Searching for social sustainability: The case of the shrinking city of Heerlen, the Netherlands

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages

  Ročak, Maja ^a,b   Hospers, Gert Jan ^b,c   Reverda, Nol ^a  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Shrinking cities; Social capital; Social sustainability

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; EMPOWERMENT; ENTREPRENEUR; FUTURE PROSPECT; POLITICS; SHRINKAGE; SOCIAL CAPITAL; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84965103035     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su8040382     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. In this paper we use the terms "urban shrinkage" and "shrinking cities" as synonyms.
2. Aber, J.; Yahagi, H. Emerging regeneration strategies in the US, Europe and lapan. In Shrinking Cities. International Perspectives and Policy Implications; Pallagst, K., Wiechman, T., Martinez-Fernandez, C, Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 257-278.
3. This definition is based on the definition of sustainability in the special issue of this journal "Sustaining the shrinking city" as well as the theoretical approach presented in Sections 2 and 3.1.
4. Putnam, R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NI, USA, 1993.
5. Haase, D. Urban ecology of shrinking cities: An unrecognized opportunity? Nat. Cult. 2008, 3, 1-8.
6. Wiechmann, T. Errors expected-Aligning urban strategy with demographic uncertainty in shrinking cities. Int. Plann. Stud. 2008, 13, 431-446.
7. Rink, D.; Haase, A.; Bernt, M. Shrink Smart. Fp7 Project. Workpackagel: Specification of Working Model; Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research: Leipzig, Germany, 2009.
8. Haase, A.; Maas, A.; Kabisch, S.; Steinführer, A. From long-term decline to new diversity: Sociodemographic change in Polish and Czech inner cities. J. Urban. Regen. Renew. 2009, 3, 31-45.
9. Pallagst, K. Viewpoint: The planning research agenda: Shrinking cities-A challenge for planning cultures. Town Plan. Rev. 2010.
10. Gross, M. Population decline and the new nature: Towards experimental "refactoring" in landscape development of post-industrial regions. Futures 2008, 40, 451-459.
11. Mulligan, H. Environmental sustainability issues for shrinking cities: US and Europe. In Shrinking Cities. International Perspectives and Policy Implications; Pallagst, K., Wiechman, T., Martinez-Fernandez, C, Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
12. Deng, C; Ma, J. Viewing urban decay from the sky: A multi-scale analysis of residential4 vacancy in a shrinking U.S. City. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 2015, 141, 88-99.
13. In this paper we refer to social capital by using the term "social aspects".
14. Rocak, M.; Hospers, G.J.; Reverda, N. Civic action and urban shrinkage: Exploring the link. J. Urban. Regen. Renew. 2015. accepted for publication.
15. Hospers, GJ.; Reverda, N. Managing Population Decline in Europe's Urban and Rural Areas; (Springer Briefs in Population Studies); Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015.
16. Hospers, G.-J. Policy responses to urban shrinkage: From growth thinking to civic engagement. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2014,22,1-17.
17. Hannemann, C. Rettet soziales Kapital schrumpfende Stâdte? In Schrumpfende Stiidte H Handlungskonzepte; Oswalt, P., Ed.; Hatje Cantz Verlag: Ostfildern, Germany, 2005; pp. 484-488.
18. Tsutsumi, K. "Social Ties and "Social Capital" in Areas under Shrinking and Marginalization Process in Japan; MARG (Marginal Areas Research Group, Graduate School of Urban Management, Kyoto Univ.): Kyoto, Japan, 2009.
19. Haase, A.; Hospers, G.-J.; Pekelsma, S.; Rink, D. Shrinking Areas, Front-Runners in Innovative Citizen Participation; EUKN: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2012.
20. Faber, K; Oswalt, P. Raumpioniere in liindlichen Regionen. Neue Wege der Daseinsvorsorge, Spector books: Gôttingen, Germany, 2013.
21. For example, oversized infrastructure and financial austerity.
22. Dempsey N.; Bramley G.; Power, S.; Brown, C. The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustain. Dev. 2011,19, 289-300.
23. Koning, J. Social sustainability in a globalizing world context, theory and methodology explored. In Proceedings of the UNESCO/MOST meeting, The Hague, The Netherlands, 22-23 November 2001.
