The Kantian imperative: Humiliation, common sense, politics

The Kantian Imperative: Humiliation, Common Sense, Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-305

  Saurette, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966727905     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (311)

1. The Rule of St. Benedict, ed. Timothy Fry (Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 1981), 198-201.
2. William Ian Miller, Humiliation (New York: Cornell University Press), 160-1.
3. Kant, ‘Was 1st Aufklarung,’ AK 8:35
4. On History, ed. Lewis White Beck (New York: Macmillan, 1963), 3.
5. Rae Langston, Kantian Humility(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
6. Benedictus de Spinoza, Ethics (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992), 3:26
7. Aviahai Margalit, The Decent Society (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996)
8. Aviahai Margalit, Social Research 64:1 (Spring 1997)
9. Norbert Elias, The Germans (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989, 1997)
10. Tony Ortega, ‘Billion Dollar Bad Guys,’ Phoenix New Times, 24 September 1998. Available online at http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/issues/1998-09-24/feature.html; accessed 2 October 2003.
11. Tangney, Shame and Guilt, (New York: Guilford Press, 2002).
12. Baker, ‘US hopes to flush out Baathists.’
13. ‘Excursus II: Juliette or Enlightenment and Morality,’ in Dialectic of Enlightenment (New York: Continuum, 1982).
14. Kant, AK 5:74. Critique of Practical Reason, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 64.
15. Amy Gutmann, ‘Introduction,’ Multiculturalism (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992), 18.
16. AK 4:260; Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, ed. James Ellington (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976), 5.
17. A.C. Ewing, A Short Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967), 3.
18. Hannah Arendt, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. Ronald Beiner (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 10.
19. Rae Langston, Kantian Humility(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)
20. Kant, Aix.; Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Norman Kemp Smith (London: Macmillan, 1968), 8
21. Kant, Axi-xii: CPR, 9.
22. Adrian Piper, ‘Kant on the Objectivity of the Moral Law,’ in Reclaiming the History of Ethics, ed. Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman, and Christine Korsgaard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 240-69.
23. Otried Hoffe, Immanuel Kant (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994), 111.
24. Andrews Reath, ‘Introduction,’ Critique of Practical Reason, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), xi.
25. Kant, Knowledge and Human Interests (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971)
26. Kant, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1989)
27. Jurgen Habermas, ‘Philosophy as Stand-In and Interpreter,’ Moral Con-sciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990), 1, 2.
28. Habermas, ‘Metaphysics after Kant,’ Postmetaphysical Thinking (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), 13.
29. Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)
30. Kant, Aix; CPR, 8.
31. Lewis White Beck, Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), especially 410; extract, 6.
32. Kant, AK 4:115; Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. and ed. H.J. Patton (New York: Harper, 1964), 124.
33. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, What Is Philosophy? (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994)
34. Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994)
35. ‘International Relations’ Image of Collective Identity,’ International Journal of Peace Studies 5:1 (Spring, 2000).
36. Deleuze and Guattari, What Is Philosophy? chap. 2.
37. Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985), especially chapters 1-4.
38. Charles Taylor, ‘The Diversity of Social Goods,’ Philosophical Papers II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
39. AK 6:222; The Metaphysic of Morals, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996)
40. Alasdair MacIntyre, A Short History of Ethics (New York: MacMillan, 1966), 190.
41. Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).
42. Ian Hunter, Rival Enlightenments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
43. Ian Hunter, ‘Cultivation Wars: Philosophical Ascetics in Early Modern German Thought,’ Theory and Event 6:4 (May 2003).
44. John Christian Laursen, The Politics of Scepticism in the Ancients: Montaigne, Hume and Kant (New York: E.J. Brill, 1992), especially chaps 8 and 9 and 197-204.
