Bounding US electricity demand in 2050

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 105, Issue , 2016, Pages 215-223

  Schweizer, Vanessa J ^a   Morgan, M Granger ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bounding analysis; Climate change; Electricity demand; Energy demand; Long term projection

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC POWER UTILIZATION; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INVESTMENTS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BOUNDING ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY DEMANDS; ELECTRICITY INTENSITIES; ENERGY DEMANDS; LONG-TERM PROJECTION; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; TRANSPORTATION SECTOR;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY USE; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84968324835     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Barnett T.P., Pierce D.W., Hidalgo H.G., Bonfils C., Santer B.D., Das T., et al. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 2008, 319(5866):1080-1083. Feb 22.
2. Bess C.E. Nuclear Criticality Safety Bounding Analysis for the in-Tank-Precipitation (ITP) Process, Impacted by Fissile Isotopic Weight Fractions 1994, Westinghouse Savannah River Co, Aiken, SC, Report No.: WSRC-TR-94-004.
3. Brandwajn V., Lauby M.G. Complete bounding method for AC contingency screening. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1989, 4(2):724-729.
4. Bureau of Economic Analysis (US) National economic accounts [internet]. national economic accounts [cited 2008 Sep 6]. Available from. http://www.bea.gov/national/Index.htm.
5. Carter T.R., Jones R., Lu X., Bhadwal S., Conde C., Mearns L.O., et al. New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).
6. Casman E.A., Morgan M.G., Dowlatabadi H. Mixed levels of uncertainty in complex policy models. Risk Anal. 1999, 19(1):33-42.
7. Casman E.A., Ha-Duong M., Morgan M.G. Response to Sander Greenland's critique of bounding analysis. Risk Anal. 2004, 24(5):1093-1096.
8. Chandler M.C. Nuclear Criticality Safety Bounding Analysis for the In-Tank Precipitation (ITP) Process 2001, Savannah River Site, Report No.: WSRC-TR-93-171 Rev. 0.
9. Costello K. Electric-to-gas substitution: what should regulators do? [internet]. Report No.: NRRI 09-072009 2009, National Regulatory Research Institute, Available from: http://www.aga.org/our-issues/energyefficiency/Pages/NaturalGasinaSmartEnergySystem.aspx.
10. Dawes R. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World 1988, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Philadelphia.
11. Department of Energy (US) Office of energy efficiency & renewable energy. Energy intensity indicators [internet] [cited 2013 Oct 4]. Available from. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/analysis/eii_index.html.
12. Electric Power Research Institute Assessment of achievable potential from energy efficiency and demand response programs in the US (2010-2030). Report No.: 1016987 2009, Palo Alto.
13. 2 emissions by expanding end-use applications of electricity. Report No.: 1018871 2009, Palo Alto.
14. Energy Information Administration (US) Annual energy outlook 2008 with projections to 2030. Report No.: DOE/EIA-0383(2008) 2008, Washington, DC.
15. Energy Information Administration (US) Commercial buildings energy consumption survey (CBECS) [internet] [cited 2014 May 31]. Available from. http://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/index.cfm.
16. Energy Information Administration (US) Residential energy consumption survey (RECS) [internet] [cited 2014 May 31]. Available from. http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/index.cfm.
17. Energy Information Administration (US) Share of energy used by appliances and consumer electronics increases in U.S. homes [internet]. residential energy consumption survey (RECS). [cited 2013 Oct 4]. Available from:. http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/reports/2009/electronics.cfm.
18. Energy Information Administration (US) Annual energy outlook 2013 with projections to 2040. Report No.: DOE/EIA-0383 2013, Washington, DC.
19. Energy Information Administration (US). Annual energy review 2008 [internet] [cited 2009 Jul 4]. Available from:. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/contents.html.
20. Ferson S. Sensitivity analysis using probability bounding. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2006, 91(10-11):1435-1442.
21. Glaeser E.L. Housing hangover in the sun belt [internet]. economix blog. [cited 2010 Apr 11]. Available from:. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/build-it-and-they-will-come-housing-hangover-in-the-sun-belt/.
22. Green B.D., Nix R.G. Geothermal - The Energy Under Our Feet 2006, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (US), Golden, CO, Report No.: NREL/TP-840-40665.
23. Greenberger M. Caught Unawares: the Energy Decade in Retrospect 1983, Ballinger Publishing Co., Ann Arbor.
24. Greenland S. Bounding analysis as an inadequately specified methodology. Risk Anal. 2004, 24(5):1085-1092.
25. Ha-Duong M., Casman E.A., Morgan M.G. Bounding poorly characterized risks: a lung cancer example. Risk Anal. 2004, 24(5):1071-1084.
26. Harte J. Consider a Spherical Cow: a Course in Environmental Problem Solving 1988, University Science Books, 283p.
27. Hora S.C., Iman R.L. Comparison of Maximus/Bounding and Baynes/Monte Carlo for Fault Tree Uncertainty Analysis 1986, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, Report No.: SAND-85-2839.
