Men's and women's preferences in marital partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1995, Pages 728-750

  Hatfield, Elaine ^a   Sprecher, Susan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965567109     PISSN: 00220221     EISSN: 15525422     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002202219502600613     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Berscheid, E. (1993). Foreword. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology ofgender (pp. vii-xvii). New York: Guilford.
3. Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories of women. New York: Pergamon.
4. Braudel, F. (1984). The perspective of the world (S. Reynolds, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
5. Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. Amenrcan Scientist, 73, 47-51.
6. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
7. Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
8. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 50, 559-570.
9. Buss, D. M., et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5-47.
10. Chu, G. C. (1985). The changing concept of self in contemporary China. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F.L.K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives (pp. 252-277). London: Tavistock.
11. Collier, J. F., & Rosaldo, M. Z. (1981). Politics and gender in simple societies. In S. B. Ortner & H. Whitehead (Eds.), Sexual meanings: The cultural construction of gender and sexuality (pp. 275-329). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925-935.
13. Doi, L. T. (1973). The anatomyofdependence (J. Bester, Trans.). Tokyo: KodanshaInternational.
14. Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981-993.
15. Gangestad, S. W. (1993). Sexual selection and physical attractiveness: Implications of mating dynamics. Human Nature, 4, 205-236.
16. Goodwin, R., & Tang, D. (1990). Preferences for friends and close relationship partners: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 579-581.
17. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993a). Historical and cross-cultural perspectives on passionate love. Annual Review of Sex Research, 4, 67-98.
18. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993b). Love, sex, and intimacy: Theirpsychology, biology, and history. New York: HarperCollins.
19. Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.
20. Ho, D.Y.F., (1982). Asian concepts in behavioral science. Psychologia, 25, 228-235.
21. Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In J. B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec, & R. C. Annis (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 335-355). Lisse, Holland: Swets & Zeitlinger.
22. Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1987). Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 194-200.
23. Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Hsu, F.L.K. (1985). The self in cross-cultural perspective. In A. J. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F.L.K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self. Asian and Western perspectives (pp. 24-55). London: Tavistock.
25. Kagitçibaşi, C. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (pp. 135-200). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
26. Kenrick, D. T., & Trost, M. R. (1989). Areproductive exchange model of heterosexual relations: Putting proximate economics in ultimate perspective. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 92-118). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
28. McNeill, W. (1963). The rise of the West. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Quinn, N. (1977). Anthropological studies on women's status. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6, 181-225.
30. Rapson, R. L. (1988). American yearnings: Love, money, and endless possibility. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
31. Reiss, I. L., & Lee, G. R. (1988). Family systems in America (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
32. Schwartz, S. H. (1993, June). Toward explanations of national differences in value priorities. Invited address delivered at the 24th Congress of the Interamerican Society of Psychology, Santiago, Chile.
33. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Tmandis, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theoretical and methodological issues (Vol. 18, pp. 85-122). London: Sage.
34. Shlapentokh, V. (1984). Love, marriage, andfriendship in the Soviet Union: Idealsandpractices. New York: Praeger.
35. South, S. J. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 928-940.
36. Sprecher, S., & Chandak, R. (1992). Attitudes about arranged marriages and dating among men and women from India. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 20, 59-69.
37. Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074-1080.
38. Stavrianos, L. S. (1981). Global rift: The Third World comes of age. New York: Morrow.
39. Stem, M. (1979). Sex in the USSR (M. Howson & C. Ryan, Trans.). New York: Times Books.
40. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: New Directions.
41. Tavris, C., & Offir, C. (1984). The longest war: Sex differences in perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
42. Travis, C. B., & Yeager, C. P. (1991). Sexual selection, parental investment, and sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 117-129.
43. Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
44. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). Chicago: Aldine.
45. Wallen, K. (1989). Mate selection: Economics and affection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 37-38.
46. Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanations? Etiology and Sociobiology, 13, 115-124.
47. Yang, K. S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (p. xx-xx). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.