24. Partridge, E. "Social sustainability": A useful theoretical framework? In Proceedings of the Australasian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Dunedin, New Zealand, 28-30 September 2005.
25. Rogers, S.; Gardner, K.; Carlson, C. Social capital and walkability as social aspects of sustainability. Sustainability 2013, 5, 3473-3483.
26. Weingaertner, C; Moberg, A. Exploring social sustainability: Learning from perspectives on urban development and companies and products. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 22,122-133.
27. UN World urbanization prospects. Available online: http://esa.un.org/unup/ (accessed on 30 May 2013).
28. Oswalt, P. Shrinking Cities Volume 1: International Research; ARCH Verlag GmbH: Aachen, Germany, 2006.
29. Feldhoff, T. Shrinking communities in Japan: Community ownership of assets as a development potential for rural Japan? Urban. Des. Int. 2013,18, 99-109.
30. Hara, T. A shrinking society. In Post-Demographic Transition in Japan; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2015.
31. Sousa, S. Planning for shrinking cities in Portugal; University of Oporto: Oporto, Portugal, 2010.
32. Population projections. Available online: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/publications/population_projections (accessed on 10 December 2012).
33. Hoekveld, J.J. Urban Decline within the Region. Understanding the intra-regional Differentiation in Urban Population Development in the Declining Regions Saarland and Southern-Limburg; Universiteit van Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014.
34. Martinez-Fernandez, C; Audirac, I.; Fol, S.; Cunningham-Sabot, E. Shrinking cities: Urban challenges of globalization. Int. J. Urban. Reg. Res. 2012, 36, 213-225.
35. Couch, C; Karecha, J.; Nuissl, H.; Rink, D. Decline and sprawl: An evolving type of urban development-observed in Liverpool and Leipzig. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2005,13,117-136.
36. Hâussermann, H.; Siebel, W. De schrumpfende Stadt und die Stadtsoziologie. In Soziologische Stadtforschung; Friedrichs, J., Ed.; Westdeutscher Verlag: Kôln, Germany, 1988.
37. Schilling, J.; Logan, J. Greening the Rust Belt: A green infrastructure model for right sizing America's shrinking cities. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2008, 74, 451-466.
38. Pallagst, K; Wiechman, T.; Martinez-Fernandez, C. Shrinking Cities. International Perspectives and Policy Implications; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
39. Martinez-Frenandez, C; Kubo, N.; Noya, A.; Weyman, T. Demographic Change and Local Development: Shrinkage, Regeneration and Social Dynamics; OECD/LEED: Paris, France, 2012.
40. Rumpel, P.; Slach, O; Koutsky, J. Shrinking cities and governance of economic regeneration: The case of Ostrava. Econ. Manag. 2013, 6,113-128.
41. Hospers, G.J. Coping with shrinkage in Europe's cities and towns. Urban. Des. Int. 2013,18, 78-89.
42. Hoekveld, J.J. Spatial differentiation of population development in a declining region: The case of Saarland Geografiska. Annaler. Ser. B Hum. Geogr. 2015, 97, 47-68.
43. Cunningham-Sabot, E.; Roth, H. Growth paradigm against urban shrinkage: A standardized fight? The cases of Glasgow (UK) and Saint-Etienne (France). In Shrinking Cities. International Perspectives and Policy Implications; Pallagst, K, Wiechman, T, Martinez-Fernandez, C, Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 99-124.
44. Kabisch, S.; Haase, A.; Haase, D. Beyond growth Urban Development in Shrinking Cities as a Challenge for Modeling Approaches; UFZ: Leipzig, Germany, 2006.
45. Córtese, C; Haase, A.; Grossmann, K.; Ticha, I. Governing social cohesion in shrinking cities: The cases of Ostrava, Genoa and Leipzig. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2013, 22,1-17.
46. Rocak, M. Social aspects of demographic change in international perspective: The example of the Dart project. In Migracje Mieszkancow Duzych Miast; Golata, E., Ed.; University of Poznan, Faculty of Economics: Poznan, Poland, 2013; pp. 55-74.
47. Albecker, M.-E; Fol, S. The restructuring of declining suburbs in the Paris region. In Shrinking Cities. International Perspectives and Policy Implications; Pallagst, K., Wiechman, T., Martinez-Fernandez, C, Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
48. Hospers, G.J. Place marketing in shrinking Europe: Some geographical notes. Tijdschr. Voor Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2011,102, 369-375.
