II. The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1975, Pages 158-177

  Lijphart, Arend ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965925403     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001041407500800203     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. AITKIN, D. and P. HALL (1969) “Some facts and figures, ” pp. 109–118 in H. Mayer (ed.) Australian Politics: A Second Reader. Melbourne: Cheshire.
2. ALMOND, G. A. (1960) “Introduction: a functional approach to comparative politics, ” pp. 3–64 in G. A. Almond and J. S. Coleman (eds.) The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
3. BANKS, A. S. and R. B. TEXTOR (1963) A Cross-Polity Survey/Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. BLONDEL, J. (1969) An Introduction to Comparative Government. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
5. DAHL, R. A. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
6. DEUTSCH, K. W., S. A. BURRELL, R. A. KANN, M. LEE., Jr., M. LICHTERMAN, R. E. LINDGREN, F. L. LOEWENHEIM and R. W. VAN WAGENEN (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
7. DUVERGER, M. (1963) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley.
8. EGGAN, F. (1954) “Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison.” Amer. Anthropologist 56 (October): 743–763.
9. EISENSTADT, S. N. (1966) “Problems in the comparative analysis of total societies, ” pp. 187–201 in Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, Vol. I. Evian: International Sociological Association.
10. EULAU, H. (1962) “Comparative political analysis: a methodological note.” Midwest J. of Pol. Sci. 6 (November): 397–407.
11. EVANS-PRITCHARD, E. E. (1963) The Comparative Method in Social Anthropology. London: Athlone Press.
12. GUSTAVSSON, S. and E. VEDUNG (1975) “The comparative method and its neighbours, ” in B. Barry (ed.) Power and Political Theory: Some European Perspectives (forthcoming).
13. HECKSCHER, G. (1957) The Study of Comparative Government and Politics. London: Allen & Unwin.
14. HOETJES, B.J.S. (1973) “Commentaar.” Acta Politica 8 (January): 20–26.
15. HOLT, R. T. and J. E. TURNER (1970) “The methodology of comparative research, ” pp. 1–20 in R. T. Holt and J. E. Turner (eds.) The Methodology of Comparative Research. New York: Free Press.
16. JANDA, K. (1975) Comparative Political Parties: A Cross-National Handbook. New York: Free Press (forthcoming).
17. JOHNSON, C. (1974) “Political science and East Asian area studies.” World Politics 26 (July): 560–575.
18. KALLEBERG, A. L. (1966) “The logic of comparison: a methodological note on the comparative study of political systems.” World Politics 19 (October): 69–82.
19. KUHN, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
20. LAFFERTY, W. M. (1972) “Contexts, levels, and the language of comparison: alternative research.” Social Sci. Information 11 (April): 63–91.
21. LAKEMAN, E. (1970) How Democracies Vote: A Study of Majority and Proportional Electoral Systems. London: Faber & Faber.
22. LAPALOMBARA, J. (1970) “Parsimony and empiricism in comparative politics: an anti-scholastic view, ” pp. 123–149 in R. T. Holt and J. E. Turner (eds.) The Methodology of Comparative Research. New York: Free Press.
23. LASSWELL, H. D. (1968) “The future of the comparative method.” Comp. Politics 1 (October): 3–18.
24. LIJPHART, A. (1972) “Toward empirical democratic theory: research strategies and tactics.” Comp. Politics 4 (April): 417–432.
25. LIJPHART, A. (1971) “Comparative politics and the comparative method.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 65 (September): 682–693.
26. LIJPHART, A. [ed.] (1969) Politics in Europe: Comparisons and Interpretations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
27. LINZ, J. J. and A. DE MIGUEL (1966) “Within-nation differences and comparisons: the eight Spains, ” pp. 267–319 in R. L. Merritt and S. Rokkan (eds.) Comparing Nations: The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
28. LIPSET, S. M. (1963) “The value patterns of democracy: a case study in comparative analysis.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 28 (August): 515–531.
29. MACKIE, T. T. and R. ROSE (1974) The International Almanac of Electoral History. London: Macmillan.
30. MAYER, L. C. (1972) Comparative Political Inquiry: A Methodological Survey. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.
