The politics of public money: Spenders, guardians, priority setters, and financial watchdogs inside the Canadian government

Politics of Public Money: Spenders, Guardians, Priority Setters, and Financial Watchdogs Inside the Canadian Government

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-371

  Good, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967048417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (215)

1. David A. Good, The Politics of Anticipation: Making Canadian Federal Tax Policy (Ottawa: School of Public Administration, Carleton University, 1980)
2. Douglas G. Hartle, The Revenue Budget Process of the Government of Canada: Description, Appraisal, and Proposals (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1982)
3. Geoffrey Hale, The Politics of Taxation in Canada (Toronto: Broadview Press, 2002).
4. Norman Ward, The Public Purse: A Study of Canadian Democracy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962)
5. Allan Maslove, Michael Prince, and G. Bruce Doern, Federal and Provincial Budgeting (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1986)
6. G. Bruce Doern, Allan M. Maslove, and Michael J. Prince, Public Budgeting in Canada: Politics, Economics and Management (Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1988)
7. Douglas G. Hartle, The Expenditure Budget Process of the Government of Canada: A Public Choice-Rent-Seeking Perspective (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1988)
8. Donald J. Savoie, The Politics of Public Spending in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1990)
9. Michael J. Prince, ‘Budgetary Trilogies: The Phases of Budget Reform in Canada,’ in Christopher Dunn, ed., The Handbook of Canadian Public Administration (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2002).
10. A.W. Johnson, ‘The Treasury Board of Canada and the Machinery of Government in the 1970s,’ Canadian Journal of Political Science 4, no. 3 (1971), 240-59
11. A.W. Johnson, ‘Planning, Programming and Budgeting in Canada,’ Canadian Public Administration 33, no. 24 (1973), 23-31
12. Richard Van Loon, ‘Stop the Music: The Current Policy and Expenditure Management System,’ Canadian Public Administration 24, no. 2 (1981), 175-99
13. ‘The Policy and Expenditure Management System in the Canadian Federal Government: The First Three Years,’ Canadian Public Administration 26, no. 2 (1983), 255-85
14. ‘Ottawa’s New Expenditure Process: Four Systems in Search of Co-ordination,’ in G.B. Doern, ed., How Ottawa Spends: The Liberals, the Opposition and Federal Priorities (Toronto: James Lorimer, 1983), 93-120
15. Ian Clark, ‘Restraint, Renewal and the Treasury Board Secretariat,’ Canadian Public Administration 37, no. 2 (Summer 1994), 209-48.
16. Aaron Wildavsky, The New Politics of the Budgetary Process (Boston: Scott, Foresman, 1988
17. Aaron Wildavsky, The Politics of the Budgetary Process, 2nd ed. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1974), 20-21.
18. Nicholas d’Ombrain, ‘Cabinet Secrecy,’ Canadian Public Administration 47, no. 3 (Fall 2004), 333.
19. Department of Finance, Advantage Canada: Building a Stronger Economy for Canada (Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2006), 34 and 12. Retrieved 23 January 2007 from www.fin.gc.ca/ec2006/plan/plc2e.html.
20. Department of Finance, Budget Plan 2007 (Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2007), 158. Retrieved 7 May 2007 from www.fin.gc.ca/2007/pdf/bp2007e.pdf.
21. Peter C. Newman, The Distemper of Our Times (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1968)
22. Denis Smith, The Gentle Patriot: A Political Biography of Walter Gordon (Edmonton: Hurtig Publishers, 1973)
23. Walter L. Gordon, A Political Memoir (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1977)
24. Stephen Azzi, Walter Gordon and the Rise of Canadian Nationalism (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1999).
25. The Finance Minister’s New Shoes, available online from www.parl.gc.ca/information/about/process/info/BudgetShoes.asp?lang=E&Hist=N.
26. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ‘24th Annual Meeting of OECD Session Budget officials: Annotation Agenda,’ retrieved 14 December 2006 from http://oecd.org/dataoecd/61/21/2633689.doc.