49. Leetmaa, K.; Kriszan, A.; Nuga, M.; Burdack, J. Strategies to cope with shrinkage in the lower end of the urban hierarchy in Estonia and central Germany. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2013, 23,1-19.
50. Hoist Laursen, L.L. Shrinking cities or urban transformation!; Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 2008.
51. For example, the database Web of Science recognizes 11,641 results (journal articles) with the keywords "social capital." In turn, a Google Scholar search gives almost three million hits. Available online: http://scholar.google.nl/scholar?hl=nl&q=social+capital&btnG=&lr= (accessed on 23 September 2015).
52. Lovell, S.A. Social capital: The panacea for community? Geogr. Compass 2009, 3, 781-796.
53. For further explanations of social capital theories see, for example, Portes [54].
54. Portes, A. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1998,24,1-24.
55. Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education; Richardson, J.G., Ed.; Greenwood: New York, NY, USA, 1985; pp. 241-258.
56. Coleman, J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. }. Sociol. 1988, 94, S95-S120.
57. Coleman, J.S. Foundations of Social Theory; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990.
58. Putnam, R. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. J. Democr. 2000, 6, 65-78.
59. Safford, S. Why the Garden Club Couldn't Save Youngstown: Civic Infrastructure and Mobilization in Economic Crises; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Industrial Performance Center: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004.
60. Hospers, G.-J.; Van Lochem, M. Social capital and prosperity: searching for a missing link. New Econ. 2002, 9, 52-56.
61. Magis, K. Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2010, 23, 401-416.
62. Bramley G.; Power, S. Urban form and social sustainability: The role of density and housing type. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 2009, 36, 30-48.
63. Grootaert, C. Social Capital: The Missing Link?; The World Bank: Bruxelles, Belgium, 1998.
64. Noll, H.-H. Towards a European system of social indicators: Theoretical framework and system architecture. Soc. Indie. Res. 2002, 58, 47-87.
65. Colantonio, A.; Dixon, T. Measuring Socially Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Europe; Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD), School of the Built Environment Oxford Brookes University: Oxford, UK, 2009.
66. Ahman, H. Social sustainability-Society at the intersection of development and maintenance. Local Environ. 2013,18,1153-1166.
67. Serageldin, I. Sustainability and the Wealth of Nations: First Steps in an Ongoing Journey; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
68. Reverda, N. Population decline and ageing in Europe: The need to recycle human and social capital. In Human rights and social equality: Challenges for social work; Hessle, S., Ed.; Ashgate: Surrey, UK, 2014.
69. World Bank Social capital. Available online: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALDEVELOPMENT/EXTTSOCIALCAPITAL/0.,contentMDK:20185164~menuPK:418217~pagePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:401015,00.html (accessed on 22 April 2012).
70. Parkhe, A. "Messy" research, methodological predispositions, and theory development in international joint ventures. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1993,18, 227-268.
71. Forrest, R.; Kearns, A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban. Stud. (Routledge) 2001, 38, 2125-2143.
72. Colantonio and Dixon [65] divide social sustainability into 10 dimensions: demographic change (ageing, migration, and mobility); education and skills, sense of place, and culture; participation, empowerment, and access; social capital; social mixing and cohesion; and wellbeing, happiness, and quality of life. Together they use these elements to determine the state of social conditions in a community. In this paper we focus on social capital, which also includes sense of place and culture, participation, empowerment, wellbeing, happiness, and quality of life. Other indicators were included in the local context and urban shrinkage indicators, see the conceptual framework in Figure 2.
73. We look at population decline, ageing, and economic transformation as a context of this study and explore how people experience this and how it impacts their social capital.
74. In this study we look at history, geographical characteristics, national context, local policies, and regeneration strategies.
75. Dumreicher, PL; Kolb, B. Place as a social space: Fields of encounter relating to the local sustainability process. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 87, 317-328.
76. Cooke, P. Locality, economic restructuring and world development. In Localities: The Changing Face of Urban Britain; Cooke, P., Ed.; Unwin Hyman: London, UK, 1989; pp. 1-44.