45. Laursen, The Politics of Scepticism, 198.
46. Laursen, The Politics of Scepticism, 199.
47. Hume, A Treatise on Human Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), 457, 523, 553.
48. AK 8:35; ‘What is Enlightenment’ in On History, ed. Lewis White Beck (New York: Macmillan, 1963), 3.
49. Otried Hoffe, Immanuel Kant (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994)
50. Lewis White Beck, Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), 164, 165.
51. Deleuze, Difference and Repetition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 133.
52. Kant, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, B41.
53. J.B. Schneewind, The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 483
54. J.B. Schneewind, ‘Autonomy, Obligation and Virtue: An Overview of Kant’s Moral Philosophy,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Paul Guyer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 309.
55. Beck, Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason, especially chap. 11
56. Mary Gregor, Laws of Freedom (New York: Basil Blackwell, 1963)
57. Henry Allison, Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)
58. Henry Allison, ‘Morality and Freedom: Kant’s Reciprocity Thesis,’ in Immanuel Kant: Critical Assessments, ed. Ruth Chadwick (London: Routledge, 1992)
59. Christine Korsgaard, ‘Morality as Freedom,’ in Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered, ed. Yovel Yirmiyahn (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1989)
60. Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985)
61. Michael Sandel, ‘Introduction’ and ‘Response,’ Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
62. H. Lottenbach and S. Tenenbaum, ‘Hegel’s Critique of Kant in the Philosophy of Right,’ Kant Studien 86:2 (1995), 211-30.
63. Charles Taylor, ‘Kant’s Idea of Freedom,’ Philosophical Papers II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)
64. Steve Smith, ‘Defending Hegel from Kant,’ in Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. Howard Williams (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1992)
65. Paul Franco, ‘Hegel and Liberalism,’ Review of Politics 59 (1997), 831-60.
66. Schneewind, ‘Autonomy, Obligation and Virtue,’ 309.
67. Schneewind, The Invention of Autonomy, 484.
68. Schneewind, ‘Autonomy, Obligation and Virtue,’ 309, 309.
69. Schneewind, ‘Autonomy, obligation, virtue,’ 315-6.
70. ‘Korsgaard, ‘Morality as Freedom,’ 24.
71. ‘Korsgaard, ‘Morality as Freedom,’ 25.
72. ‘Korsgaard, ‘Morality as Freedom,’ 43-7
73. Schneewind, ‘Autonomy, Obligation and Virtue,’ 318.
74. Kant, AK 4:402; Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. and ed. H.J. Patton (New York: Harper, 1964), 70.
75. Kant, AK 4:440; Groundwork, 108
76. Kant, AK 4:453-4; Groundwork, 121.
77. Kant, AK 4:454; Groundwork, 122.
78. Kant, B780; CPR, 602.
79. Kant, B783; CPR, 622.
80. Kant, AK 4:260; Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics (Cambridge: Hackett, 1977), 5.
81. Kant, AK 4:277; Prolegomena, 21-2.
82. Kant, AK 4:259-60; Prolegomena, 5.
83. Kant, AK 4:371; Prolegomena, 110.
84. Kant, AK 4:397; Groundwork, 64-5.
85. Kant, AK 4:401; Groundwork, 69.
86. Kant, AK 4:463; Groundwork, 131.
87. Kant, AK 5:3-4; CprR, 3.
88. Kant, AK 5:31; CprR, 28-9
89. Kant, AK 5:46; CPrR, 41-2.
90. Allison, ‘Justification and Freedom in the Critique of Practical Reason’, in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. Eckart Forster (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), 115.
91. Allison, ‘Justification and Freedom,’ in Kant’s Transcendental Deductions, ed. Eckart Forster (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), 123.
92. Kant, AK 5:30; CPrR, 27.
93. Allison, ‘Morality and Freedom’, 305.
94. Kant Theory of Freedom, 213.
95. Kant, AK 5:145-6; CPrR, 121.
96. Kant, AK 5:143; CPrR, 119
97. The Use of Pleasure (New York: Vintage Books, 1990), 28.
98. W.E. Connolly, ‘Brain Waves, Transcendental Fields, and Techniques of Thought,’ Radical Philosophy, 94 (March/April 1999), 27.