27. Allen Schick, The Changing Role of the Central Budget Office (Paris: OECD, 1997), 4.
28. Richard R. Allen and Daniel Tommasi, eds., Managing Public Expenditure: A Reference Book for Transitional Countries (Paris: OECD, 2001).
29. Jeffrey Rubin, ‘A Balanced Budget Isn’t Always Good Fiscal Sense,’ Globe and Mail, 2 September 2004, B8.
30. Wildavsky, The Politics of the Budgetary Process. The book was revised in 1974, 1979, and 1984.
31. Aaron Wildavsky, Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes (Boston: Little, Brown, 1975), 7.
32. Charles Lindblom, ‘The Science of Muddling Through,’ Public Administration Review 19 (Spring 1959), 79-88
33. Charles Lindblom with David Braybrooke, A Strategy of Decision (New York: Free Press, 1963).
34. Charles E. Lindblom and Edward J. Woodhouse, The Policy-Making Process (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993).
35. Wildavsky, The Politics of the Budgetary Process, 131-2.
36. Naomi Caiden and Aaron Wildavsky, Planning and Budgeting in Poor Countries (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1974).
37. Wildavsky, Budgeting
38. Hugh Heclo and Aaron Wildavsky, The Private Government of Public Money: Community and Policy Inside British Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974)
39. Louis M. Imbeau, ‘Guardians and Advocates in Deficit Elimination: Government Intervention in the Budgetary Process in Three Canadian Provinces,’ in Jurgen Kleist and Shawn Huffman, eds., Canada Observed: Perspectives from Abroad and from Within (New York: Peter Lang, 2000), 45-56.
40. Savoie, The Politics of Public Spending in Canada
41. Doern, Maslove, and Prince, Public Budgeting in Canada
42. David I. Dewar and David A. Good, ‘Great Books Revisited: Wildavsky on “Rescuing Budgeting from American Administration” and Heclo and Wildavsky on “Village Life in British Budgeting,”’ Canadian Public Administration 47, no. 1 (Spring 2004), 81-96.
43. Naomi Caiden and Joseph White, eds., Budgeting, Policy, Politics: An Appreciation of Aaron Wildavsky (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1995).
44. Aaron Wildavsky, How to Limit Government Spending (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).
45. Jeffrey L. Pressman and Aaron Wildavsky, Implementation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973), 143.
46. Aaron Wildavsky, The New Politics of the Budgetary Process (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman, 1988).
47. Heclo and Wildavsky, The Private Government of Public Money.
48. Sandford Borins and David A. Good, ‘Spenders and Guardians: A Budgetary Game of Mutual Adjustment,’ Institute of Public Administration of Canada Case Study 1.93 (Toronto: IPAC, 1977).
49. Donald J. Savoie, Breaking the Bargain: Public Servants, Ministers, and Parliament (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003).
50. Peter Aucoin and Donald J. Savoie, eds., Managing Strategic Change (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development, 1998).
51. Allen Schick, ‘From the Old Politics of Budgeting to the New,’ in Naomi Caiden and Joseph White, eds., Budgeting, Policy, Politics: An Appreciation of Aaron Wildavsky (New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions 1995).
52. Imbeau, ‘Guardians and Advocates in Deficit Elimination.’
53. Joanne Kelly and John Wanna, ‘Are Wildavsky’s Guardians and Spenders still Relevant? New Public Management and the Politics of Government Budgeting,’ in Lawrence Jones, James Guthrie, and Peter Steane, eds., Learning from International Public Management Reform (London: Elsevier and Oxford University Press, 2000), 598-614.
54. Robert B. Bryce, Maturing in Hard Times: Canada’s Department of Finance through the Great Depression (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1986).
55. Donald Savoie, Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999).
56. Richard French, How Ottawa Decides (Toronto: James Lorimer, 1980)
57. Colin Campbell S.J. and George J. Szablowski, The Superbureaucrats: Structure and Behaviour in Central Agencies (Toronto: Macmillan, 1979).
