Computationally efficient analysis of SMA sensory particles embedded in complex aerostructures using a substructure approach

ASME 2015 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, SMASIS 2015

Volumn 1, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Bielefeldt, Brent ^a   Hochhalter, Jacob ^b   Hartl, Darren ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; AIRCRAFT; AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURE; AIRFRAMES; CHARACTERIZATION; CRACK DETECTION; CRACKS; DAMAGE DETECTION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FATIGUE CRACK PROPAGATION; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; INTELLIGENT MATERIALS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; WINGS;

AIRCRAFT STRUCTURE; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; ELECTROMAGNETIC RESPONSE; SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS(SMA); SUBSTRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SUBSTRUCTURE APPROACHES;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 84966658958     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/SMASIS2015-8975     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Glaessgen, E. H., and Stargel, D., 2012. "The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles". In 53rd Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf. Special Session: Digital Twin, Honolulu, HI, US, pp. 1-14.
2. Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., and Spottswood, S. M., 2011. "Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin". International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2011.
3. Farrar, C. R., and Worden, K., 2007. "An introduction to structural health monitoring". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), pp. 303-315.
4. Cornell, S. R., Leser, W. P., Hochhalter, J. D., Newman, J. A., and Hartl, D. J., 2014. "Development and characterization of embedded sensory particles using multi-scale 3D digital image correlation". In ASME 2014 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. V002T02A010-V002T02A010.
5. Wallace, T. A., Smith, S. W., Piascik, R. S., Horne, M. R., Messick, P. L., Alexa, J. A., Glaessgen, E. H., and Hailer, B. T., 2010. Strain-detecting composite materials, January. US Patent App. 12/685, 280.
6. Leser, W. P., 2014. "Embedded shape memory alloy particles for the self-sensing of fatigue crack growth in an aluminum alloy.".
7. Patoor, E., Lagoudas, D. C., Entchev, P. B., Brinson, L. C., and Gao, X., 2006. "Shape memory alloys, part i: General properties and modeling of single crystals". Mechanics of materials, 38(5), pp. 391-429.
8. Oishi, R., and Nagai, H., 2005. "Strain sensors of shape memory alloys using acoustic emissions". Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 122(1), pp. 39-44.
9. Karaca, H., Karaman, I., Basaran, B., Chumlyakov, Y., and Maier, H., 2006. "Magnetic field and stress induced martensite reorientation in NiMnGa ferromagnetic shape memory alloy single crystals". Acta Materialia, 54(1), pp. 233-245.
10. Version, A., 2013. "6.13". Analysis Users Guide, Dassault Systems.
11. Wu, S.-C., and Haug, E. J., 1988. "Geometric non-linear substructuring for dynamics of flexible mechanical systems". International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 26(10), pp. 2211-2226.
12. Dougherty, J., Padovan, J., and Srivatsan, T., 1997. "Fatigue crack propagation and closure behavior of modified 1070 steel: finite element study". Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 56(2), pp. 189-212.
13. Sumi, Y., 1998. "Fatigue crack propagation and computational remaining life assessment of ship structures". Journal of marine science and technology, 3(2), pp. 102-112.
14. He, W., Liu, J., and Xie, D., 2014. "Numerical study on fatigue crack growth at a web-stiffener of ship structural details by an objected-oriented approach in conjunction with ABAQUS". Marine Structures, 35, pp. 45-69.
15. Rivers, M. B., and Dittberner, A., 2014. "Experimental investigations of the NASA common research model". Journal of Aircraft, 51(4), pp. 1183-1193.
16. Kenway, G. K., Martins, J. R., and Kennedy, G. J., 2014. "Aerostructural optimization of the common research model configuration". Group (ADODG), 6(7), pp. 8-9.
17. Broeren, A. P., Potapczuk, M. G., Riley, J. T., Villedieu, P., Möens, F., and Bragg, M. B., 2013. "Swept-wing ice accretion characterization and aerodynamics". AIAA Paper, 2824, p. 2013.
18. Vassberg, J. C., DeHaan, M. A., Rivers, S. M., and Wahls, R. A., 2008. "Development of a common research model for applied CFD validation studies". AIAA paper, 6919, p. 2008.
19. Lagoudas, D., Hartl, D., Chemisky, Y., Machado, L., and Popov, P., 2012. "Constitutive model for the numerical analysis of phase transformation in polycrystalline shape memory alloys". International Journal of Plasticity, 32, pp. 155-183.
20. Hartl, D. J., Chatzigeorgiou, G., and Lagoudas, D. C., 2010. "Three-dimensional modeling and numerical analysis of rate-dependent irrecoverable deformation in shape memory alloys". International Journal of Plasticity, 26(10), pp. 1485-1507.
21. NASA, 2014. Common Research Model (CRM) wingbox finite element models. On the WWW, March. URL http://commonresearchmodel.larc.nasa.gov.