99. Pierre Hadot, Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique (Paris: Etudes augusti-niennes, 1981).
100. Paul Rabbow, Paidagogia; die Grundlegung der abendldndischen Erziehungskunst in der Sokra-tik (Frankfurt: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1960).
101. Peter Brown, ‘The Rise and Function of the Holy Man in Late Antiquity,’ Journal of Roman Studies 61 (1971), 80-101.
102. Peter Brown, Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988)
103. Stephen Jaeger, The Envy of Angels (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994).
104. Andrew Cutro-fello, Discipline and Critique (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994).
105. Ian Hunter, Rival Enlightenments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
106. Kant. Paideia, Critical Inquiry 28:4 (Summer 2002), 908-29
107. Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (New York: Collins, 1985)
108. Alaisdair MacIntyre, Short History of Ethics (Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998)
109. Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
110. John Rawls, Theory of Justice (Boston: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999)
111. Robert B. Louden, ‘Kant’s Virtue Ethics,’ in Virtue Ethics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997)
112. Onora O’Neill, ‘Kant after Virtue,’ Inquiry 26 (1984), 387-405.
113. Hegel, Philosophy of Right, s. 15.
114. H. Lottenbach and S. Tanenbaum, ‘Hegel’s Critique of Kant in the Philosophy of Right,’ Kant Studien 86:2 (1995), 211-30).
115. Charles Taylor, ‘Kant’s Idea of Freedom,’ in Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)
116. Steve Smith, ‘Defending Hegel from Kant,’ in Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, ed. Howard Williams (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1992)
117. Paul Franco, ‘Hegel and Liberalism,’ Review of Politics 54:2 (1997), 831-60.
118. Alasdair McIntyre, After Virtue (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), 44
119. Michael Sandel, ‘Conclusion,’ in Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.
120. ‘Cross Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate,’ in Philosophical Arguments (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).
121. Habermas, ‘Morality and Ethical Life: Does Hegel’s Critique of Kant Apply to Discourse Ethics?’ in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990).
122. John Rawls, ‘Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,’ reprinted in Kant and Political Philosophy, ed. Ronald Beiner and William Booth (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993), 292.
123. Kant, ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,’ Journal of Philosophy 77 (Sept. 1980), 515-72
124. Kant, Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971) especially 251-7
125. Rawls, ‘Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,’ 292 (my emphasis).
126. Rawls, Theory of Justice, chap. 3.
127. AK 4:454. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. and ed. H.J. Paton (New York: Harper, 1964), 122.
128. Kant, AK 6:29; Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, ed. and trans. T.M. Greene and H. Hudson (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1960), 24.
129. George Di Giovanni, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 70.
130. Kant, AK 5:157; CPrR, 129-30.
131. Kant, AK 6:407-8. Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 166.
132. Kant, AK 5:147; CPrR, 122
133. Kant, AK 6:215-16; MoM, 9-10.
134. Kant, AK 6:50; RLR, 46.
135. Andrews Reath, ‘Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility: Respect for the Moral Law and the Influence of Inclination’, Kant Studien 80:3 (1989), 296.
136. Reath, ‘Moral Sensibility,’ 296, 297, 26, 300
137. Kant, AK 6:408; MoM, 166
138. Kant, AK 6:446; MoM, 196.
139. Kant, AK 6:387; MoM, 151.
140. Hunter, Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
141. Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985), 26
142. Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufman (New York: Vintage Books, 1989)
143. The Rule of St. Benedict, ed. Timothy Fry (Minnessota: Liturgical Press, 1981), 198-201.
144. Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)
145. Augustine, Confessions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
146. Brian Massumi, ‘The Autonomy of Affect,’ in The Deleuze Critical Reader, ed. Paul Patton (London: Blackwell, 1996).
147. Charles Taylor, ‘Self-Interpreting Animals’ and ‘The Concept of a Person,’ in Philosophical Papers I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)
148. Charles Taylor, ‘Interpretation and the Sciences of Man,’ in Philosophical Papers II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)
149. Aviahai Margalit, The Decent Society (Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press, 1996)
150. Kant, ‘regarding ourselves as independent: independent from the interests and attachments we may have at any moment, never identified by our aims but always capable of standing back to survey and assess and possibly to revise them’; Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 175.