58. Allen Schick, ‘Does Budgeting Have a Future?’ OECD Journal of Budgeting 2, no. 2 (2002), 25.
59. Richard Van Loon, ‘Stop the Music: The Current Policy and Expenditure Management System,’ Canadian Public Administration 24, no. 2 (1981), 175-99
60. ‘The Policy and Expenditure Management System in the Canadian Federal Government: The First Three Years,’ Canadian Public Administration 26, no. 2 (1983), 255-85
61. ‘Ottawa’s New Expenditure Process: Four Systems in Search of Co-ordination,’ in G.B. Doern, ed., How Ottawa Spends: The Liberals, the Opposition and Federal Priorities (Toronto: James Lorimer, 1983), 93-120.
62. Evert A. Lindquist, ‘How Ottawa Plans: The Evolution of Strategic Planning,’ in Leslie A. Pal, ed., How Ottawa Spends, 2001-2002: Power in Transition (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2001), 61-93.
63. William A. Niskanen, Bureaucracy and Representative Government (Chicago: Aldine Atherton, 1971).
64. Andre Blais and Stephane Dion, eds., The Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat: Appraisal and Evidence (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1991).
65. Francois Simard, ‘Great Books Revisited: Self-interest in Public Administration: Niskanen and the Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat,’ Canadian Public Administration 47, no. 3 (Fall 2004), 406-11.
66. Robert E. Goodin, ‘Rational Politicians and Rational Bureaucrats in Washington and Whitehall,’ Public Administration 60, no. 1 (Spring 1982), 23-42.
67. William Niskanen, ‘A Reflection on Bureaucracy and Representative Government,’ in Blais and Dion, eds., The Budget Maximizing Bureaucrat, 16-17.
68. Jean Luc Migué and Gérard Bélanger. Migué and Bélanger, ‘Towards a General Theory of Managerial Discretion,’ Public Choice 17, no. 1 (March 1974), 27-47.
69. Sonja Sinclair, Cordial but Not Cosy: A History of the Office of the Auditor General (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1979), 17.
70. Government of Canada, Federal Accountability Action Plan (Ottawa: President of the Treasury Board, 2006), 13.
71. Paul G. Thomas, ‘The Past, Present and Future of Officers of Parliament,’ Canadian Public Administration 46, no. 3 (Fall 2003), 287-314.
72. David A. Good, The Politics of Public Management: The HRDC Audit of Grants and Contributions (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003)
73. Sharon L. Sutherland, ‘Biggest Scandal in Canadian History: HRDC Audit Starts Probity War,’ Critical Perspectives in Accounting 14, nos. 1-2, (2003), 187-224.
74. Lotte Jensen and John Wanna, ‘Conclusions: Better Guardians?’ in John Wanna, Lotte Jensen, and Jouke de Vries, eds., Controlling Public Expenditure: The Changing Role of Central Budget Agencies-Better Guardians? (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2003), 256.
75. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, ‘About Us,’ retrieved 14 December 2006 from www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/common/us-nous_e.asp.
76. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, ‘TBS Organization-Office of the Comptroller General,’ retrieved June 2004 from www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/organisation/com-con_e.asp.
77. W.L. White and J.C. Strick, Policy, Politics, and the Treasury Board in Canadian Government (Don Mills, ON: Science Research Associates Ltd., 1970).
78. Department of Finance, Tax Expenditures: Notes to the Estimates/Projections (Ottawa, 2004), available online from www.fin.gc.ca/taxexp/2004/taxexpnot04_1e.html.
79. Department of Finance, Tax Expenditures and Evaluations, 2004, retrieved June 2005 from www.fin.gc.ca/toce/2004/taxexp04_e.html.
80. Department of Finance, Federal Government Public Accounts, available online from http://fin.gc.ca/frt/2004/frt04_le.html
81. Roger S. Smith, Tax Expenditures: An Examination of Tax Incentives and Tax Preferences in the Canadian Federal Income Tax System (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1979).
82. Jennifer Smith, Federalism: The Canadian Democratic Audit (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004).