28. Hu P.S., Reuscher T.R. Summary of Travel Trends: 2001 National Household Travel Survey 2004, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
29. Hutson S.S., Barber N.L., Kenny J.F., Linsey K.S., Lumia D.S., Maupin M.A. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000 2004, US Geological Survey, Report No.: 1268.
30. Karditsas P.J., Loughlin M.J. Bounding analysis of temperature excursions in accidents using finite element analysis. Fusion Eng. Des. 2001, 1053-1058. Nov;58-59.
31. Kaya Y. Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper Presented at: IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group; 1990; Paris 1990.
32. Koomey J.G. Turning Numbers into Knowledge: Mastering the Art of Problem Solving 2008, Analytics Press, 247 p. 2nd ed.
33. Lewis H.W., Budnitz R.J., Rowe W.D., Kouts H.J.C., Von Hippel F., Loewenstein W.B., et al. Risk assessment review group report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1979, 26(5):4686-4690.
34. Lloyd E.A., Schweizer V.J. Objectivity and a comparison of methodological scenario approaches for climate change research. Synthese 2014, 191:2049-2088.
35. Meehl G.A., Stocker T.F., Collins W.D., Friedlingstein P., Gaye A.T., Gregory J.M., et al. Global Climate Projections. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt (Eds.).
36. Morgan M.G. Viewpoint: the neglected art of bounding analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35(7):162A-164A. Apr.
37. Morgan M.G., Keith D.W. Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide. Clim. Chang. 2008, 90(3):189-215. Oct 1.
38. Nakicenovic N., Swart R., Alcamo J., Davis G., de Vries B., Fenhann J., et al. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York.
39. National Academy of Sciences (US)-National Academy of Engineering (US)-National Research Council (US) Real prospects for energy efficiency in the United States [internet]. prepublication copy [cited 2010 Mar 11]. Available from:. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12621.
40. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US) National climatic data center. US climate normals, 1971-2000 [internet] [cited 2010 Feb 19]. Available from. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/normals/usnormals.html.
41. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US) National climatic data center. Heating & cooling degree day data [internet] [cited 2009 Oct 28]. Available from. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/documentlibrary/hcs/hcs.html.
42. National Research Council (US) Desalination: A National Perspective. 2008, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
43. O'Neill B.C., Desai M. Accuracy of past projections of US energy consumption. Energ Policy 2005, 33:979-993.
44. Roberts S. Slump creates lack of mobility for americans. The New York times [internet]. Apr 23 [cited 2014 Jun 1]; Available from:. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/23/us/23census.html.
45. Samaras C., Meisterling K. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:3170-3176.
46. Schweizer V.J., Kriegler E. Improving environmental change research with systematic techniques for qualitative scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7(4):044011. Dec 1.
47. Sentz K., Ferson S. Probabilistic bounding analysis in the quantification of margins and uncertainties. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96(9):1126-1136.
48. Shiau C.-S.N., Samaras C., Hauffe R., Michalek J.J. Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic and environmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energ Policy 2009, 37:2653-2663.
49. Shlyakhter A.I., Kammen D.M., Broido C.L., Wilson R. Quantifying the credibility of energy projections from trends in past data: the US energy sector. Energ Policy 1994, 22:119-130.
50. Smil V. Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties 2003, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
51. Trabalka J.R., Kocher D.C. Bounding Analysis of Effects of Fractionation of Radionuclides in Fallout on Estimation of Doses to Atomic Veterans. 2007, Senes Oak Ridge, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN, Report No.: DTRA-TR-07-5.
52. United States Department of Transportation Bureau of transportation statistics. National transportation statistics 2008 [internet] [cited 2009 Jun 27]. Available from. http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/index.html.
53. US Census Bureau Interim state population projections [internet] [cited 2013 Sep 27]. Available from:. http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/state/projectionsagesex.html.
54. US Geological Survey Water use in the United States [internet] [cited 2009 Jul 27]. Available from:. http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/50years.html.
55. Wilkinson C.F. Crossing the Next Meridian: Land, Water, and the Future of the West 1992, Island Press, Covelo, CA.
56. Woodhouse C.A., Gray S.T., Meko D.M. Updated streamflow reconstructions for the upper Colorado river basin. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(5). May 1.
57. World Climate Research Programme Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (WCRP CMIP3) Bias corrected and downscaled WCRP CMIP3 climate projections [internet] [cited 2010 Feb 9]. Available from. http://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip3_projections/.