Rituals of recognition: Ethnic minority marriages in British legal systems

Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy in Europe

Volumn 13, Issue , 2007, Pages 177-202

  Shah, Prakash ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966560282     PISSN: 15682749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (9)

1. An instance of such a refusal is provided by the immigration case of Basharat Hussain v Visa Officer, Islamabad [1991] Imm AR 182
2. FI and others (Bangladesh - presumptions - marriage - legitimacy.) Bangladesh [2005] UKIAT 00016 by reliance on Pearl and Menski (1998), and indeed has been recognised in earlier immigration cases
3. see McCabe v McCabe [1994] 1 FLR 410.
4. Another decision of some concern, Azad v ECO, Dhaka [2000] 1918688 (CA)
5. [2001] INLR 109, involved the status of the child of a third wife of a Bangladeshi man.
6. It is also reported as Al-Mudaris v Al Mudaris [2001] All ER (D) 288 (Feb).
7. Mahmud v Mahmud 1977 SLT (Notes) 77
8. and Akram v Akram 1979 SLT (Notes) 87.
9. Another case on point, also referred to, was Orlandi v Castelli 1961 SC 113.