83. Expert Panel on Fiscal Equalization and Territorial Formula Financing, Achieving a National Purpose: Putting Equalization Back on Track (May 2006), available online from www.eqtffpfft.ca/english/EQTreasury/index.asp.
84. David Johnson, Thinking Government (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2002), 354-59
85. Gregory J. Inwood, Understanding Canadian Public Administration (Toronto: Pearson, 2004), 329-331
86. Kenneth Kernaghan and David Siegel, Public Administration in Canada, 2nd ed. (Scarborough, ON: International Thomson Publishing, 1999), 626-33
87. Government of Canada, Federal Budgetary Process, available online from www.edu.psc-cfp.gc.ca/tdc/learn-apprend/psw/hgw/how-gov4_e.htm#BM4_3.
88. Treasury Board of Canada, The Expenditure Management System of the Government of Canada (Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1995).
89. Peter Harder and Evert A. Lindquist, ‘Expenditure Management and Reporting in the Government of Canada: Recent Developments and Backgrounds,’ in Jacques Bourgault, Maurice Demers, and Cynthia Williams, eds., Public Administration and Public Management: Experiences in Canada (Quebec: Les Publications du Québec, 1997), 72-89
90. Evert A. Lindquist, ‘Citizens, Experts and Budgets: Evaluating Ottawa’s Emerging Budget Process,’ in Susan Phillips, ed., How Ottawa Spends, 1994-95: Making Change (Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1994), 91-128
91. Evert A. Lindquist, ‘Getting Results: Reforming Ottawa’s Estimates,’ in Leslie A. Pal, ed., How Ottawa Spends, 1998-99: Balancing Act: The Post-Deficit Mandate (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 1998), 153-90
92. Peter Aucoin and Donald Savoie, eds., Managing Strategic Change: Learning from Program Review (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development, 1998).
93. Eddie Goldenberg, The Way It Works: Inside Ottawa (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 2006), 153.
94. Richard D. French, How Ottawa Decides: Planning and Industrial Policy Making 1968-84, 2nd ed. (Toronto: James Lorimer, 1984)
95. G. Bruce Doern, ‘The Development of Policy Organizations in the Executive Arena,’ in G. Bruce Doern and Peter Aucoin, eds., The Structures of Policy-Making in Canada (Toronto: Macmillan, 1971), 39-78
96. Ian D. Clark, ‘Recent Changes in the Cabinet Decision-Making System in Ottawa,’ Canadian Public Administration 28, no. 2 (1985), 185-201.
97. Otto Brodtrick, ‘How Does an Auditor General’s Office See Itself?’ Canadian Public Administration 47, no. 2 (Summer 2004), 226.
98. Mark A. Covaleski and Mark W. Dirsmith, ‘The Budgetary Process of Power Politics,’ Accounting, Organizations and Society 11, no. 3 (1986), 197.
99. Sharon S. Sutherland, ‘The Politics of Audit,’ Canadian Public Administration 23, no. 1 (Spring 1986), 118-48.
100. Auditor General of Canada, Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons for the Fiscal Year Ending March 31 (Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services, 1976), 9.
101. Peter Aucoin, Auditing for Accountability: The Role of the Auditor General (Ottawa: Institute on Governance, 1998), 9.
102. Sharon Sutherland, ‘The Office of the Auditor General of Canada: Government in Exile?’ working paper 31, Queen’s University, School of Policy Studies, Kingston, ON, September 2002, 7.
103. Auditor General of Canada, ‘A Model for Rating Departmental Performance Reports,’ in Report of the Auditor General of Canada (Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2002), chap. 6.
104. Auditor General of Canada, Report of the Auditor General of Canada: Reflections on a Decade of Serving Parliament (Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2001), 26.
105. Auditor General of Canada, Report of the Auditor General of Canada: Rating Selected Departmental Performance Reports (Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2005), chap. 5.
106. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, ‘Office of the Auditor General of Canada,’ retrieved 14 December 2006 from www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/oag-bvg.nsf/html/menue.html.
107. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, ‘What Is Legislative Auditing?’ retrieved 14 December 2006 from www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/other.nsf/html/auqdn_lavg_e.html#33.
108. Mark H. Moore and Margaret Jane Gates, Inspectors-General: Junkyard Dogs or Man’s Best Friend? (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1986), 82
109. Office of the Auditor General of Canada, An Overview of the Federal Government’s Expenditure Management System, Expenditure Management System at the Government Centre, and Expenditure Management System in Departments, retrieved 11 December 2006 from www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/domino/reports.nsf/html/20061100ce.html.
110. Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada, Policy on Internal Audit (2005), retrieved December 2005 from www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/ia-vi/ia-vi_e.asp.
111. Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada, Backgrounder to Press Release: Government Reinforces Integrity of Audit and Oversight (21 October 2005), retrieved 2 December 2005 from www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/media/nr-cp/2005/1021_e.asp#BG.
112. Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada, Directive on Departmental Audit Committees (2005), retrieved December 2005 from www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/ia-vi/dac-cmv_e.asp.
113. Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada, Guidelines on the Responsibilities of Chief Audit Executive (2005) retrieved December 2005 from www.tbssct. gc.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/ia-vi/rcae-rdv_e.asp.
114. Tim O’Neill, Review of Canadian Federal Fiscal Forecasting: Processes and Systems, June 2005, retrieved September 2005 from www.fin.gc.ca/toce/2005/ONeil_e.html.
115. International Monetary Fund, Canada Selected Issues (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, 2005), 82, available online from www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2005/cro5116.pdf.
116. Mike Joyce, ‘The Canadian Federal Government’s Experience with Prudent Budget Planning,’ draft working paper, Queen’s University, School of Policy Studies, Kingston, ON, July 2006.
117. Paul Martin, testimony before the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities.
118. Don Drummond, ‘Do We Need Fiscal Rules?’ in Christopher Ragan and William Watson, eds., Is the Debt War Over? Dispatches from Canada’s Fiscal Frontline (Montreal: IRPP and McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2004), 315.
119. Bob Rae, From Protest to Power: Personal Reflections on a Life in Politics (Toronto: Viking, 1996), 194.
120. Michael Prince, ‘Tax Policy as Social Policy: Canadian Tax Assistance for People with Disabilities,’ Canadian Public Policy 27, no. 4, (2001), 487-501.
121. ‘Have Some Pity for the Taxpayer,’ Globe and Mail, 26 February 2005, A16.
122. Jim Stanford, ‘Federal Fiscal Forecasting Round 2: Post-Budget Update’ (prepared for the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance, 31 March 2005), 11.
123. Monty Solberg, ‘Dithering, Not Delivering on Their Commitments,’ Press Release, 24 February 2005.
124. Auditor General of Canada, Report of the Auditor General of Canada: Accountability of Foundations (Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2005).
125. Herman Bakvis, ‘The Knowledge Economy and Post-secondary Education: Federalism in Search of a Metaphor,’ in H. Bakvis and G. Skogstad, eds., Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
126. Peter Aucoin, ‘Independent Foundations, Public Money and Public Accountability: Whither Ministerial Responsibility as Democratic Governance?’ Canadian Public Administration 45, no. 1 (Spring 2003), 1-26.
127. Kevin Lynch, testimony before the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities.
128. Paul Martin, testimony before the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities.
129. Genevieve Tellier, Les dépenses des gouvernements provinciaux canadiens: L’influence des partis politiques, des élections, de l’opinion publique (Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 2005).
130. You have to tell people how you are going to pay for it. (Retrieved October 2005 from www.fcpp.org/main/publication_detail.php?PubID=585)
131. Harriet Jackson and Alison McDermott, ‘Health-care Spending: Prospects and Retrospect,’ Analytical Note (Ottawa: Department of Finance, Economic and Fiscal Policy Branch, 2004).
