Are Social Work Journal Editorial Boards Competent? Some Disquieting Data With Implications for Research on Social Work Practice

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1992, Pages 487-496

  Pardeck, John T ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965401372     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: 15527581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973159200200405     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baker, D. (1990). Citation analysis: A methodological review. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 26, 3-10.
2. Brewer, C., & Lait, J. (1980). Can social work survive? London: Temple Smith.
3. Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Clark, C. (1973). Introduction: Some reflexive comments on the role of editor. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 1-9.
5. Epstein, W. (1990a). Confirmational response bias among social work journals. Sccence, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 9-38.
6. Epstein, W. (1990b). The obligation of intellectuals. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 244-247.
7. Garfield, E. (Ed.). (1988). Social Sciences Citation Index: Journal citation report. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
8. Lindsey, D. (1976). Distinction, achievement, and editorial board membership. American Psychologist, 31, 799-804.
9. Lindsey, D. (1977). The processing of self-criticism by social work editorial boards. American Psychologist, 32, 1110-1115.
10. Lindsey, D. (1978). The scientific publication system in social science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. MacRoberts, M., & Mac Roberts, B. (1988a). Author motivation for not citing influences: A methodological note. Journal of theAmerican Society for Information Science, 39, 432-433.
12. MacRoberts, M., & MacRoberts, B. (1988b). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Informational Science, 40, 342-349.
13. Mahoney, M. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175.
14. National Association of Social Workers. (1980). Code of ethics. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
15. Pardeck, J., Arndt, B., Light, D., Mosley, G., Thomas, S., Werner, M., & Wilson, K. (1991a). Distinction and achievement levels of editorial board members of psychology and social work journals. Psychological Reports, 68, 523-527.
16. Pardeck, J., Arndt, B., Light, D., Mosley, G., Thomas, S., Werner, M., & Wilson, K. (1991b). An exploration of editorial boards of psychology and social work journals: Implications for child welfare practice. Early Child Development and Care, 71, 89-96.
17. Peters, D., & Ceci, S. (1982). Peer review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-195.
18. Peterson, D. (1976). Is psychology a profession? American Psychologist, 31, 572-581.
19. Rosen, A. (1969). Doctoral education, professional culture, and development of social work knowledge. Applied Social Studies, 1, 151-159.
20. Social Sciences Citation Index. (1989). Philadelphia: Institute for Social Research.
21. Taber, M., & Shapiro, I. (1965). Social work and its knowledge base: A content analysis of the periodical literature. Social Work, 10, 100-106.
22. Weinberger, R., & Tripodi, T. (1969). Trends in types of research reported in selected social work journals, 1956-65. Social Service Review, 43, 439-477.
23. Zuckerman, H., & Merton, R. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalism, structure, and functions of the referee system. Minerva, 9, 66-100.