31. MILL, J. S. (1970) A System of Logic. London: Longman.
32. MODELSKI, G. (1970) “The promise of geocentric politics.” World Politics 22 (July): 617–635.
33. MOLNAR, G. (1967) “Deviant case analysis in social science.” Politics 2 (May): 1–11.
34. MOUL, W. B. (1974) “On getting something for nothing: a note on causal models of political development” Comp. Pol. Studies 7 (July): 139–164.
35. MURDOCK, G. P. (1949) Social Structure. New York: Macmillan.
36. NAROLL, R. (1965) “Gallonapos;s problem: the logic of cross-cultural research.” Social Research 32 (Winter): 428–451.
37. NEEDHAM, R. (1962) “Notes on comparative method and prescriptive alliance.” Bijdragen tot de taal-, Land-en Volkendunde 11: 160–182.
38. NILSON, S. S. (1974) “The consequences of electoral laws.” European J. of Pol. Research 2 (September): 283–290.
39. NOLDUS, T. (1973) “Vergelijkende politicologie: Kanttekeningen bij het artikel van U. Rosenthal.” Acta Politica 8 (July): 347–352.
40. PRZEWORSKI, A. and H. TEUNE (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
41. RAE, D. W. (1971) The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
42. ROBERTS, G. K. (1972) What is Comparative Politics? London: Macmillan.
43. ROKKAN, S. (1970) Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
44. ROKKAN, S. and J. MEYRIAT (1969) International Guide to Electoral Statistics, Vol. I: National Elections in Western Europe. The Hague: Mouton.
45. ROSENAU, J. N. (1968) “Private preferences and political responsibilities: the relative potency of individual and role variables in the behavior of U.S. senators, ” pp. 17–50 in J. D. Singer (ed.) Quantitative International Politics: Insights and Evidence. New York: Free Press.
46. ROSENTHAL, U. (1973) “Vergelijkende politicologie.” Acta Politica 8 (January): 3–19.
47. SARTORI, G. (1970a) “Concept misformation in comparative politics.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 64 (December): 1033–1053.
48. SARTORI, G. (1970b) “The typology of party systems: proposals for improvement, ” pp. 322–352 in E. Allardt and S. Rokkan (eds.) Mass Politics: Studies in Political Sociology. New York: Free Press.
49. SCARROW, H. A. (1969) Comparative Political Analysis: An Introduction. New York: Harper & Row.
50. SCOTT, R. (1966) “Parties and parliament: The Tasmanian House of Assembly, 1909–1959.” Politics 1 (May): 32–42.
51. SJOBERG, G. (1955) “The comparative method in the social sciences.” Philosophy of Sci. 22 (April): 106–117.
52. SMELSER, N. J. (1973) “The methodology of comparative analysis, ” pp. 42–86 in D. P. Warwick and S. Osherson (eds.) Comparative Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
53. SMELSER, N. J. (1967) “Notes on the methodology of comparative analysis of economic activity, ” pp. 101–117 in Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, Vol. II. Evian: International Sociological Association.
54. STASSEN, G. H. (1972) “Individual preference versus role-constraint in policymaking: senatorial response to Secretaries Acheson and Dulles.” World Politics 25 (October): 96–119.
55. STRETTON, H. (1969) The Political Sciences: General Principles of Selection in Social Science and History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
56. TAYLOR, C. L. and M. C. HUDSON (1972) World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
57. VON BEYME, K. (1972) Die politischen Theorien der Gegenwart: Eine Einfuhrung. Munich: Piper.
58. WALKER, S. G. (1973) “Case studies and cumulation: the study of divided nations.” J. of International Affairs 27: 261–267.
59. WARWICK, D. P. and & OSHERSON (1973) “Comparative analysis in the social sciences, ” pp. 3–41 in D. P. Warwick and S. Osherson (eds.) Comparative Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
60. WILDAVSKY, A. B. (1959) “A methodological critique of Duvergerapos;s Political Parties.” J. of Politics 21 (May): 303–318.
61. ZELDITCH, M., Jr. (1971) “Intelligible comparisons, ” pp. 267–307 in I. Valuer (ed.) Comparative Methods in Sociology: Essays on Trends and Applications. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.