Cellular automata modeling approaches to forecast urban growth for adana, Turkey: A comparative approach

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 153, Issue , 2016, Pages 11-27

  Berberoğlu, Süha ^a   Akin, Anil ^b   Clarke, Keith C ^c  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BURSA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Logistic regression; Regression tree,; SLEUTH; Urban modeling

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; CELLULAR NEURAL NETWORKS; FORESTRY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; MARKOV CHAINS; ROBOTS;

ACCURACY MEASURES; CELLULAR AUTOMATA MODELING; COMPARATIVE APPROACH; REGRESSION TREES; REMOTELY SENSED IMAGES; SLEUTH; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN MODEL;

URBAN GROWTH;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CALIBRATION; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ACQUISITION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FORECASTING METHOD; IMAGERY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

ADANA [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84966271573     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Akin A., Clarke C.K., Berberoğlu S. The impact of historical exclusion on the calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2014, 27:156-168.
2. Akin A. Assessing different remote sensing techniques to detect land use/cover changes in coastal zone of Çukurova Deltas 2007, Department of Landscape Architecture, Cukurova University.
3. Almeida C.M., Gleriani J.M. Cellular automata and neural networks as a modeling framework for this simulation of urban land use change. Anais XII simpósio brasileiro de sensoriamento remoto 2005, 3697-3705.
4. Almeida C.M., Gleriani J.M., Castejon E.F., Soares-Filho B.S. Using neural networks and cellular automata for modeling intra-urban land-use dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2008, 22(9):943-963.
5. Alphan H. Land-use change and urbanization of Adana Turkey. Land Degradation & Development 2008, 14:575-586.
6. Altan T., Artar M., Atik M., Cetinkaya G. Cukurova delta biosphere reserve project. EU life third countries TCY 99/TR/087 2004, Cukurova University, Department of Landscape Architecture, Adana, Turkey.
7. Arsanjani J., Helbich M., Kainz W., Darvishi A. Integration of logistic regression: markov chain and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion-the case of Tehran. International Journal of Applied Earth Observationand. Geoinformation 2013, 21:265-275.
8. Batty M., Xie Y. From cells to cities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1994, 21:531-548.
9. Batty M. Urban models. Quantitative geography: a british view 1981, 181-191. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. N. Wrigley, R.J. Bennett (Eds.).
10. Berberoğlu S., Lloyd C.D., Atkinson P.M., Curran P.J. The integration of spectral and textural information using neural networks for land cover mapping in the Mediterranean. Computers and Geosciences 2000, 26:385-396.
11. Bian L., Walsh S.J. Scale dependencies of vegetation and topography in mountainous environment of Montana. Professional Geographer 1992, 45:1-11.
12. Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R.A., Stone C.J. Classification and regression trees 1984, Wadsworth Belmont.
13. Claggett P., Jantz C.A., Goetz S.J., Bisland C. Assessing development pressure in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: an evaluation of two land-use change models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2004, 94:129-146.
14. Clarke K., Gaydos C. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 1998, 12:699-714.
15. Clarke K.C., Hoppen S., Gaydos L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environmental and Planning B 1997, 24:247-261.
16. Clarke K.C. Mapping and modeling land use change: an application of the SLEUTH model. Landscape analysis and visualization: spatial models for natural resource management and planning 2008, 353-366. Springer, Berlin. C. Pettit, W. Cartwright, I. Bishop, K. Lowell, D. Pullar, D. Duncan (Eds.).
17. Congalton R.G., Green K. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices 2009, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
18. Congalton R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Environment 1991, 37:35-46.
19. Cuevas G., Mas J.F. Land use scenarios: a communication tool with local Communities. Modeling environmental dynamics 2008, Springer-Verlag, Dinamica Project, 2013. http://www.csr.ufmg.br/dinamica/. M. Paegelow, M.T. Camacho Olmedo (Eds.).
20. Darwiche A. Modeling and reasoning with Bayesian networks. Cambridge 2009.
21. Dinamica Project, 2013. http://www.csr.ufmg.br/dinamica/.
