Application of large-scale, multi-resolution watershed modeling framework using the Hydrologic and Water Quality System (HAWQS)

Water (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Yen, Haw ^a   Daggupati, Prasad ^b   White, Michael J ^c   Srinivasan, Raghavan ^b   Gossel, Arndt ^d   Wells, David ^d   Arnold, Jeffrey G ^c  

^a BLACKLAND RESEARCH AND EXTENSION CENTER   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^d U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support system; Model calibration; SWAT; Watershed modeling; Web based application

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; POLLUTION CONTROL; RIVER POLLUTION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS; WEBSITES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS); MODEL CALIBRATION; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SWAT; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENTS; WATERSHED MODELING; WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS;

WATER RESOURCES;

CALIBRATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; POLLUTION CONTROL; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SOFTWARE; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCE; WATERSHED;

ILLINOIS BASIN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84965179547     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/w8040164     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Jha, M.K.; Gassman, P.W. Changes in hydrology and streamflow as predicted by a modelling experiment forced with climate models. Hydrol. Process. 2014, 28, 2772-2781.
2. White, M.J.; Gambone, M.; Yen, H.; Arnold, J.G.; Harmel, R.D.; Santhi, C.; Haney, R. Regional Blue and Green Water Balances and Use by Selected Crops in the U.S. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2015, 51.
3. Bai, Y.; Wagener, T.; Reed, P. A top-down framework for watershed model evaluation and selection under uncertainty. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24, 901-916.
4. Chou, F.N.-F.; Wu, C.-W. Determination of cost coefficients of a priority-based water allocation linear programming model-A network flow approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18, 1857-1872.
5. Winsemius, H.C.; Schaefli, B.; Montanari, A.; Savenije, H.H.G. On the calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins: A framework for integrating hard and soft hydrological information. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45, 1-15.
6. Williams, J.W.; Izaurralde, R.C.; Steglich, E.M. Agricultural Policy/Environmental EXtender Model Theoretical Documentation Version 0806; Texas A&M University: College Station, TX, 2012; p. 131.
7. Bicknell, B.R.; Imhoff, J.C.; Kittle, J.L., Jr.; Donigian, A.S.; Johanson, R.C. Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran: User's manual for version 11; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory: Athens, GA, USA, 1997; p. 755.
8. Arnold, J.G.; Moriasi, D.; Gassman, P.; Abbaspour, K.C.; White, M.J.; Srinivasan, R.; Santhi, C.; Harmel, R.D.; van Griensven, A.; Van Liew, M.W.; Kannan, N.; et al. SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Trans. ASABE 2012, 55, 1491-1508.
9. Arnold, J.G.; Youssef, M.; Yen, H.; White, M.; Sheshukov, A.; Sadeghi, A.; Moriasi, D.; Steiner, J.; Amatya, D.; Haney, E.; et al. Hydrological Processes and Model Representation. Trans. ASABE 2015, 58, 1637-1660.
10. Iowa State University, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, SWAT Literature Database for Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles. Available online: https://www.card.iastate.edu/swat_articles/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
11. Neitsch, S.L.; Arnold, J.G.; Kiniry, J.R.; Williams, J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009; TexasWater Resources Institute: College Station, TX, USA, 2011.
12. Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Liew, M.W.V.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50, 885-900.
13. Moriasi, D.N.; Gitau, G.W.; Pai, N.; Daggupati, P. Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and criteria. Trans. ASABE 2015, 58, 1763-1785.
14. Yen, H.; Wang, X.; Fontane, D.G.; Arabi, M.; Harmel, R.D. A framework for propagation of uncertainty contributed by input data, parameterization, model structure, and calibration/validation data in watershed modeling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 54.
15. Abbaspour, K.C.; Yang, J.; Maximov, I.; Siber, R.; Bogner, K.; Mieleitner, J.; Zobrist, J.; Srinivasa, R. Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J. Hydrol. 2007, 333, 413-430.
16. Yen, H.; Jeong, J.; Tseng, W-H.; Kim, M-K.; Records, R.M.; Arabi, M. Computational procedure for evaluating sampling techniques on watershed model calibration. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2015, 20.
17. De, S.; Bezuglov, A. Data model for a decision support in comprehensive nutrient management in the United States. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2006, 21, 852-867.
18. Miller, S.N.; Semmens, D.J.; Goodrich, D.C.; Hernandez, M.; Miller, R.C.; Kepner, W.G.; Guertin, D.P. The automated geospatial watershed assessment tool. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22, 365-377.
19. TexasA&MUniversity. Hydrologic andWater Quality System. Availalble online: https://epahawqs.tamu.edu/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
20. Arnold, J.G.; Allen, P.M.; Bernhardt, G. A comprehensive surfacegroundwater flow model. J. Hydrol. 1993, 142, 47-69.
21. Gassman, P.W.; Reyes, M.R.; Green, C.H.; Arnold, J.G. The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications and future research directions. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2007, 50, 1211-1250.
22. Daggupati, P.; Yen, H.; White, M.J.; Srinivasan, R.; Arnold, J.G.; Keitzer, C.S.; Sowa, S.P. Impact of model development, calibration and validation decisions on hydrological simulations in West Lake Erie Basin. Hydrol. Process. 2015, 29, 5307-5320.
23. Texas A&M University. Soil and Water Assessment Tool. ArcSWAT Interface and documentations. Available online: http://swat.tamu.edu/software/arcswat/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
24. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Atmosphere Deposition-National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP). Available online: http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
25. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Practices, Climate-Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM). Available online: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/climate/prism.html (accessed on 19 February 2016).
26. United States Geological Survey, Land Use (non-agricultural)-National Land Cover Database (NLCD). Available online: http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd06_data.php (accessed on 19 February 2016).
27. United States Department of Agriculture; National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Land Use-Cropland Data Layer (Agricultural). Available online: http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
28. United States Corps pf Engineers, Reservoirs-National Inventory of Dams (NID). Available online: http://nid.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=838:5:0::NO (accessed on 19 February 2016).
29. United States Geological Survey, River Discharge Data. Available online: http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis (accessed on 19 February 2016).
30. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Practices, State Soil Geographic Data. Available online: http://sdmdataaccess.nrcs.usda.gov/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
31. United States Geological Survey, Global Data Explorer. Available online: http://gdex.cr.usgs.gov/gdex/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
32. United States Geological Survey, Water Usage Data. Available online: http://water.usgs.gov/watuse/data/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
33. Michael, W.; Harmel, J.; Daren, R.; Arnold, J.G.; Williams, J.R. SWAT Check: A screening tool to assist users in the identification of potential model application problems. J. Environ. Qual. 2014, 43, 208-214.
34. United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Environmental Impact and Benefits Assessment for Final Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Category; Office ofWater: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
35. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. Water Quality for Citizens. Available online: http://www.epa.illinois.gov/(accessed on 19 February 2016).
36. Daggupati, P.; Pai, N.; Ale, S.; Douglas-Mankin, K.R.; Zeckoski, R.W.; Jeong, J.; Parajuli, P.B.; Saraswat, D.; Youssef, M.A. A recommended calibration and validation strategy for hydrologic and water quality models. Trans. ASABE 2015, 58, 1705-1719.
37. Nash, J.E.; Sutcliffe, J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10, 282-290.
38. Dungjen, T.; Patch, D. Toledo-area Water Advisory Expected to Continue through Sunday as Leaders Await Tests. The Blade. Available online: http://www.toledoblade.com/local/2014/08/02/City-of-Toledo-issues-do-no-drink-water-advisery.html (accessed on 19 February 2016).