77. Bowns, C. Shrinkage happens ... in small towns too! Responding to de-population and loss of place in susquehanna river towns. Urban Des. Int. 2013,18, 61-77.
78. Luescher, A.; Shetty, S. An introductory review to the special issue: Shrinking cities and towns: Challenge and responses. Urban. Des. Int. 2013,18,1-5.
79. Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30,1-10.
80. Hargreaves, A. Building communities of place: Habitual movement around significant places. J. Hous. Built Environ. 2004,19, 49-65.
81. Woolever, C. A contextual approach to neighborhood attachment. Urban. Stud. 1992, 29, 99-116.
82. Macnaghten, P.; Jacobs, M. Public identification with sustainable development: Investigating cultural barriers to participation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 1997, 7, 5-24.
83. Arnstein, S. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 1969, 35, 216-224.
84. Informal participation refers to social participation (without a "written contract"). Informal networks refer to unregulated exchanges among people. Formal networks often refer to associations with clearly defined structures, demonstrated by the belonging to or membership of an organization.
85. Also referred to as civic action.
86. Mayer, H.; Rnox, P. Small-town sustainability: Prospects in the second modernity. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2010,18, 1545-1565.
87. Martinez-Fernandez, C; Wu, C. Shrinking cities: A global overview and concerns about Australian mining cities cases. In The Future of Shrinking Cities: Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation in a Global Context; Centre for Global Metropolitan Studies, Institute of Urban and Regional Development: Wurster, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2009.
88. In this paper we refer to Heerlen as a shrinking city. Due to its size, in terms of population (see Table 1) one could argue that the concept of town would fit better to describe the scale of Heerlen. However, we mostly refer to it as a shrinking city to place it more appropriately in the international urban shrinkage debate.
89. Giffinger, et al. [90] defined "medium-sized" cities on a European scale as city regions of less than 500,000 inhabitants. However, the meaning of "medium-sized" depends on the scale one uses. In the Dutch context [91], as well as in the context of many European shrinking urban areas, cities with population of 50,000 to 100,000 inhabitants can be perceived as medium-sized.
90. Giffinger, R.; Fertner, C; Kramar, H.; Meijers, E. City-Ranking of European Medium-Sized cities; Centre of Regional Science: Vienna, Austria, 2008.
91. CBS. Toename Geweldsdelicten in Middelgrote Steden. Available online: http://statline.cbs.nl (accessed on 14 March 2016).
92. George, A.L.; Bennett, A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005.
93. Yin, R.K. Case study research. In Design and Methods, 4th éd.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007.
94. CBS Statline. Available online: http://statline.cbs.nl (accessed on 22 February 2015).
95. Gemeente Heerlen. Stadsvisie Heerlen 2026. In Centrumstad, Ondernemende Stad, Jeugdige Stad, Netwerkstad, Energiek Hart van Parkstad; Gemeente Heerlen: Heerlen, The Netherlands, 2008.
96. Gemeente Heerlen. Gemeente Heerlen Kerncijfers; Gemeente Heerlen: Heerlen, The Netherlands, 2015.
97. Heerlen Stad & Bestuur. Available online: http://www.heerlen.nl/StadenBestuur.html (accessed on 2 May 2015).
98. Baydar, O. Krimpgemeenten: Meer Ouderen en Westerse Allochtonen; CBS: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2012.
99. Provincie Limburg. Rapportage bevolkingsonderzoek, Limburg 2006; Provincie Limburg: Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2006.
100. Peet, J. Mijnsluiting en herstructurering. In Mijnwerkers in Limburg. Een Sociale Geschiedenis; Rnotter, A., Ed.; Vantilt: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2013.
101. Rutten, W.; Langeweg, S. Verenigingsleven en vrijetijdsbesteding. In Mijnwerkers in Limburg een Sociale Geschidenis; Rnotter, A., Ed.; Vantilt: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2013. (In Dutch).
102. The state is represented by policy-makers, the market by entrepreneurs and civil society by citizens.
103. Reverda, N. Regionalisering en Mondialisering, Eubron: Delft, The Netherlands, 2004. (In Dutch).
104. Interviews were conducted with 18 citizens with different roles and demographic characteristics (four of whom were entrepreneurs) and six policy-makers (two of whom were citizens of Heerlen).
