An Examination of Some Attempts to Defend the Unity of the Flood Narrative in Genesis

Vetus Testamentum

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1988, Pages 1-21

  Emerton, J A ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84966109335     PISSN: 00424935     EISSN: 15685330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853388X00454     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. See E. Kutsch, VT 11 (1981), pp. 39-47, especially p. 43;
2. J. M. Baumgarten, Tarbiz 32 (1962-3), pp. 317-28, especially pp. 321-2;
3. E. tr. inBaumgarten, Studies in Qumran Law (Leiden, 1977), pp. 101-14, especially pp. 108-9;
4. R. T. Beckwith, Revue de Qumran 10 (1979-81), pp. 365-403, especially pp. 375-9.
5. A recent example by a reputable scholar is R. N. Whybray, The Making of the Pentateuch. A Methodological Study (Sheffield, 1987). It is interesting to note that p. 83 mentions the flood narrative and refers to Wenham for “the inner coherence and artistic patterning of the story”.