ACM, (2004), 1-10.
42. Mouffe, C. The Democratic Paradox. Verso, London, UK, 2005.
43. Saward, M. Less than meets the eye: democratic legitimacy and deliberative theory. Democratic Innovation. M. Saward, ed. Routledge, 2000, 66-77.
44. Silver-Greenberg, J. and Protess, B. "JPMorgan Reveals It Faces Criminal and Civil Inquiries." In The New York Times. (August 2013). Web. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/08/07/jpmorganreveals-it-faces-civil-And-criminalinquiries/?ref=business&-r=0&module=ArrowsNav&conte ntCollection=Business%20Day&action=keypress®ion=FixedLeft&pgtype=Blogs
45. Snellen, I. ICTs, Bureaucracies, and the Future of Democracy. Commun. ACM. 44, 1 (2001), 45-48.
46. Turner, F. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2006.
47. van Dijk, J. Models of Democracy and Concepts of Communication. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. K.L. Hacker and J. van Dijk, eds. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2000, 30-53.
48. York, D. and Zhengzin, X. Sharing the knowledge. Proc. CHI. ACM, (2011), 1007-1012.