The counternull value of an effect size: A New Statistic

Psychological Science

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 1994, Pages 329-334

  Rosenthal, Robert ^a   Rubin, Donald B ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965400680     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00281.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berkowitz L (1992) Some thoughts about conservative evaluations of replications Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 319–324.
2. Cohen J (1965) Some statistical issues in psychological research In Wolman B. B. (Ed) Handbook of clinical psychology (pp 95–121) New York Mc Graw-Hill.
3. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
4. Cohen J (1990) Things I have learned (so far) American Psychologist 45 1304–1312.
5. Cooper H. M. (1989) Integrating research A guide for literature reviews Newbury Park, CA Sage.
6. Gigerenzer G (1991) From tools to theories A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology Psychological Review 98 254–267.
7. Gigerenzer G (1993) The superego the ego and the id in statistical reasoning In Keren G Lewis C (Eds)A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences Vol 1 Methodological issues (pp 311–339) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
8. Glass G. V. McGaw B Smith M. L. (1981) Meta-analysis in social research Beverly Hills, CA Sage.
9. Hedges LV (1981) Distribution theory for Glass s estimator of effect size and related estimators Journal of Educational Statistics 6 107–128.
10. Hedges L. V. (1982) Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments Psychological Bulletin 92 490–499.
11. Hedges L. V. OIkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis New York Academic press.
12. Pearson K (1904, November 5) Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics British Medical Journal pp 1243–1246.
13. Pollard P (1993) How significant is significance?In Keren G Lewis C (Eds)A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences Vol 1 Methodological issues (pp 449–460) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
14. Rosenthal R (1968) Experimenter expectancy and the reassuring nature of the null hypothesis decision procedure Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement 70 30–47.
15. Rosenthal R (1991) Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA Sage.
16. Rosenthal R (1994) Parametric measures of effect size In Cooper H. M. Hedges L. V. (Eds)Handbook of research synthesis (pp 231–244) New York Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Rosenthal R Rosnow R. L. (1991) Essentials behavioral research Methods and data analysis (2nd ed) New York McGraw Hill.
18. Rosenthal R Rubin D. B. (1982) Comparing effect sizes of independent studies Psychological Bulletin 92 500–504.
19. Rosenthal K Rubin D. B. (1985) Statistical analysis Summarizing evidence versus establishing facts Psychological Bulletin 97 527–529.
20. Rosenthal R Rubin D. B. (1989) Effect size estimation for one sample multiple-choice-type data Design analysis and meta-analysis Psychological Bulletin 106 332–337.
21. Rosenthal R Rubin D. B. (1991) Further issues in effect estimation for one sample multiple-choice-type data Psychological Bulletin 109 351–352.
22. Rosenthal R Rubin D. B. (1992–1993) An effect size estimator for parapsychological research European Journal of Parapsychology 9 1–11.
23. Snedecor G. W. (1956) Statistical methods (5th ed) Ames, Iowa State University Press.
24. Snedecor G. W. Cochran W. G. (1967) Statistical methods (6th ed) Ames, Iowa State University Press.
25. Snedecor G. W. Cochran W. G. (1989) Statistical methods (8th ed) Ames, Iowa State University Press.
26. Tatsuoka M (1993) Effect size In Keren G Lewis C (Eds)A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences Vol 1 Methodological issues (pp 461–479) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
27. Tversky A Kahneman D (1971) Belief in the law of small numbers Psychological Bulletin 76 105–110.
28. Zuckerman M Hodgins H. S. Zuckerman A Rosenthal R (1993) Contemporary issues in the analysis of data A survey of 551 psychologists Psychological Science 4 49–53.