Interpersonal deception: VIII. Further Analysis of Nonverbal and Verbal Correlates of Equivocation from the Bavelas et al. (1990) Research

Journal of Language and Social Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 396-417

  Buller, David B ^a   Burgoon, Judee K ^a   Buslig, Aileen L S ^a   Roiger, James F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965484727     PISSN: 0261927X     EISSN: 15526526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X94134003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Buller, D. B., & Aune, R. K. (1987). Nonverbal cues to deception among intimates, friends, and strangers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 269-290.
3. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Communicating strategically: Strategies in interpersonal communication (pp. 191-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., Buslig, A.L.S., & Roiger, J. F. (1994). Interpersonal deception: X The language of interpersonal deception. Communication Theory.
5. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., White, C., & Ebesu, A. S. (1994, July). Behavioral profiles of falsification, concealment, and equivocation: A view from interpersonal deception theory. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Brisbane, Australia.
6. Buller, D. B., Comstock, J., Aune, R. K., & Strzyzewski, K D. (1989). The effect of probing on deceivers and truthtellers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 155-170.
7. Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1-24.
8. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Dillman, L., & Walther, J. (in press). Interpersonal deception: IVEffects of suspicion on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Human Communication Research.
9. Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Guerrero, L., Afifi, W, & Feldman, C. (1994, July). Information management dimensions underlying different types of deceptive messages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sydney, Australia.
10. Erickson, F. (1979). Talking down: Some cultural sources of miscommunication in interracial interviews. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Applications and cultural implications (pp. 99-126). New York: Academic Press.
11. Hopper, R., & Bell, R. A. (1984). Broadening the deception construct. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 288-302.
12. McCornack, S. A. (1992). When the alteration of information is viewed as deception: An empirical test of information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 17-29.
13. Metts, S. (1989). An exploratory investigation of deception in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 159-179.
14. Metts, S., & Chronis, H. (1986, May). An exploratory investigation of relational deception. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
15. Metts, S., & Hippensteele, S. (1988, February). Characteristics of deception in close relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
16. Watzlawick, P, Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
17. Triangle Research Collaboratiave. (1991). Observational Coding System. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
18. Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.