Tvb runge-kutta local projection discontinuous galerkin finite element method for conservation laws ii: General framework

Mathematics of Computation

Volumn 52, Issue 186, 1989, Pages 411-435

  Cockburn, Bernardo ^a   Shu, Chi Wang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966246413     PISSN: 00255718     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-1989-0983311-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. A. BOURGEAT & B. COCKBURN, The TVD-projection method for solving implicit numerical schemes for scalar conservation laws: A numerical study of a simple case, IMA Preprint Series #311, University of Minnesota, April 1987. To appear in SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Compute March 1989.
2. G. CHAVENT & B. COCKBURN, The local projection P°P1 -discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws, IMA Preprint Series #341, University of Minnesota, September 1987, to appear in M2 AN.
3. G. CHAVENT & G. SALZANO, “A finite element method for the ID water flooding problem with gravity, ” J. Comput. Phys., v. 45, 1982, pp. 307-344.
4. B. COCKBURN, The quasi-monotone schemes for scalar conservation laws, I, II, and III, IMA Preprint Series #263, 268, 277, University of Minnesota, September and October 1986.
5. B. COCKBURN & C.-W. SHU, The Runge-Kutta local projection P1 -discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws, IMA Preprint Series #388, University of Minnesota, 1988.
6. M. CRANDALL & A. Majda, “Monotone difference approximations for scalar conservation laws, ” Math. Comp., v. 34, 1980, pp. 1-21.
7. A. HARTEN, “On a class of high resolution total-variation-stable finite-difference schemes, ” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., v. 21, 1984, pp. 1-23.
8. A. HARTEN, Preliminary results on the extension of ENO schemes to two-dimensional problems, Proc. Internat. Conf. on Hyperbolic Problems, Saint-Étienne, January 1986.
9. A. HARTEN & S. OSHER, “Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes, I, ” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., v. 24, 1987, pp. 279-309.
10. A. HARTEN, B. ENGQUIST, S. OSHER & S. CHAKRAVARTHY, “Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III, ” J. Comput. Phys., v. 71, 1987, pp. 231-303.
11. T. HUGHES & A. BROOK, “Streamline upwind-Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, ” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., v. 32, 1982, pp. 199-259.
12. T. Hughes, L. P. Franca, M. Mallet & A. Misukami, “A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics, I, II, III and IV, ” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., v. 54, 58, 1986, pp. 223-234, 341-355; pp. 305-328, 329-336.
13. C. JOHNSON & J. PITKARANTA, “An analysis of the discontinuous Galerkin method for a scalar hyperbolic equation, ” Math. Comp., v. 46, 1986, pp. 1-26.
14. C. JOHNSON & J. SARANEN, “Streamline diffusion methods for problems in fluid mechanics, ” Math. Comp., v. 47, 1986, pp. 1-18.
15. C. JOHNSON & A. Szepessy, “On the convergence of a finite element method for a nonlinear hyperbolic conservation law, ” Math. Comp., v. 49, 1987, pp. 427-444.
16. C. JOHNSON, A. SZEPESSY & P. Hansbo, “On the convergence of shock capturing streamline diffusion finite element methods for hyperbolic conservation laws, ” preprint.
17. B. VAN LEER, “Towards the ultimate conservation difference scheme, II and V, ” J. Comput. Phys., v. 14 and 32, 1974 and 1979, pp. 361-376 and 101-136.
18. P. LESAINT Sc P.-A. RAVIART, “On a finite element method for solving the neutron transport equation, ” in Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations (C. de Boor, ed.), Academic Press, 1974, pp. 89-145.
19. K. W. MORTON & P. K. SWEBY, “A comparison of flux limited difference methods and characteristic Galerkin methods for shock modelling, ” J. Comput. Phys., v. 73, 1987, pp. 203-230.
20. S. OSHER, “Convergence of generalized MUSCL schemes, ” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., v. 22, 1985, pp. 947-961.
21. S. OSHER & S. CHAKRAVARTHY, “High resolution schemes and the entropy condition, ” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., v. 21, 1984, pp. 955-984.
22. S. OSHER & E. TADMOR, “On the convergence of difference approximations to scalar conservation laws, ” Math. Comp., v. 50, 1988, pp. 19-51.
23. R. SANDERS, “A third-order accurate variation nonexpansive difference scheme for single nonlinear conservation laws, ” Math. Comp., v. 51, 1988, pp. 535-558.
24. C.-W. SHU, “TVB uniformly high-order schemes for conservation laws, ” Math. Comp., v. 49, 1987, pp. 105-121.
25. C.-W. SHU, “TVB boundary treatment for numerical solutions of conservation laws, ” Math. Comp., v. 49, 1987, pp. 123-134.
26. C.-W. SHU, “Total-Variation-Diminishing time discretizations, ” SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Corn- put., v. 9, 1988, pp. 1073-1084.
27. C.-W. SHU & S. OSHER, “Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock- capturing schemes, ” J. Comput. Phys., v. 77, 1988, pp. 439-471.
28. P. SWEBY, “High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws, ” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., v. 21, 1984, pp. 995-1011