Modeled Variance in Two-Level Models

Sociological Methods & Research

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 342-363

  Snijders, Tom A B ^a   Bosker, Roel J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965636487     PISSN: 00491241     EISSN: 15528294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0049124194022003004     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Aitkin, M. and N.T. Longford. 1986. “Statistical Modelling Issues in School Effectiveness Studies (With Discussion).” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 149A: 1-43.
2. Bryk, A.S. and S.W. Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Bryk, A. S., S.W. Raudenbush, M. Seltzer, and R.T. Congdon. 1988. HLM. Chicago: University of Chicago.
4. Dempster, A. P., D.B. Rubin, and R.K. Tsutakawa. 1981. “Estimation in Covariance Components Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 76: 341-353.
5. Goldstein, H. 1987. Multilevel Models in educational and Social Research. London: Griffin.
6. Herbach, L.H. 1959. “Properties of Model II-Type Analysis of Variance Tests: A. Optimum Nature of the F-Test for Model II in the Balanced Case.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30: 939-959.
7. Prosser, R., J. Rasbash, and H. Goldstein. 1991. ML3: Software for Three-Level Analysis. Users' Guide. London: University of London, Institute of education.
8. Raudenbush, S. W., and A.S. Bryk. 1986. “A Hierarchical Model for Studying School Effects.” Sociology of education 59: 1-17.
9. Searle, S.R. 1971. Linear Models. New York: Wiley.
10. Vermeulen, C.J.A.J. and R.J. Bosker. 1992. De Omvang en Gevolgen van Deeltijdarbeid en Volledige Inzetbaarheid in het Basisonderwijs. Enschede: University of Twente.