Uncertainty and intelligent information systems

Uncertainty and Intelligent Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-514

  Bouchon Meunier, Bernadette ^a   Marsala, Christophe ^a   Rifqi, Maria ^a   Yager, Ronald R ^b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b IONA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DECISION MAKING; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER BASED TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION AGGREGATION; INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LOGIC BASED SYSTEMS; NETWORK METHODS; SYSTEMS MODELING;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84967647325     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/6747     Document Type: Book

References (76)

1. M. Bengtsson and J. Schubert, Dempster-Shafer clustering using Potts spin mean field theory. Soft Computing,5(3), 215-228 (2001).
2. A. P. Dempster, A generalization of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B,30(2), 205-247 (1968).
3. R. Kennes, Computational aspects of the Mobius transformation of graphs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,22(2), 201-223 (1992).
4. C. Peterson and B. Soderberg, A new method for mapping optimization problems onto neural networks. International Journal of Neural Systems,1(1), 3-22 (1989).
5. J. Schubert, On nonspecific evidence. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,8(6), 711-725 (1993).
6. J. Schubert, Specifying nonspecific evidence. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,11(8), 525-563 (1996).
7. J. Schubert, Clustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence. In Intelligent Systems for Information Processing: From Representation to Applications, B. Bouchon-Meunier, L. Foulloy, R.R. Yager (Eds.), pp. 349-360, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
8. J. Schubert, Clustering belief functions based on attracting and conflicting metalevel evidence using Potts spin mean field theory. Information Fusion, 5(4), 309-318 (2004).
9. J. Schubert and H. Sidenbladh, Sequential clustering with particle filtering — estimating the number of clusters from data. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Fusion, paper A4-3, pp. 1-8, Philadelphia, USA (July 2005).
10. G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1976).
11. P. Smets and R. Kennes, The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence, 66(2), 191-234 (1994).
12. P. Smets, The canonical decomposition of a weighted belief. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2, pp. 1896-1901, Montreal, Canada (August 1995).
13. P. Smets, Personal communication (2000).
14. P. Smets, Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Information Fusion,8(4), 387-412 (2007).
15. F.Y. Wu, The Potts model.Reviews of Modern Physics,54(1), 235-268 (1982).
16. J. F. Baldwin, Support logic programming. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,1, 73-104 (1986).
17. R. Carnap, The Logical Foundations of Probability.University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1950).
18. B. R. Gaines, Fuzzy and probability uncertainty logics. Journal of Information and Control38, 154-169 (1978).
19. J. Gebhardt and R. Kruse, The context model: An integrating view of vagueness and uncertainty. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning9, 283-314 (1993).
20. I. R. Goodman, Fuzzy sets as equivalence classes of random sets. Fuzzy Set and Possibility Theory (ed. R. Yager), pp. 327-342 (1982).
21. I. R. Goodman, Some new results concerning random sets and fuzzy sets. Information Science,34, 93-113 (1984).
22. V. N. Huynh, Y. Nakamori, T. B. Ho and G. Resconi, A context model for fuzzy concept analysis based on modal logic. Information Sciences,160, 111-129 (2004).
23. A. Kyburg, When vague sentences inform: A model of assertability. Synthese, 124, 175-192 (2000).
24. J. Lawry, A voting mechanism for fuzzy logic. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,19, 315-333 (1998).
25. J. Lawry, A methodology for computing with words. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,28, 51-89 (2001).
26. J. Lawry, A framework for linguistic modelling. Artificial Intelligence,155, 1-39 (2004).
27. J. Lawry, Modelling and Reasoning with Vague Concepts, Springer (in Press) (2006).
28. H. T. Nguyen, On random sets and belief functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,65, 531-542 (1978).
29. H. T. Nguyen, On modeling of linguistic information using random sets. Information Science, 34, 265-274 (1984).
30. R. Parikh, Vague predicates and language games. Theoria (Spain),161(27), 97-107 (1996).
31. E. H. Ruspini, On the semantics of fuzzy logic. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 5 54-99 (1991).
32. L. A. Zadeh, The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Parts 1-3. Information Sciences,8, 9, 199-249, 301-357, 43-80 (1975, 1976).
33. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy logic = Computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,4 103-111 (1996).
34. L. A. Zadeh, Precisiated natural language (PNL). AI Magazine,25(3), 74-91 (2004).
35. T. Andreasen and O. Pivert, On the weakening of fuzzy relational queries. 8th Int. Symp. on Meth. for Intell. Syst., Charlotte, USA, pp. 144-151 (1994).
36. P. Bosc, A. HadjAli and O. Pivert, Towards a tolerance-based technique for cooperative answering of fuzzy queries against regular databases. 7th Int. Conf. CoopIS, LNCS3760, pp. 256-273 (2005).
37. P. Bosc, A. HadjAli and O. Pivert, Weakening of fuzzy relational queries: An absolute proximity relation-based approach. To appear in Journal of Math-ware and Soft Computing.
38. B. Bouchon-Meunier, Stability of linguistic modifiers compatible with a fuzzy logic. Uncertainty in Intelligent Systems, LNCS313, pp. 63-70 (1988).
