Status Anxiety? The Rush for Family Recognition

Kinship Matters

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 47-65

  Bainham, Andrew ^a  

^a CHRIST S COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966993246     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. ATKIN, B, ‘New Zealand: From Parental Relocation, Rights and Responsibilities to “Relationship” Property’ in A Bainham (ed), The International Survey of Family Law, 2003 edition (Bristol, Family Law, 2003).
2. BAILEY, M, ‘Canada: Same-Sex Marriage, Faith-Based Arbitration, and Child and Spousal Support’ in A Bainham (ed), The International Survey of Family Law, 2006 edition (Bristol, Family Law, 2006).
3. BAINHAM, A, ‘International Adoption from Romania: Why the Moratorium Should Not be Ended’, (2003) 15 Child and Family Law Quarterly 223
4. BAINHAM, A, ‘Birthrights?' The Rights and Obligations Associated with the Birth of a Child’ in J Spencer and A Pedain, Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice (Oxford, Hart publishing, 2006).
5. BRIDGE, C and SWINDELLS, H, Adoption: The Modern Law (Bristol, Family Law, 2003).
6. BROBERG, P, ‘The Registered Partnership for Same-sex Couples in Denmark’ (1996) 8 Child and Family Law Quarterly 149.
7. CRETNEY, C, Family Law in the Twentieth Century: A History (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003).
8. CURRY-SUMNER, I, All’s well that ends registered?: The Substantive and private international law aspects of non-marital registered relationships in Europe (Mortsel, Intersentia, 2005).
9. DE BOTTON, A, Status Anxiety (London, Hamish Hamilton, 2004)
10. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Adoption: a New Approach: A White Paper (cm 5017, 2000).
11. ENGEL, M, ‘Stepfamily Tribulations under United States Laws and Social Policies’ in A Bainham (ed) The International Survey of Family Law, 2005 edition (Bristol, Family Law, 2005).
12. GLENNON, L, ‘Targeting the Exclusionary Impact of Family Law’ in M Maclean (ed), Family Law and Family Values (Oxford, Hart publishing, 2005).
13. HARPER, M, DOWNS, M, LANDELLS, K and WILSON, G, Civil Partnership: The New Law (Bristol, Family Law, 2005).
14. HENRICSON, C, and BAINHAM, A, The Child and Family Policy Divide: Tensions, Convergence and Rights (York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2005).
15. HOME OFFICE, Supporting Families: A Consultation Document (London, The Stationery Office, 1998).
16. LORD CHANCELLOR’S DEPARTMENT, Consultation Paper: The Law on Parental Responsibility for Unmarried Fathers (London, LCD, 1998).
17. OLDHAM, JT, ‘The United States: The Struggle for the Creation of a Status for Same-Sex Partners’ in A Bainham (ed), The International Survey of Family Law, 2006 edition (Bristol, Family Law, 2006).
18. PARKINSON, P, ‘Child Protection, Permanency Planning and Children’s Right to Family Life’ (2003) 17 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 147.
19. SCHRAMA, W, ‘The Netherlands: Reforms in Dutch Family Law during the course of 2001: Increased Pluriformity and Complexity’ in A Bainham (ed), The International Survey of Family Law, 2002 edition (Bristol, Family Law, 2002).
20. THOMPSON-AHYE, H, ‘A View of Some Aspects of Family Law in the Commonwealth of the Bahamas’ in A Bainham (ed), The International Survey of Family Law, 2005 edition (Bristol, Family Law, 2005).
21. WARMAN, A, and ROBERTS, C, Adoption and Looked after Children-an International Comparison (Oxford, Centre for Family Law and Policy, University of Oxford, 2003).
22. WELSTEAD, M, ‘Reshaping Marriage and the Family-The Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Civil Partnership Act 2004' in A Bainham (ed) The International Survey of Family Law, 2006 edition (Bristol, Family Law, 2006).
23. WINTEMUTE, R and ANDENAES, M, Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnerships (Oxford and Portland, Hart publishing, 2001).