151. ‘Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,’ Kant and Political Philosophy, ed. Ronald Beiner and William Booth (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993), 317.
152. Kant, AK 5:74; Critique of Practical Reason, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 64
153. Kant, AK 5:31, 6; CPrR, 28, 54.
154. Kant, AK 5:72; CPrR, 63.
155. Kant, AK 5:73; CPrR, 63.
156. Kant, AK 5:74; CPrR, 64.
157. Kant, AK 5:73; CPrR, 63.
158. Kant, AK 5:74; CPrR, 64.
159. Kant, AK 5:74; CPrR, 63.
160. Kant, AK 5:73; CPrR, 63.
161. Kant, AK 5:75; CPrR, 65.
162. Kant, AK 5:77; CPrR, 66.
163. Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufman (New York: Vintage Books, 1989)
164. Kant, AK 5:77; CPrR, 66-7.
165. Kant, AK 5:78; CPrR, 67.
166. Kant, AK 5:77; CPrR, 67.
167. Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals, III:19
168. Kant, Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1960).
169. Talal Asad, Genealogies of Religion (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993).
170. Kant, AK 6:485; Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 227.
171. The Rule of St. Benedict, 297, 201.
172. Asad, Genealogies of Religion, 78.
173. Miller, Humiliation, 160-1.
174. Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals, 3:20.
175. Miller, Humiliation, 130.
176. Difference and Repetition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 165-6.
177. Kant, The Educational Theory of Immanuel Kant, trans. and ed. E.F. Buchner (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1903), 11-20.
178. Buchner, Educational Theory, 17-20.
179. Munzel, ‘Menshenfreudschaft: Friendship and Pedagogy in Kant,’ Eighteenth-Century Studies 32:2 (1999), 247-59.
180. Kant, Uber Pedagogik, AK 9: 450-1
181. Kant, AK 9:446; Education, 11.
182. Kant, AK 9:492; Education, 108.
183. Kant, AK 9:445; Education, 9.
184. Kant, AK 9:483; Education, 89.
185. Kant, AK 9:482; Education, 87-8.
186. Kant, AK 9:443; Education, 6.
187. Kant, AK 9:446; Education, 12.
188. Kant, AK 6:479; MoM, 222.
189. J.B. Schneewind, The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 4.
190. Miller, Humiliation, chap. 5.
191. White, Sustaining Affirmation: The Strengths of Weak Ontology in Political Theory (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).
192. Johnston, Encountering Tragedy: Rousseau and the Project of Democratic Order (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999).
193. T. Adorno and M. Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment (New York: Continuum, 1993).
194. Jane Bennett, ‘Distributive Agency,’ Public Culture, forthcoming 2005.
195. Adorno and Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment.
196. Benedictus de Spinoza, Ethics (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992)
197. Thomas De Quincy, ‘The Last Days of Immanuel Kant,’ in The English Mail-Coach and Other Essays [New York: Dutton, 1961], 177.
198. Gilles Deleuze, Difference and Repetition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 135, 134.
199. William Connolly, Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995), 29.
200. ‘Metaphysics after Kant,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), 13.
201. ‘Themes in Postmetaphysical Thinking,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking, 31-5.
202. ‘Morality and Ethical Life: Does Hegel’s Critique of Kant Apply to Discourse Ethics?’ in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990).
203. ‘A Philosophical Profile,’ in Autonomy and Solidarity (London: Verso Press, 1992), 158.
204. ‘Discourse Ethics, Law and Sittlichkeit’, in Autonomy and Solidarity, ed. P. Dews (London: Verso, 1992), 247
205. ‘On the Pragmatic, The Ethical, and the Moral Employments of Practical Reason’, Justification and Application (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993)
206. Ciaran Cronin and Pablo De Greiff, ‘Editor’s Introduction,’ The Inclusion of the Other (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998).
207. Autonomy and Solidarity, 201.
208. ‘Postscript to Knowledge and Human Interests’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 3 (1973), 165.
