What resources do CS1 students use and how do they use them?

Computer Science Education

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 165-182

  Postner, Lori ^a   Stevens, Reed ^b  

^a NASSAU COMMUNITY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84968607413     PISSN: 08993408     EISSN: 17445175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08993400500224252     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. rd SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, 34 (1): 43–47.
2. Bayman, P., and Mayer, R. E., 1983. A diagnosis of beginning programmers’ misconceptions of BASIC programming statements. Communications of the ACM, 26 (9): 677–679.
3. Blum, L., and Frieze, C., 2004. “ The evolving culture of computing ”. Retrieved November 1, 2004 from http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/∼lblum/PAPERS/TheEvolvingCSCulture.pdf
4. Bowers, J. W., 1986. Classroom communication apprehension: A survey. Communication in Education, 35: 372–378.
5. Bransford, J. D., and Schwartz, D. L., 1999. “ Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications ”. In Review of Research in Education, Edited by: Iran-Nejad, A., and Pearson, P. D., Vol. 24, 61–101. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
6. Brooks, R., 1990. Categories of programming knowledge and their application. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33: 241–246.
7. Ebrahimi, A., 1994. Novice programmer errors: Language constructs and plan composition. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 41 (4): 457–480.
8. Fassinger, P. A., 1995. Understanding classroom interaction: Students' and professors' contributions to students' silence. Journal of Higher Education, 66 (1): 82–96.
9. Geske, J., 1992. Overcoming the drawbacks of the large lecture class. College Teaching, 40 (4): 151–154.
10. Gleason, M., 1986. Better communication in large courses. College Teaching, 34 (1): 20–24.
11. Lave, J., and Wenger, E., 1991. “ Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation ”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Leung, H., 2003. Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning. Computer Science Education, 13 (2): 123–136.
13. Margolis, J., and Fisher, A., 2002. “ Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing ”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Nonnecke, B., and Preece, J., 2003. “ Silent participants: Getting to know lurkers better ”. In From Usenet to CoWebs: Interacting with Social Information Spaces, Edited by: Lueg, C., and Fisher, D., New York: Springer Verlag.
15. Postner, L., 2002. “ What's so hard about learning to program? A cognitive and ethnographic analysis of beginning programming students ”. University of Washington. Dissertation
16. Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., and Andrews, D., 2004. The top 5 reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Special Issue of Computers in Human Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 20 (2)
17. Rist, R. S., 1989. Schema creation in programming. Cognitive Science, 13 (3): 389–414.
18. Robins, A., Rountree, J., and Rountree, N., 2003. Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13 (2): 137–172.
19. Rogalski, J., and Samurçay, R., 1990. “ Acquisition of programming knowledge and skillsIn ”. In Psychology of Programming, Edited by: Hoc, J. -M., Green, T. R.G., Samurçay, R., and Gilmore, D. J., 157–174. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., and White, C., 1996. “ Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners ”. In Handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling, Edited by: Olson, D., and Torrance, N., London: Basil Blackwell.
21. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. M., 1997. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22. Sleeman, D., Putnam, R. T., Baxter, J., and Kuspa, L., 1988. “ An introductory Pascal class: A case study of students' errors ”. In Teaching and Learning Computer Programming: Multiple Research Perspectives, Edited by: Mayer, R. E., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Soloway, E., and Ehrlich, K., 1984. Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10 (5): 595–609.
24. Spohrer, J. C., and Soloway, E., 1986. Alternatives to construct-based programming misconceptions. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 17 (4): 183–191.
25. Stevens, R., 2000. Divisions of labor in school and in the workplace: Comparing computer and paper-supported activities across settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9 (4): 373–401.
26. Stevens, R., 2002. “ Keeping it complex in an era of big educationIn ”. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning II: Continuing the conversation, Edited by: Koschmann, T., Miyake, N., and Hall, R., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
27. Williams, L., and Kessler, R., 2000. All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kindergarten. Communications of the ACM, 43 (5): 108–144.
28. Williams, L., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Ferzli, M., and Miller, C., 2002. In support of pair programming in the Introductory Computer Science Course. Computer Science Education, 12 (3): 197–212.