39. M. de Calmes, D. Dubois, E. Hullermeier, H. Prade and F. Sedes, Flexibility and fuzzy case-based evaluation in querying: An illustration in an experimental setting. Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 11(1), 43-66 (2003).
40. D. Dubois, A. HadjAli and H. Prade, Fuzzy qualitative reasoning with words, in: Computing with Words (P. P. Wang, (ed).).
41. John Wiley & Son, Series of Books on Intelligent Systems, pp. 347-366 (2001).
42. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Inverse operations for fuzzy numbers. Proc. of IFAC Symp. on Fuzzy Info., Knowledge Repre. and Decision Analysis, pp. 391-395 (1983).
43. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibility Theory, Plenum Press (1988).
44. T. Gaasterland, Cooperative answering through controlled query relaxation. IEEE Expert,12(5), 48-59 (1997).
45. P. Godfrey, Relaxation in Web Search: A new paradigm for search by Boolean queries. Personal Communication(March 1998).
46. E. E. Kerre and M. de Cock, Linguistic modifiers: An overview. Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing, (Chen, Ying, Cai, (eds).), pp. 69-85 (1999).
47. I. Muslea, Machine learning for online query relaxation. 10th Int. Conf. of Knowledge and Discovery and Data Mining, KDD’2004, pp. 246-255 (2004).
48. J. Ozawa and K. Yamada, Cooperative answering with macro expression of a database. 5th Int. Conf. IPMU, Paris 4-8 July, pp. 17-22 (1994).
49. J. Ozawa and K. Yamada, Discovery of global knowledge in database for cooperative answering. 5th IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 849-852 (1995).
50. B. Solaiman and B. Dasarathy, Information fusion concepts from information elements definition to the application of fusion approaches. SPIE proceedings Series (SPIE Proc. Ser.) International Society for Optical Engineering Proceedings Series,385, 205-212 (2001).
51. G. Saporta, Data fusion and data grafting. International meeting on Nonlinear Methods and Data Mining, 38(2000).
52. D. Dubois, M. Grabisch, H. Prade and P. Smets, Using the transferable belief model and a qualitative possibility theory approach on an illustrative example: The assessment of the value of a candidate. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,16(11), 1245-1272 (Novembre 2001). BB.
53. A. Zemirline, L. Lecornu and B. Solaiman, Data mining system applied in endoscopic image base. Proceedings of ICTTA’06: International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications(2006).
54. S. Chauvin, Evaluation des theories de la decision appliquees a la fusion de capteurs en image satellitaire.PhD thesis. These de Doctorat d’Universite Nantes (1995).
55. L. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning ii. Information Sciences (Part 2),8(4), 301-357 (1975).
56. L. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Informations and Control,8, 338-353 (1965).
57. J. Bezdek, Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms (Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition). Springer, July (1981) URL. http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0306406713/citeulike-21.
58. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Combination of fuzzy information in the framework of possibility theory. In Data Fusion in Robotic and Machine Intelligence, pp. 481-505 (1992).
59. J. Cauvin, C. L. Guillou, B. Solaiman, M. Robaszkiewicz, P. L. Beux and C. Roux, Computer-assisted diagnosis system in digestive endoscopy. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine,7, 256-262 (2003).
60. R. Moore, Interval Analysis.Prentice-Hall (1966).
61. B. Hayes, A lucid interval. American Scientist,91(6), 484-488 (2003).
62. F. Benhamou and W. Older, Applying interval arithmetic to real, integer and Boolean constraints. Journal of Logic Programming,32(1), 1-24 (1997).
63. H. Collavizza, F. Delobel and M. Rueher, Comparing partial consistencies. Reliable Computing,1, 1-16 (1999).
64. L. Jaulin, M. Kieffer, O. Didrit and E. Walter, Applied Interval Analysis with Examples in Parameter and State Estimation, Robust Control and Robotics. Springer-Verlag (2001).
65. L. Krippahl and P. Barahona, Applying constraint programming to protein structure determination. Proc. CP’99, Vol. 1713. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 289-302 (1999).
66. P. Herrero, M. Sainz, J. Vehl and L. Jaulin, Quantified set inversion with applications to control. IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control Systems Design(2004).
67. M. Silaghi, D. Sam-Haroud and B. Faltings, Search techniques for nonlinear constraint satisfaction problems with inequalities. Vol. 2056. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 183-193 (2001).
68. J.-P. Merlet, Parallel Robots.Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000).
69. E. Kaucher, Uber Metrische und Algebraische Eigenschaften Einiger Beim Numerischen Rechnen Auftretender Raume.PhD thesis, Karlsruhe (1973).
70. S. Shary, A new technique in systems analysis under interval uncertainty and ambiguity. Reliable Computing,8(5), 321-418 (2002).
71. A. Goldsztejn, Definition et Applications des Extensions des Fonctions Reelles aux Intervalles Generalises.PhD thesis. Universite de Nice-Sophia Antipolis (2005).
72. SIGLA X, Modal intervals (basic tutorial). Applications of Interval Analysis to Systems and Control (Proceedings of MISC’99), pp. 157-227 (1999).
73. R. Kearfott, Standardized notation in interval analysis (2002).
74. J. Davenport and J. Heintz, Real quantifier elimination is doubly exponential. J. Symb. Comput.,5, 29-35 (1988).
75. C. Grandon and B. Neveu, A specific quantifier elimination for inner box test in distance constraints with uncertainties. Research Report 5883, INRIA, url http://www.inria.fr/rrrt/rr-5883.html(2006).
76. C. Grandon, Resolution de systemes d'equations de distance avec incertitudes (in English).PhD thesis. Universite de Nice-Sophia Antipolis (2007).