Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access

Language and Speech

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1986, Pages 201-220

  Cutler, Anne ^a  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

lexical access; prosody; speech recognition; stress

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965559019     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002383098602900302     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bansal, R.K., (1966). The intelligibility of Indian English. Ph.D. thesis, London University.
2. Bolinger, D.L., (1981). Two Kinds of Vowels, Two Kinds of Rhythm. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
3. Bond, Z.S., (1971). Units in speech perception. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 1–112.
4. Bond, Z.S. and Small, L.H., (1983). Voicing, vowel and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 470–474.
5. Browman, C.P., (1978). Tip of the tongue and slip of the ear: Implications for language processing. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 42.
6. Brown, R. and McNeill, D., (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337.
7. Carlson, R., Elenius, K., Granstrom B. and Hunnicutt, S., (1985). Phonetic and orthographic properties of the basic vocabulary of five European languages. Speech Transmission Laboratory: Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 1 1985, 63–94.
8. Cole, R., Jakimik J. and Cooper, W.E., (1978). Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 44–56.
9. Cutler, A., (1980). Errors of stress and intonation. In V.A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in Linguistic Performance: Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen and Hand (pp. 67–80). New York: Academic Press.
10. Cutler, A. and Clifton, C.E., (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In H. Bouma and D.G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 183–196). Hills-dale, N J.: Erlbaum.
11. Cutler, A. and Foss, D.J., (1977). On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing. Language and Speech. 20, 1–10.
12. Cutlf, R. A. and Norris, D.G., (in press). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
13. Engdahl, E., (1978). Word stress as an organizing principle for the lexicon. Papers from the Para-session on the Lexicon at the Fourteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 138–147).
14. Forster, K.I. and Chambers, S.M., (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635.
15. Foss, D.J. and Gernsbacher, M.A., (1983). Cracking the dual code: Toward a unitary model of phoneme identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 609–632.
16. Gernsbacher, M.A., (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281.
17. Klatt, D.H., (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 279–312.
18. Kučera, H. and Francis, W.N., (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press.
19. Ladd, D.R. and Cutler, A., (1983). Models and measurements in the study of prosody. In A. Cutler and D.R. Ladd (Eds.),. Prosody: Models and Measurements (pp. 1–10). Heidelberg: Springer.
20. Lagerquist, L.M., (1980). Linguistic evidence from paronomasia. Papers from the Sixteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 185–191).
21. Lieberman, P., (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech. 6, 172–187.
22. Lieberman, P., (1965). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word, 21, 40–54.
23. Marslen-Wilson, W., (1980). Speech understanding as a psychological process. In J.C. Simon (Ed.), Spoken Language Generation and Understanding (pp. 39–67). Dordrecht: Reidel.
24. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J.-Y., Frauenfelder U. and Segui, J., (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298–305.
25. Nakatani, L.H. and Shaffer, J.A., (1978). Hearing “words” without words: Prosodic cues for word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 234–245.
26. Norris, D.G. and Cutler, A., (1985). Juncture detection. Linguistics, 23, 689–705.
27. Prather, P. and Swinney, D.A., (1977). Some effects of syntactic context upon lexical access. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, San Francisco.
28. Robinson, G.M., (1977). Rhythmic organization in speech processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hitman Perception and Performance, 3, 83–91.
29. Shields, J.L., McHugh A. and Martin, J.G., (1974). Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 250–255.
30. Shillcock, R.C., (1982). The on-line resolution of pronominal anaphora. Language and Speech, 25, 385–401.
31. Swinney, D.A., (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.
32. Swinney, D., Onifer, W., Prather P. and Hirshkowitz, M., (1979). Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences. Memory and Cognition, 7, 159–165.
33. Taft, L., (1984). Prosodic constraints and lexical parsing strategies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts.
34. Tanenhaus, M.K., Leiman, J.M. and Seidenberg, M.S., (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in sentence contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 427–440.
35. Williams, J.N., (1986). The effective context for priming word recognition. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.