Community and member state competence in external relations agreements of the EU

European Foreign Affairs Review

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 7-36

  O'Keeffe, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966550025     PISSN: 13846299     EISSN: 18758223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/eerr1999002     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. On competence, see D. McGoldrick, International Relations Law of the European Union (Longman, 1997)
2. ; I . Macleod, I.D. Hendry and Stephen Hyett, The External Relations of the European Communities (Clarendon Press, 1996);
3. G. Gaja, lntroduzione a1 diritto comunitario (Edizioni Laterza, 1996). See also N. Emiliou, 'The allocation of competences between the EC and its Member States in the sphere of external relations'
4. in N. Emiliou and D. O'Keeffe (eds.), The European Union and World Trade Law (Wiley, 1996).
5. See the brilliant and carefully measured analysis in J. Dutheil de la Rochere, 'L'ere des competence~partagCes I? propos de l'etendue des competences extCrieures de la CommunautC europeenne' (1995) Revue du Marchd commun et de I'Union europdenne 461 at 469.
6. Stein, 'External relations of the European Community: structure and process' 1 Academy of European Law (1990), 115-188 at 160.
7. 5' Joined Cases C-181191 and C-249191, European Parliament v. Council and Commission, [I9931ECR 1-3685.
8. Opinion 2/91, above note 3 at para. 8 referring to Art. 113 (Opinion 1/75, above note 27, and Case 41/76, Donckerwolcke v. Procureur de la RLpublique nu Tribunal de Grande Instance, Lille and Director General of Customs, [I9761 ECR 1921) and Art. 102 of the Act of Accession (Case 804179, Commission v. United Kingdom, above note 27).
9. Opinion 1/78 (International Agreement on Natural Rubber), [I9791 ECR 2871 at para. 35. Contrast the Court's statement that 'the exact nature of the division of powers is a domestic question in which third parties have no need to intervene': Ruling 1/78, above note 76 at para 35.
10. Io7 See in this sense Opinion of Advocate General La Pergola in Portugal v. Council, above note 18 at 6186.