105. According to relevant background indicators as defined in social capital studies.
106. Dudwick, N.; Kuehnast, K.; Nyhan Jones, V.; Woolock, M. Analyzing Social Capital in Context. A Guide to Using Qualitative Methods and Data; World Bank Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
107. With regard to age, gender, and socio economic status (based on income, education, and occupation).
108. Fielding, N.; Fielding, J. Linking Data: The Articulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Social Research; Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, USA, 1986.
109. Bryman, A. Social Research Methods; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012.
110. The first author.
111. Based on the operationalization of concepts from Section 2.
112. Starrin, B.; Dahlgren, L.; Larsson, G.; Styrborn, S. Along the Path of Discovery. Qualitative Methods and Grunded Theory; Studentlitteratur: Lund, Sweden, 1997.
113. Miles, M.; Huberman, A.M.; Saldana, J. Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook; Sage: London, UK, 2014.
114. Etil Bevolkingsprognose Zuid Limburg. Available online: http://www.vanmeernaarbeter.nl/ (accessed on 5 November 2012).
115. Elzerman, K; Bontje, M. Urban shrinkage in Parkstad Limburg. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2015, 23, 87-103.
116. Latten, J.; Musterd, S. De nieuwe groei heet krimp: Een PerspectiefVoor Parkstad Limburg; NICIS: Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2009. (In Dutch).
117. Verwest, F. Demographic decline and local government strategies; Erasmus University: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
118. Hoekveld, J.J.; Bontje, M. Intra-regional differentiation of population development in Southern-Limburg, The Netherlands. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2015.
119. In four (out of 23) neighborhoods the population grew.
120. Marlet, G.; van Woerkens, C. Atlas Voor Gemeenten 2015; VOC Uitgevers: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2015.
121. The quotes in this study are used to illustrate the interviewees' knowledge of everyday life. They are therefore not meant to be generalizable.
122. Pallagst, K.; Aber, J.; Audirac, I.; Cunningham-Sabot, E.; Fol, S.; Martinez-Fernandez, C; Moraes, S.; Mulligan, H; Vargas-Hernandez, J.; Wiechmann, T.; et al. The Future of Shrinking Cities Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation in a Global Context; Institute of Urban and Regional Development: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2009.
123. Molotch, H; Freudenburg, W; Paulsen, K.E. History repeats itself, but how? City character, urban tradition, and the accomplishment of place. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2000, 65, 791-823.
124. Hospers, G.-J. Krimp; SUN: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010.
125. Aber, J. The creative imperative in a postindustrial economy to foster a more sustainable development is shrinking cities. In The Future of Shrinking Cities: Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation; Pallagst, K, Aber, J., Eds.; Institute of Urban and Regional Development, IURD: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2006.
126. IBA Parkstad is a project initiated for the transformation of the Parkstad area. It deals with transformation in a physical sense but also addresses transition in thinking and entrepreneurship. Everyone is invited to participate with project ideas (organizations and citizens), while the best ideas are rewarded with financial support.
127. IBA Parkstad. Available online: http://www.iba-parkstad.nl/(accessed on 11 November 2015).
128. Sniekers, M.; Rocak, M. Jonge vrouwen en stadsvernieuwing in Heerlen. Rooilijn 2015, 48, 321-327.
129. Schmeets, H.; Arts, K. Limburg Blijft in Sociaal Kapitaal Achter bij Rest Van Nederland, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek: Heerlen, The Netherlands, 2010. (In Dutch).
130. Radar is an organization that works with people with disabilities.
131. Boonstra, B.; Boelens, L. Self-organization in urban development: Towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban. Res. Pract. 2011, 4, 99-122.
132. In the words of our interviewees: many old people on the street, empty shops in the city center, empty homes in certain neighborhoods, Ntc.
133. Elshof, H.; Bailey, A. The role of responses to experiences of rural population decline in the social capital of families. J. Rural Community Dev. 2015,10, 72-93.
134. Strohmeier, K.P.; Bader, S. Demographic decline, segregation, and social urban renewal in old industrial metropolitan areas. German]. Urban. Stud. 2004, 44,1-14.
135. Hollander, J.B. Contemporary perceptions of nine decades of depopulation in new Bedford, Massachusetts. Urban. Des. Int. 2013, 18, 6-23.