Toward a Better Understanding of Reader Analysis

Journal of Business Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 29-45

  Suchan, James ^a   Dulek, Ron ^b  

^a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965573281     PISSN: 00219436     EISSN: 15524582     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002194368802500204     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bielawski, L. and Parks, F.A. (1987). Organizational writing. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Bovee, C. & Thill, J. (1986). Business communication today. New York: Random House.
3. Brent, D. (1985). Indirect structure and reader response. The Journal of Business Communication, 22, 5-8.
4. Bruffee, K.A. (1986). Social construction, language and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographic essay. College English, 48, 773-790.
5. Clark, D.B. (1982). The meaning of audience. College English, 44, 247-257.
6. Deal, T. & Kennedy, A. (1982). Corporate culture: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Ede, L. ( 1984). Audience: An introduction to research. College Composition and Communication, 35, 140-154.
8. Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1984). Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 35, 155-171.
9. Freed, R. & Broadhead, G. (1987). Discourse communities, sacred texts, and institutional norms. College Composition and Communication, 38, 154-165.
10. French, J.R.P. & Raven, B. (1959). The basis of social power. In D. Cart-wright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
11. Gieselman, R. (1982). Reading, writing and research: Pedagogical implications. The Journal of Business Communication, 19, 23-39.
12. Golen, S., Pearce, G., & Figgins, R. (1985). Report writing for business and industry. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Hanna, M. & Wilson, G. (1984). Communicating in business and professional settings. New York: Random House.
14. Kroll, B. (1984). Writing for readers: Three perspectives on audience. College Composition and Communication, 35, 172-185.
15. Locker, K. (1982). Theoretical justifications for using reader benefits. The Journal of Business Communication, 19, 51-66.
16. Lord, W., Jr. & Dawe, J. (1986). Functional business communication (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
17. McCallister, L. (1983). Predicted employee compliance to downward communication styles. The Journal of Business Communication, 20, 67-79.
18. Micheli, L., Cespedes, F., Byker, D., & Raymond, T.J. (1984). Managerial communication. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
19. Ong, W.J. (1975). The writer's audience is always a fiction. PMLA, 90, 9-21.
20. Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z.: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Peters, T. & Allen, N. (1985). Passion for excellence. New York: Random House.
22. Peters, T. & Waterman, R. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Warner Books.
23. Saldow, G. (1982). A study of the linguistic dimension of information processing as a function of cognitive complexity. The Journal of Business Communication, 19, 55-70.
24. Saunders, A.G. (1925). Effective business English. New York: The Macmillan Company.
25. Schein, E.H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
26. Smeltzer, L. (1986). An analysis of receiver's reactions to electronically mediated communication. The Journal of Business Communication, 23, 37-54.
27. Suchan, J. & Dulek, R. (1986). An empirical assessment of style: Trained and untrained students’ responses. The Journal of Business Communication, 23, 57-67.
28. Szilagyi, A., Jr. & Wallace, M.J., Jr. (1980). Organizational behavior and performance. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
29. Thomas, G. (1986). Mutual knowledge: A theoretical basis for analyzing audience. College English, 48, 580-594.
30. Walzer, A.E. (1985). Articles from the California divorce project: A case study of the concept of audience. College Composition and Communication, 36, 150-159.
31. Wells, W. (1981). Communications in business (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Kent.