132. Steven Chase, ‘Liberal Spending Blitz Hits $19.5 Billion,’ Globe and Mail, 10 May 2005, A4.
133. Doern, Maslove, and Prince, Public Budgeting in Canada.
134. Kevin Lynch, testimony before the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities.
135. David A. Good, ‘Promises and Pitfalls: Experience in Collaboration between the Canadian Federal Government and the Voluntary Sector,’ Policy Analysis and Management 22, no. 1 (Winter 2003), 122-7.
136. G. Bruce Doern, ‘Tax Expenditure Decisions and the Budgetary Decision Process,’ in Neil Bruce, ed., Tax Expenditures and Government Policy (Kingston: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy, 1988), 105-22
137. Kenneth Woodside, ‘The Political Economy of Policy Instruments: Tax Expenditures and Subsidies in Canada,’ in Michael M. Atkinson and Marsha A. Chandler, eds., The Politics of Canadian Public Policy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983), 173-9
138. Barbara Wake Carroll, David Siegel, and Mark Sproule-Jones, eds., Classic Readings in Canadian Public Administration (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2005), 496-511
139. Aaron Wildavsky, ‘Keeping Kosher: The Epistemology of Tax Expenditures,’ Journal of Public Policy 5, no. 3 (1986), 413-31
140. John Wanna, ‘Invisible Hands? The Non-Budgeting of Tax Expenditures in Australia and Canada’ (paper presented at the Australasian Political Science Association Conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, 29 September-1 October 2003.
141. Paul Martin, testimony before the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities.
142. Edward Greenspon and Anthony Wilson-Smith, Double Vision: The Inside Story of the Liberals in Power (Toronto: Doubleday, 1996), 164.
143. Paul Martin, testimony before the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities.
144. Paul Martin, testimony before the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities.
145. Treasury Board Secretariat, Background on Modern Comptrollership, available online at www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/cmo_mfc/intro_e.asp.
146. Ian D. Clark and Harry Swain, ‘Distinguishing the Real from the Surreal in Management Reform: Suggestions for Beleaguered Administrators in the Government of Canada,’ Canadian Public Administration 48, no. 4 (Winter 2005), 453-76. Retrieved 30 December 2006 from www.gc.ca/grfx/docs/gomery_fromupm_e.pdf.
147. A.R. Elangovan and D. Shapiro, ‘Betrayal of Trust in Organizations,’ Academy of Management Review 23, no. 3 (1998), 547-66.
148. Carolyn Bennett, Deborah Grey, and Yves Morin, The Parliament We Want: Parliamentarians’ Views on Parliamentary Reform (Ottawa: Library of Parliament, 2003), 7.
149. Peter Aucoin and Mark D. Jarvis, Modernizing Government Accountability: A Framework for Reform (Ottawa: Canada School of Public Service, 2005).
150. Donald J. Savoie, Breaking the Bargain: Public Servants, Ministers, and Parliament (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003), 178.
151. Peter Dobell and Martin Ulrich, ‘Parliament’s Performance in the Budget Process: A Case Study,’ Policy Matters 3, no. 5 (May 2002).
152. Jonathan Malloy, ‘The House of Commons Under the Chrétien Government,’ in G. Bruce Doern, ed., How Ottawa Spends, 2003-2004 (Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2003).
153. Patrick N. Malcolmson and Richard Myers, The Canadian Regime (Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2002).
154. Paul G. Thomas, ‘The Past, Present and Future of Officers of Parliament,’ Canadian Public Administration 46, no. 3 (Fall 2003), 287-314.
155. Norman Ward, The Public Purse: A Study of Canadian Democracy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962).
156. Audrey Doerr, ‘Show Me the Money: Accountability of Government Expenditures,’ Canadian Public Administration 46, no. 2 (Summer 2003), 257-61.
157. Jonathan Malloy, ‘The Standing Committee on Public Accounts,’ Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities, Restoring Accountability: Research Studies, vol. 1 (Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2006), 63-100.
158. House of Commons, The Business of Supply: Completing the Circle of Control, Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs (Ottawa, December 1998).
