ASSISTing exit decisions in software inspection

Proceedings - 13th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 1998

Volumn 1998-October, Issue , 1998, Pages 281-284

  Miller, J ^a   Macdonald, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; INSPECTION;

COMPUTER SUPPORT; DETECTING DEFECTS; EXIT DECISION; FUNDAMENTAL LIMITATIONS; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; SOFTWARE INSPECTION;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84968335669     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.1998.732677     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. B. W. Boehm. Software Engineering Economics. Englewood Coffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
2. L. Briand, K. El Emam, O. Laitengerger, and T. Fussbroich. Using simulation to build inspection efficency benchmarks for development projects. Technical report, International Software Engineering Network Technical Report, ISERN-97-21, 1997.
3. K. Burnham and W. Overton. Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika, 65, 1978.
4. A. Chao. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics, 45, 1987.
5. T. Gilb and D. Graham. Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley, 1993.
6. S.-M. Lee and A. Chao. Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapturemodels. Biometrics, 50:88-97, 1994.
7. J. Miller. Estimating the number of defects remaining in a document after software inspection. Technical report, University of Strathclyde, Dept. of Computer Science, EFoCS-32-98, 1998.
8. S. A. Vander and L. G. Votta. Assessing software designs using capture-recapturemethods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(11):1045-1054, 1993.