A democratic legislature in the making: The Historic Hungarian Elections of 1990

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1992, Pages 430-454

  Hibbing, John R ^a   Patterson, Samuel C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965431731     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: 15523829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414092024004002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ágh, A. (1990). Hungarian experiences of the democratic transition to a multiparty system. Paper presented at a conference of Hungarian and American political scientists, Budapest, March 22-23.
2. Butler, D. (1981). Electoral systems. In D. Butler, H. R. Penniman, & A. Ranney (Eds.), Democracy at the polls: A comparative study of competitive national elections (pp. 7-25). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
3. Grofman, B., & Lijphart, A. (Eds.). (1986). Electoral laws and their political consequences. New York: Agathon.
4. Gudgin, G., & Taylor, P.J. (1979). Seats, votes, and the spatial organization of elections. London: Pion.
5. Hardi, P. (1990). Constitutionalism and political change in Hungary. Policy Papers Series No. 1, Hungarian Institute of International Affairs, Budapest.
6. Henderson, R. E., & Papp, G. (Eds.). (1990). Colloquium on Hungarian electoral law. Washington, DC: National Republican Institute for International Affairs.
7. Johnston, R. J. (1979). Political, electoral, and spatial systems. Oxford: Clarendon.
8. Kaase, M. (1984). Personalized proportional representation: The “model” of the West German electoral system. In A. Lijphart & B. Grofman (Eds.), Choosing an electoral system (pp. 155-164). New York: Praeger.
9. Katz, R. S. (1980). A theory of parties and electoral systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. King, G., & Browning, R. X. (1987). Democratic representation and partisan bias in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 81, 1251-1273.
11. Lanchester, F. (1981). Sistemi elettorali e forma di governo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
12. Lijphart, A. (1990). The political consequences of electoral laws, 1945-85. American Political Science Review, 84, 481-496.
13. Lijphart, A., & Grofman, B. (Eds.). (1984). Choosing an electoral system. New York: Praeger.
14. Loewenberg, G., & Patterson, S. C. (1979). Comparing legislatures. Boston: Little, Brown.
15. Nikolaev, R. (1990, June). Preparations for free elections of a Grand National Assembly. Report on Eastern Europe, pp. 7-8.
16. Oppenheimer, B. I. (1989). Split party control of Congress, 1981-86: Exploring electoral and apportionment explanations. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 653-669.
17. Rae, D. W. (1971). The political consequences of electoral laws (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Szoboszlai, G. (1990a). From paternalistic to pluralistic electoral system: The case of Hungary, 1985-1990. Paper presented at a conference of Hungarian and American political scientists, Budapest, March 22-23.
19. Szoboszlai, G. (1990b). Political transition and constitutional changes: The case of Hungary. Paper presented to the U.S.-Hungarian Political Science Roundtable at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 28-29.
20. Taagepera, R. 1986. Reformulating the Cube Law for proportional representation elections. American Political Science Review, 80, 489-504.
21. Taagepera, R., & Shugart, M. S. (1989). Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.