22. Eastman J.R., Mc Kendry J., Fulk M.A. Change and time series analysis. Explorations in geographic informations systems technology 2005, United Nations Institude for Training and Research (UNITAR), Geneva.
23. ERDAS Field Guide, V.7.5 1991, Erdas Inc., Atlanta USA. 2nd ed.
24. Fan F., Wang Y., Wang Z. Temporal and spatial change detecting (1998-2003) and predicting of land use and land cover in core corridor of Pearl River Delta (China) by using TM and ETM+ images. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2008, 137:127-147.
25. Ganguly N., Sikdar B., Deutsch A., Canright G., Chaudhuri P. A survey on cellular automata. Project BISON 2001, [IST-38923].
26. Gazulis N., Clarke K.C. Exploring the DNA of our regions: classification of outputs from the SLEUTH model. 7th international conference on cellular automata for research and industry 2006.
27. Godoy M.M.G., Soares-Filho B.S. Modeling intra-urban dynamics in the Savassi neighbourhood, Belo Horizonte city, Brazil. Modeling environmental dynamics 2008, Springer-Verlag. M. Paegelow, M.T. Camacho Olmedo (Eds.).
28. Guan Q., Wang L. An artificial-neural-network-based constrained CA model for simulating urban growth and its application 2005, http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~guan/papers/Guan_AutoCarto2005.pdf.
29. Gunn R.S. Support vector machines for classification and regression. Technical Report 1998.
30. Hailu B.T., Maeda E.E., Pellikka P., Pfeifer M. Identifying potential areas of understorey coffee in Ethiopiás highlands using predictive modeling. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2015, 36:2898-2919.
31. Hu Z., Lo C. Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2007, 31:667-688.
32. Huang B., Zhang L., Wu B. Spatiotemporal analysis of rural-urban land conversion. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2009, 23:379-398.
33. Jantz C.J., Goetz S.J., Smith A.J., Shelly M. Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on land use in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B 2003, 31:251-271.
34. Kitiş C., Şenol S. Determination and monitoring of land use changes by using quickbird satellite data and aerial photographs in a selected area of the Northern Adana in Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 2013, 2:131-139.
35. Lai E.S., Lundie S., Ashbolt N.J. Review of multi-criteria decision aid for integrated sustainability assessment of urban water systems. Urban Water Journal 2008, 5:315-327.
36. Lee D.R., Sallee G.T. A method of measuring shape. The Geographical Review 1970, 60:555-563.
37. Li X., Liu X. An extended cellular automaton using case-based reasoning for simulating urban development in a large complex region. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20:1109-1136.
38. Li X., Yeh A.G. Modeling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2000, 14:131-152.
39. Li X., Yeh A.G. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2002, 16:323-343.
40. Li X., Lin J., Chen Y., Liu X., Ai B. Calibrating cellular automata based on landscape metrics by using genetic algorithms. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2013, 27:594-613.
41. Ligtenberg A., Bregt A., Lammeren R. Multi-actor based land use modeling: spatial planning using agents. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 56:21-33.
42. Lloyd C.D., Berberoglu S., Atkinson P.M., Curran P.J. A comparison of texture measures for the per-field classification of Mediterranean land cover. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2004, 25:3943-3965.
43. Malek Z., Boerboom L., Glade T. Future forest cover change scenarios with implications for landslide risk: an example from buzau subcarpathians, Romania. Environmental Management 2015, 10.1007/s00267-015-0577-y.
44. Mas J.F., Soares Filho B., Pontius R.G., Farfán Gutiérrez M., Rodrigues H. A suite of tools for ROC analysis of spatial models. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2013, 2(3):869-887.
45. Merry F., Soares-Filho B.S., Nepstad D., Aamacher G., Rodrigues H. Balancing, conservation and economic sustainability: the future of the amazon timber industry. Environmental Management EUA 2009, 44(3):395-407.
46. Michaelsen J., Schimel D.S., Fried M.A., Davis F.W., Dubayah R.C. Regression tree analysis of satellite and terrain data to guide vegetation sampling and surveys. Journal of Vegetation Science 1994, 5:673-686.
47. Openshaw S., Abrahart R.J. Preface. GeoComputation 2000, Taylor and Francis, London. S. Openshaw, R.J. Abrahart (Eds.).
48. Park S.Y., Jeon S.W., Kim S.Y., Choi C.U. Prediction and comparison of urban growth by land suitability index mapping using GIS and RS in South Korea. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 99:104-114.
49. Peng C.Y., So T. Modeling strategies in logistic regression. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 2002, 14:147-156.
