메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 170-178

Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations

Author keywords

Economic evidence synthesis; Systematic review methods

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; LITERATURE; MODEL; SCIENTIST; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDITY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; ECONOMICS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

EID: 84966372812     PISSN: 17441595     EISSN: 17441609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (133)

References (17)
  • 1
    • 17144406073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An introduction to economic evaluation: what's in a name?
    • Hoch J, Dewa C. An introduction to economic evaluation: what's in a name? Can J Psychiatry 2005; 50: 159-66
    • (2005) Can J Psychiatry , vol.50 , pp. 159-166
    • Hoch, J.1    Dewa, C.2
  • 3
    • 68549101842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research methods & reporting. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
    • Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, et al. Research methods & reporting. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009. 339(b2)700. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.339 , Issue.B2 , pp. 700
    • Liberati, A.1    Altman, D.2    Tetzlaff, J.3
  • 5
    • 84944726773 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2014 edition. Adelaide, South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide;
    • Joanna Briggs Institute. Reviewers manual, 2014 edition. Adelaide, South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide; 2014
    • (2014) Reviewers manual
  • 6
  • 7
    • 84867456655 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2011 edition Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute;
    • Joanna Briggs Institute. Reviewers manual, 2011 edition. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2011
    • (2011) Reviewers manual
  • 10
    • 84966364021 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of economic perspectives and evidence in systematic review
    • Schemilt I, Mugford M, Vale L, et al., editors. Oxford: BMJ Publishing Group, Blackwood Publishing. Health care, social welfare, education and criminal justice
    • Anderson R, Schemilt I. The role of economic perspectives and evidence in systematic review. In: Schemilt I, Mugford M, Vale L, et al., editors. Chapter 3: evidence-based decisions and economics. Health care, social welfare, education and criminal justice. Oxford: BMJ Publishing Group, Blackwood Publishing; 2010
    • (2010) Chapter 3: evidence-based decisions and economics
    • Anderson, R.1    Schemilt, I.2
  • 11
    • 76149089524 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Utility or futility?
    • Anderson R. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Utility or futility? Health Econ (19): 2010:350-64
    • (2010) Health Econ , Issue.19 , pp. 350-364
    • Anderson, R.1
  • 14
    • 0030056579 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party
    • Drummond M, Jefferson T. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ 1996; 313: 275-83
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.313 , pp. 275-283
    • Drummond, M.1    Jefferson, T.2
  • 15
    • 18544369908 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria
    • Evers S, Goosen M, de Vet H, et al. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21: 240-5
    • (2005) Int J Technol Assess Health Care , vol.21 , pp. 240-245
    • Evers, S.1    Goosen, M.2    de Vet, H.3
  • 16
    • 84886943201 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment
    • Philips Z, Ginnely L, Schulper M, et al. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. Health Tech Assess 2004; 8: 36
    • (2004) Health Tech Assess , vol.8 , pp. 36
    • Philips, Z.1    Ginnely, L.2    Schulper, M.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.