Learning environments in new contexts: Web-capable classrooms in Canada

Technology-Rich Learning Environments: A Future Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 133-156

  Zandvliet, David ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967596300     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812564412_0007     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Chionh, Y.H., & Fraser, B.J. (1998, April). Validation of the “What is Happening In This Class” questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
2. Dryden, M., & Fraser, B.J. (1996, April). Evaluating urban systemic reform using classroom learning environment instruments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New York.
3. Ehrenkrantz, E. (1999). Planning for Flexibility, Not Obsolescence. Available:http://www.designshare.com/Research/EEK/Ehrenkrantzl. htm.
4. Fraser, BJ. (1981). Test of Science Related Attitudes. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
5. Fraser, BJ. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 527-564). New York: Macmillan.
6. Fraser, B.J. (1998a). Science learning environments: Assessments, effects, and determinants. In BJ. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1-61). London: Kluwer.
7. Fraser, BJ. (1998b). Classroom environment instruments: Developments, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 1, 7-33.
8. Fraser, B.J., & Fisher, D.L. (1983a). Student achievement as a function of person-environment fit: A regression surface analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 89-99.
9. Fraser, B.J., & Fisher, D.L. (1983b). Use of actual and preferred classroom environment scales in person-environment fit research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 303-313.
10. Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, USA.
11. Fraser, B.J., Giddings, G.J., & McRobbie, CJ. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399-422.
12. Gardiner, W.L. (1989). Forecasting, planning, and the future of the information society. In P. Goumain (Ed.), High technology workplaces: Integrating technology, management, and design for productive work environments (pp. 27-39). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
13. Grandjean, E. (1988). Ergonomics in computerized offices. London: Taylor and Francis.
14. Khoo, H.S., & Fraser, BJ. (1997, April). The learning environments associated with computer application courses for adults in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
15. Kirby, C. (1999). Making demands. American School and University, 72 (4), 34a-34b.
16. Knirk, F. (1992). Facility requirements for integrated learning systems. Educational Technology, 32(9) 26-32.
17. National Center for Education Statistics (2000, Sept.). Teacher’s tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers, use of technology. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.
18. Resta, P. (1998). Collaborative technologies as a catalyst for changing teacher practices. Washington: US Department of Education.
19. Rice, M, & Wilson, E. (1999). How technology aids constructivism in the social studies classroom. Social Studies, 90, 28-34.
20. Straker, L., Harris C., & Zandvliet, D. (2000, Aug.). Scarring a generation of school children through poor introduction of IT in schools. Paper presented at the triennial meeting of the International Ergonomics Association.
21. Swanquist, B. (1998). Wire wise. American School and University, 71 (4), 32-34.
22. Teh, G., & Fraser, BJ. (1995a). Associations between student outcomes and geography classroom environment. International Journal of Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 4(1), 3-18.
23. Tèh, G., & Fraser, B.J. (1995b). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the psychosocial environment of computer- assisted learning classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 177-193.
24. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers & technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. ED386155
25. Walberg, H.J. (1991). Educational productivity and talent development. In BJ. Fraser & HJ. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 93-109). London: Pergamon.
26. Zandvliet, D., & Fraser, B.J. (1998, April). The physical and psychosocial environment associated with classrooms using new information technologies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
27. Zandvliet D.B. and Straker L. (2001, July). Physical and psychosocial ergonomic aspects of the learning environment in information technology rich classrooms. Ergonomics, 449, 838-857.