Wife Abuse through the Lens of “Systems Theory”

The Counseling Psychologist

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 598-602

  Sprenkle, Douglas H ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965572028     PISSN: 00110000     EISSN: 15523861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011000094224005     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Auerswald, E.H. (1987). Epistemological confusion in family therapy and research. Family Process, 26, 317-330.
2. Breunlin, D. C., Schwartz, R. C., & Mac Kune-Karrer, B. (1992). Metaframeworks: Transcending the models of family therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Carden, A.D. (1994). Wife abuse and the wife abuser: Review and recommendations. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 539-582.
4. de Shazer, S. (1991). Here we go again: Maps, territories, interpretations, and the distinction between “the” and “a” or “an.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 193-195.
5. Dutton, D.G. (1985). An ecologically nested theory of male violence toward intimates. International Journal of Women's Studies, 8(4), 404-413.
6. Engel, G.L. (1977). The need for a new medical model. Science, 196, 129-139.
7. Goldberg, J.R. (1993). Jacobson's research targets domestic violence. Family Therapy News, 24, 3-6.
8. Imber-Black, E. (1988). Families and larger systems: A therapist's guide through the labyrinth. New York: Guilford.
9. Jacobson, N.S. (1994). Rewards and dangers in researching domestic violence. Family Process, 33, 81-86.
10. Lipchik, E. (1991). Spouse abuse: Challenging the party line. The Family Therapy Networker, 15, 59-63.
11. Nichols, M.P. (1987). The self in the system. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
12. Olney, K. (1994). Can violent men be treated? The Family Therapy Networker, 18, 12-13.
13. Piercy, F. P., & Sprenkle, D.H. (1990). Marriage and family therapy: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1116-1126.