159. Peter Dobell and Martin Ulrich, ‘Building Better Relations,’ Occasional Papers on Parliamentary Government, no. 13 (Ottawa: The Parliamentary Centre, 2002).
160. Gomery Inquiry, Restoring Accountability: Recommendations
161. Gomery Inquiry, ‘Parliament and Financial Accountability,’ in Restoring Accountability: Research Studies, vol. 1.
162. ‘Report of the Royal Commission on the Civil Service,’ Sessional Paper No. 29a (Ottawa: King’s Printer, 1908), 2.
163. W.F. Dawson, Procedure in the Canadian House of Commons (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962), 211.
164. Bennett, Grey, and Morin, The Parliament We Want, 13.
165. Allen Schick, ‘Can National Legislatures Regain an Effective Voice in Budget Policy?’ OECD Journal of Budgeting 2, no. 3 (2002), 15-43.
166. Peter Dobell and Martin Ulrich, ‘Parliament and Financial Accountability,’ in Gomery Inquiry, Restoring Accountability: Research Studies, vol. 1, 24.
167. Ian D. Clark and Harry Swain, ‘Distinguishing the Real from the Surreal in Management Reform: Suggestions for Beleaguered Administrators in the Government of Canada,’ Canadian Public Administration 48, no. 4 (Winter 2005), 453-76.
168. Jim McDavid, ‘Using Performance Reports: Findings from the Legislator Uses of Performance Reports Project’ (paper presented to the 25th Anniversary Conference of CCAF-FCVI, Ottawa, ON, 17-18 October 2005).
169. David A. Good, ‘Parliament and Public Money: Players and Police,’ Canadian Parliamentary Review 28, no. 1 (Spring 2005), 17-21.
170. Auditor General of Canada, Annual Report to the House of Commons, 1993 (Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1993), 19.
171. Adrienne Clarkson, Heart Matters (Toronto: Penguin, 2006).
172. Gomery Inquiry, Restoring Accountability: Recommendations, 79.
173. Wildavsky, The New Politics of the Budgetary Process, 397.
174. Rod Dobell, ‘Evaluation and Entitlements: Hartle’s Search for Rationality in Government,’ in Richard M. Bird, Michael J. Trebilcock, and Thomas A. Wilson, eds., Rationality in Public Policy: Retrospect and Prospect, A Tribute to Douglas G. Hartle (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1999), 79-107.
175. Treasury Board of Canada, The Operational Performance Measurement System of the Government of Canada (Ottawa: Treasury Board Canada, 1974).
176. A.W. Johnson, ‘The Treasury Board of Canada and the Machinery of Government in the 1970s,’ Canadian Journal of Political Science 4, no. 3 (1971), 240-59
177. ‘Planning, Programming and Budgeting in Canada,’ Canadian Public Administration 33, no. 24 (1973), 23-31.
178. Privy Council Office, Policy and Expenditure Management System: Envelope Procedures and Rules (Ottawa: Privy Council Office, 1980).
179. Richard VanLoon, ‘Ottawa’s New Expenditure Process: Four Systems in Search of Co-ordination,’ in G.B. Doern, ed., How Ottawa Spends: The Liberals, the Opposition and Federal Priorities (Toronto: James Lorimer, 1983), 93-120.
180. Treasury Board of Canada, Office of the Comptroller General, Guide on the Program Evaluation Function (Ottawa: Supply and Services, 1981).
181. Wildavsky, Budgeting, chap. 14, ‘Some Butterflies Were Caught, No Elephants Stopped: The Zero-Base Budget, a Precursor of PPBS,’ 278-96.
182. Herman Bakvis, Regional Ministers: Power and Influence in the Canadian Cabinet (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991).
183. David Wright, Special Operating Agencies-Autonomy, Accountability and Performance Measurement (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development, 1995), 7.
184. John Edwards, Looking Back from 2000 at Public Service 2000. Report prepared for the Office of the Auditor General (Ottawa, September 2000), 8.
185. Ian D. Clark, ‘Restraint, Renewal, and the Treasury Board Secretariat,’ Canadian Public Administration 37, no. 2 (1994), 112-31.
