A reduced-dimension fMRI shared response model

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 460-468

  Chen, Po Hsuan ^a   Chen, Janice ^b   Yeshurun, Yaara ^b   Hasson, Uri ^b   Haxby, James V ^c   Ramadge, Peter J ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Dartmouth College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; INFORMATION SCIENCE;

BRAIN REGIONS; FMRI DATA; GROUP DIFFERENCES; RESPONSE MODEL;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84965175180     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. J. Talairach and P. Tournoux. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3-Dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. Thieme, 1988.
2. J. D. G. Watson, R. Myers, et al. Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex, 3:79-94, 1993.
3. R. B. H. Tootell, J. B. Reppas, et al. Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature, 375(6527):139-141, 05 1995.
4. J. Mazziotta, A. Toga, et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 356(1412):1293-1322, 2001.
5. B. Fischl, M. I. Sereno, R. B. H. Tootell, and A. M. Dale. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Human brain mapping, 8(4):272-284, 1999.
6. M. Brett, I. S. Johnsrude, and A. M. Owen. The problem of functional localization in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci, 3(3):243-249, 03 2002.
7. M. R. Sabuncu, B. D. Singer, B. Conroy, R. E. Bryan, P. J. Ramadge, and J. V. Haxby. Function-based intersubject alignment of human cortical anatomy. Cerebral Cortex, 20(1):130-140, 2010.
8. B. R. Conroy, B. D. Singer, J. V. Haxby, and P. J. Ramadge. fMRI-based inter-subject cortical alignment using functional connectivity. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2009.
9. B. R. Conroy, B. D. Singer, J. S. Guntupalli, P. J. Ramadge, and J. V. Haxby. Inter-subject alignment of human cortical anatomy using functional connectivity. NeuroImage, 2013.
10. J. V. Haxby, J. S. Guntupalli, et al. A common, high-dimensional model of the representational space in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuron, 72(2):404-416, 2011.
11. A. Lorbert and P. J. Ramadge. Kernel hyperalignment. In Adv. in Neural Inform. Proc. Systems, 2012.
12. A. G. Huth, T. L. Griffiths, F. E. Theunissen, and J. L. Gallant. PrAGMATiC: a Probabilistic and Generative Model of Areas Tiling the Cortex. ArXiv 1504.03622, 2015.
13. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson. Matrix analysis. Cambridge university press, 2012.
14. A. Edelman, T. A. Arias, and S. T. Smith. The geometry of algorithms with orthogonality constraints. SIAM journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 20(2):303-353, 1998.
15. J.-H. Ahn and J.-H. Oh. A constrained EM algorithm for principal component analysis. Neural Computation, 15(1):57-65, 2003.
16. J. R. Manning, R. Ranganath, K. A. Norman, and D. M. Blei. Topographic factor analysis: a bayesian model for inferring brain networks from neural data. PLoS One, 9(5):e94914, 2014.
17. A. M. Michael, M. Anderson, et al. Preserving subject variability in group fMRI analysis: performance evaluation of GICA vs. IVA. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 8, 2014.
18. H. Xu, A. Lorbert, P. J. Ramadge, J. S. Guntupalli, and J. V. Haxby. Regularized hyperalignment of multi-set fMRI data. In Proc. Statistical Signal Processing Workshop, pages 229-232. IEEE, 2012.
19. H. Hotelling. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 28(3-4):321-377, 1936.
20. A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja. Independent component analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
21. J. Chen, Y. C. Leong, K. A. Norman, and U. Hasson. Reinstatement of neural patterns during narrative free recall. Abstracts of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, 2014.
22. D. S. Margulies, J. L. Vincent, and et al. Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(47):20069-20074, 2009.
23. J. V. Haxby, M. I. Gobbini, M. L. Furey, A. Ishai, J. L. Schouten, and P. Pietrini. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293(5539), 2001.
24. M. Hanke, F. J. Baumgartner, et al. A high-resolution 7-Tesla fMRI dataset from complex natural stimulation with an audio movie. Scientific Data, 1, 2014.
25. T. D. Griffiths and J. D. Warren. The planum temporale as a computational hub. Trends in neurosciences, 25(7):348-353, 2002.
26. Y. Yeshurun, S. Swanson, J. Chen, E. Simony, C. Honey, P. C. Lazaridi, and U. Hasson. How does the brain represent different ways of understanding the same story? Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 2014.
27. M. E. Raichle. The brain's default mode network. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 38(1), 2015.
28. D. L. Ames, C. J. Honey, M. Chow, A. Todorov, and U. Hasson. Contextual alignment of cognitive and neural dynamics. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014.
29. M. T. de Bettencourt, J. D. Cohen, R. F. Lee, K. A. Norman, and N. B. Turk-Browne. Closed-loop training of attention with real-time brain imaging. Nature neuroscience, 18(3):470-475, 2015.