50. Pontius R.G., Millones M. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Journal of Remote Sensing 2011, 32:4407-4429.
51. Pontius R.G., Schneider L.C. Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2001, 85:239-248.
52. Pontius R.G., Cornell J.D., Hall C.A.S. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with geomod2: application and validation for Costa Rica agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 2001, 1775:1-13.
53. Pontius R.G., Gilmore R., Spencer J. Uncertainty in extrapolations of predictive land change models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32:211-230.
54. Pontius R.G., Boersma W., Castella J.C., Clarke C.K., Nijs T., Dietzel C., et al. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. The Annals of Regional Science 2008, 42:11-47.
55. Rumelhart D.E., Hinton G.E., Williams R.J. Learning representations by back-propagation errors. Nature 1986, 323:533-536.
56. Sönmez M.E. Adana Şehrinin alansal gelişimi ve yakin Çevresinin arazi kullaniminda meydana gelen değişimler. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi 2012, 57:55-69.
57. Shmueli D. Applications of neural networks in transportation planning. Progress in Planning 1998, 50:141-204.
58. Silva E.A., Clarke K.C. Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto Portugal Computers. Environment and Urban Systems 2002, 26:525-552.
59. Silvestrini R.A., Soares-Filho B.S., Nepstad D., Coe M., Rodrigues H.O., Assunção R. Simulating fire regimes in the Amazon in response to climate change and deforestation. Ecological Applications 2011, 21(5):1573-1590.
60. Soares-Filho B.S., Pennachin C.L., Cerqueira G. DINAMICA-a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. Ecological Modeling 2002, 154:217-235.
61. Soares-Filho B.S., Rodrigues H.O., Follador M. A hybrid analytical-heuristic method for calibrating land-use change models. Environmental Modelling & Software 2013, 43(5). 80e87.
62. Soares-Filhoa B., Moutinhob P., Nepstadb D., Andersond A., Rodriguesa H., Garciaa R., et al. Role of Brazilian amozon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America 2010.
63. Steward J.T., Janssen R., Marjan H. A genetic algorithm approach to multi objective landuse planning. Computers and Operations Research 2004, 31:2293-2313.
64. Takada T., Miyamoto A., Hasegawa S.F. Derivation of a yearly transition probability matrix for land-use dynamics and its applications. Landscape Ecology 2010, 25(4):561-572.
65. Tang J., Wang L., Yao Z. Spatio-temporal urban landscape change analysis using the Markov chain model and a modified genetic algorithm. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2007, 28:3255-3271.
66. Teixeira A.M., Soares-Filho B.S., Freitas S., Metzger J.P.W. Modeling landscape dynamics in the Atlantic rainforest domain: implications for conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257:1219-1230.
67. USGS Project Gigalopolis: urban and land cover modeling 2002, USGS. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig/index.html.
68. Verburg P.H., Soepboer W., Veldkamp A., Limpiada R., Espaldon V., Mastura S.S.A. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the clue-s model. Environmental Management 2002, 30:391-405.
69. Weng Q. A remote sensing-GIS evaluation of urban expansion and its impact on surface temperature in the Zhujiang Delta, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2001, 22:1999-2014.
70. White R., Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns. Environment and Planning A 1993, 25:1175-1199.
71. White R.W., Engelen G. Cellular automaton as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modeling. Environmental and Planning B 1997, 24:235-246.
72. Wilson A.G. Urban and regional models in geography and planning 1974, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
73. Wu F., Martin D. Urban expansion simulation of Southeast England using population surface modeling and cellular automata. Environment and Planning A 2002, 34:1855-1876.
74. Wu F., Webster C.J. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B 1998, 25:103-126.
75. Xian G., Crane M. Assessments of urban growth in the Tampa Bay watershed using remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 97:203-215.
76. Xie Y. A generalized model for cellular urban dynamics. Geographical Analysis 1996, 28:350-373.
77. Xu M., Watanachaturaporn P., Varshney P.K., Arora M.K. Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 97:322-336.
78. Yüzer M.A. Growth estimations in settlement planning using a land use cellular automata model LUCAM'. European Planning Studies 2004, 12:551-561.
79. Yang X., Lo C.P. Modeling urban growth and landscape changes in the Atlanta metropolitan area. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2003, 17:463-488.