186. Kevin Lynch, ‘The Virtuous Cycle: The Canadian Experience in a G7 Context,’ Policy Options (October 2005), 63-7.
187. Treasury Board, Getting Government Right: A Progress Report (Ottawa: Treasury Board, 1996)
188. Treasury Board, Getting Government Right: Governing for Canadians (Ottawa: Treasury Board, 1997).
189. John Manley, ‘How Canada Slayed the Deficit Dragon and Created the Surplus,’ Policy Options (October 2005), 22.
190. Evert A. Lindquist, ‘Citizens, Experts and Budgets: Evaluating Ottawa’s Emerging Budget Process,’ in Susan Phillips, ed., How Ottawa Spends 1994-95: Making Change (Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1994), 91-128.
191. Evert A. Lindquist, Consultation and Budget Secrecy: Reforming the Process of Creating Revenue Budgets in the Canadian Federal Government (Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada, 1985).
192. Treasury Board, The New Expenditure Management System (Ottawa: Treasury Board, 1995).
193. Evert A. Lindquist, ‘How Ottawa Reviews Spending: Moving Beyond Adhocracy?’ in G. Bruce Doern, ed., How Ottawa Spends 2006-2007: In from the Cold, the Tory Rise and the Liberal Demise (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006), 185-207.
194. Joanne Kelly, ‘Pursuit of an Elusive Ideal: Review and Reallocation under the Chrétien Government,’ in G. Bruce Doern, ed., How Ottawa Spends 2003-2004: Regime Change and Policy Shift (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2003), 118-33.
195. Department of Finance, Government of Canada-Expenditure Review (February 2005), retrieved May 2005 from www.expenditurereviewexamendesdepenses. gc.ca/index_e.asp.
196. Department of Finance, ‘Expenditure Review for Sound Financial Management,’ Budget 2005, retrieved May 2005 from www.fin.gc.ca/budget05/booklets/bkexpe.htm.
197. Arthur Kroeger, ‘Speech to the Ontario Federal Council,’ Toronto, ON, 8 December 2006.
198. Government of Canada, Management in the Government of Canada: A Commitment to Continuous Change (Ottawa: The President of the Treasury Board, 2005)
199. Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada, Review of the Responsibilities and Accountabilities of Ministers and Senior Officials (Ottawa: The President of the Treasury Board, 2005)
200. Michael Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).
201. Alex Himelfarb, Tenth Annual Report to the Prime Minister on the Public Service of Canada (Ottawa: Privy Council Office, 2003), 1.
202. Christopher Hood, ‘Stabilization and Cutbacks: A Catastrophe for Government Growth Theory?’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 3, no. 1 (1991), 37
203. Geoffrey Blainey, The Causes of War (London: Macmillan, 1973).
204. Allen Schick, The Capacity to Budget (Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, 1990), 24.
205. Wildavsky, How to Limit Government Spending.
206. Garrett Hardin, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons,’ Science 162 (1968), 1243-8.
207. Kelly and Wanna, ‘Are Wildavsky’s Guardians and Spenders Still Relevant?’ 598-614.
208. Wildavsky, The New Politics of the Budgetary Process.
209. Michael Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
210. Allen Schick, ‘From the Old Politics of Budgeting to the New.’
211. Jeffrey Simpson, ‘Why Mr Red Has the Blues,’ Globe and Mail, 21 January 2006, F1, F4-F5.
212. Wanna, Jensen, and de Vries, eds., Controlling Public Expenditure.
213. Schick, The Capacity to Budget, 12.
214. Aaron Wildavsky, ‘A Budget for All Seasons? Why the Traditional Budget Lasts,’ Public Administration Review, no. 6 (November/December 1978), 501-9.
215. John Wanna and Stephen Bartos, ‘“Good Practice: Does It Work in Theory?” Australia’s Quest for Better Outcomes,’ in Wanna, Jensen, and de Vries, ed., Controlling Public Expenditure, 1-29.