209. Knowledge and Human Interests (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971), 202.
210. ‘Universal Pragmatics,’ in Communication and the Evolution of Society (Boston: Beacon Press, 1979), 1.
211. ‘Discourse Ethics,’ 67.
212. ‘The Unity of Reason in the Diversity of its Voices,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking, 115.
213. ‘Individuation through Socialization,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking, 162.
214. ‘Individuation through Socialization,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking, 186.
215. ‘Individuation through Socialization,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking, 191.
216. Kant, AK 5:35; Critique of Practical Reason, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 32.
217. Kant, AK 5:37; CprR, 34.
218. Kant, AK 5:79; CprR 68.
219. Kant, AK 6:400; Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 160.
220. ‘Discourse Ethics,’ 45.
221. Habermas, ‘Remarks on Discourse Ethics,’ in Justification and Application, 40.
222. ‘Lawrence Kohlberg and Neo-Aristotelianism,’ in Justification and Application, 122.
223. ‘Remarks on Discourse Ethics,’ 22.
224. W.E. Connolly, Why I’m Not a Secularist (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), 163, 175, 176.
225. What Is Philosophy? (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 107.
226. Nietzsche and Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 94
227. Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1989), 115.
228. Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking, 133.
229. Habermas, ‘Unity of Reason,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking, 145-6.
230. Habermas, ‘Unity of Reason,’ in Postmetaphysical Thinking, 141.
231. Charles Taylor, ‘Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State,’ Multiculturalism, ed. A. Gutmann (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994)
232. Charles Taylor, ‘The European Nation State: Its Achievements and Its Limitations. On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship,’ Ratio Juris 9:2 (1996), 125-37
233. Charles Taylor, ‘Multiculturalism and the Liberal State,’ Stanford Law Review 47 (May 1995), 849-53
234. Charles Taylor, ‘Remarks on Legitimation through Human Rights,’ Philosophy and Social Criticism 24:2/3 (1998), 151-71
235. Charles Taylor, The Postnational Constellation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
236. Charles Taylor, ‘Why Europe Needs a Constitution,’ New Left Review 11 (Sept/Oct 2001), 5-26
237. Charles Taylor, ‘Europe: plaidoyer pour une politique exterieure commun’ (with Jacques Derrida), Liberation, 31 May 2003.
238. ‘The European Nation State,’ 134.
239. Habermas, Derrida, ‘Europe: plaidoyer pour une politique exterieure commun.’
240. ‘The European Nation State,’ 133.
241. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N.K. Smith (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1965)
242. W.E. Connolly, ‘Brain Waves, Transcendental Fields and Techniques of Thought,’ Radical Philosophy 94 (March/April 1999), 27.
243. Berlin, ‘Introduction,’ Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism, ed. James Tully (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 1.
244. MacIntyre, ‘Critical Remarks on The Sources of the Self,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54:1 (1994), 187-90.
245. Michael Rosen, ‘Must We Return to Moral Realism?’ Inquiry 34:2 (1991), 183-94
246. Quentin Skinner, ‘Who Are “We”? Ambiguities of the Modern Self,’ Inquiry 34:2 (1991), 133-53.
247. White, Sustaining Affirmation (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000), 44.
248. Sources of the Self, 313.
249. ‘Comments and Replies,’ Inquiry 34:2 (June 1991), 237-54
250. ‘Reply to Commentators,’ in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54:1 (1994), 203-13.
251. Sources of the Self, 110-11
252. Taylor, ‘Theories of Meaning,’ 271.
253. ‘Diversity of Goods,’ in Philosophical Papers II, 244, 245
254. Daniel M. Weinstock, ‘The Political Theory of Strong Evaluation’ in Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism, ed. James Tully (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 173.
255. ‘Neutrality in Political Science,’ in Philosophical Papers II.
256. ‘Diversity of Goods,’ 237
257. ‘Diversity of Goods,’ 237-8.
258. Sources of the Self, 20
259. Sources of the Self, 4-5, 44
260. Taylor, ‘What is Human Agency,’ Philosophical Papers I.
261. ‘Rationality,’ Philosophical Papers II, 149.
262. Taylor, Sources of the Self, 499.
263. ‘Reply to Commentators,’ 209.
264. Hegel and Modern Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 94, 135, 139.
265. Ruth Abbey, Charles Taylor(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000)
266. Mark Redhead, Charles Taylor: Living and Thinking Deep Diversity (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002)
267. Nicholas Smith, Charles Taylor: Meaning, Morals and Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002)
268. ‘Introduction,’ Philosophical Papers I and II, 11.
269. ‘What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty,’ Philosophical Papers II, 216.
270. Taylor, ‘Validity of Transcendental Arguments,’ 26, 20, 22.
271. ‘Social Theory as Practice,’ Philosophical Papers II, 110.
272. Taylor, ‘Self-Interpreting Animals,’ in Philosophical Papers I, 67-8.
273. Sources of the Self, 27
274. ‘Interpretations and the Sciences of Man,’ in Philosophical Papers II, 39.
275. Hegel and Modern Society, 134.
276. Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992), 16, 17.
277. Taylor, ‘Foucault on Freedom and Truth,’ Philosophical Papers II, 181.
278. Sources of the Self, 72, 530 n.36.
279. Ethics of Authenticity, 31
280. ‘Diversity of Goods,’ 239.
281. Taylor, Sources of the Self, 48.
282. ‘Where You Come From,’ Pay Attention (Polygram Records, 2002).
283. ‘which we cannot ignore; ‘Politics of Recognition,’ Philosophical Arguments, 228.
284. ‘Liberal Politics and the Public Sphere,’ in Philosophical Arguments, 267-8.
285. William Connolly in Why I Am Not a Secularist (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).
286. ‘Why Do Nations Have to Become States?’ Reconciling the Solitudes (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1993)
287. Taylor, ‘Cross Purposes,’ in Philosophical Arguments, 198
288. Michael Enright on The Sunday Edition, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Radio 1, 9 March 2003. Accessed through the following website on 28 June 2004: http://www.cbc.ca/insite/THE_SUNDAY_EDITION/2003/3/9.html.
289. Foucault, ‘A Preface to Transgression,’ Language, Counter-memory, Practice (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977).
290. ‘Invoking Civil Society,’ in Philosophical Arguments, 223.
291. ‘Liberal Politics and the Public Sphere,’ in Philosophical Arguments, 285-6.
292. ‘Shared and Divergent Values,’ Reconciling the Solitudes, 183, 184.
293. Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2003), 100.
294. Antje Vollmer, ‘Immanuel Kant and Iraq: A Reply to Roger Scruton,’ www.openDemocracy.net, 1 April 2004
295. Paul Schroeder, ‘What Would Kant Say? Iraq: The Case against Preemptive War,’ American Conservative, 21 October 2002.
296. Roger Scruton, ‘Immanuel Kant and the Iraq War,’ www.openDemocracy.net, 19 February 2004.
297. Brian Orend, War and International Justice: A Kantian Perspective (Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2000), 90, 56.
298. Seymour Hersh, New Yorker
299. Danner, ‘The Logic of Torture.’
300. Kant, AK 6; Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Mary Gregor (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996).
301. Brian Orend, War and International Justice
302. ‘Power and Weakness,’ Policy Review 113 (June/July 2003)
303. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002, 3.
304. George W. Bush, introductory letter to The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002
305. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002, s. 2, 3.
306. Donald Kagan, Gary Schmitt, Thomas Donnelly, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, a report of the Project for the New American Century, released September 2000.
307. Peter Ford, ‘Europe Cringes at Bush “Crusade” against Terrorists,’ Christian Science Monitor, 19 September 2001.
308. ‘Letter to America,’ The Nation, 16 December 2002.
309. ‘Interpreting the Fall of a Monument,’ Constellations 10:3 (2003), 365.
310. Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2003), 30.
311. ‘Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace,’ in The Inclusion of the Other (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998), 199, 199-200.