Corrigendum: Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data [Age and Ageing, 45, 3, (2016) (353-360)] DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw039;Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data

Age and Ageing

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 353-360

  Clegg, Andrew ^a   Bates, Chris ^b   Young, John ^a   Ryan, Ronan ^c   Nichols, Linda ^c   Ann Teale, Elizabeth ^a   Mohammed, Mohammed A ^d   Parry, John ^e   Marshall, Tom ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b TPP   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cumulative deficit; Electronic frailty index; Electronic health record; Frailty; Older people; Primary care

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; ELECTRONIC FRAILTY INDEX; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NURSING HOME; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL ISOLATION; VULNERABLE POPULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HOME FOR THE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HOMES FOR THE AGED; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING HOMES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84965041780     PISSN: 00020729     EISSN: 14682834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afx001     Document Type: Erratum

References (26)

1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Olde-Rikkert M, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013; 381: 752-62.
2. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al. Frailty in older adults:evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56: M146-56.
3. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A, Song X, Steen B, Skoog I. Long-term risks of death and institutionalization of elderly people in relation to deficit accumulation at age 70. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54: 975-9.
4. Rodriguez-Manas L, Fried LP. Frailty in the clinical scenario. Lancet 2014; 385: e7-9.
5. Turner G, Clegg A. Best practice guidelines for the management of frailty: a British Geriatrics Society, Age UK and Royal College of General Practitioners report. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 744-7.
6. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013; 14: 392-7.
7. Clegg A, Rogers L, Young J. Diagnostic test accuracy of simple instruments for identifying frailty in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing 2015; 44: 148-52.
8. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal 2001; 1: 323-36.
9. Song X, Mitnitski A, Rockwood K. Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58: 681-7.
10. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 2008; 8: 24.
11. Health and Social Care Information Centre. http://systems. hscic.gov.uk/data/uktc/readcodes (23 November 2014, date last accessed).
12. de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 253-63.
13. ResearchOne Health and Care Database. Available from http://www.researchone.org (1 June 2014, date last accessed).
14. The Health Information Network Database. Available from http://www.thin-uk.com (1 June 2014, date last accessed).
15. SystmOne Electronic Health Record System. Available from http://www.tpp-uk.com/products/systmone (1 June 2014, date last accessed).
16. INPS Vision IT Solution. Available from http://www.inps.co. uk/vision (1 June 2014, date last accessed).
17. Dawes R. The robust beauty of improper linear modelling in decision making. Am Psychol 1979; 34: 571-82.
18. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005; 173: 489-95.
19. Maguire A, Blak BT, Thompson M. The importance of defining periods of complete mortality reporting for research using automated data from primary care. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009; 18: 76-83.
20. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/ (1 June 2014, date last accessed).
21. Health and Social Care Information Centre Technology Reference data Update Distribution site. Available from https://isd.hscic.gov.uk/trud3/user/guest/group/0/home.
22. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2011.
23. Yorkshire and Humber Academic Health Science Network Improvement Academy. Available from http://www. improvementacademy.org/improving-quality/healthy-ageing. html (1st December 2016, date last accessed).
24. Handforth C, Clegg A, Young C et al. The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1091-101.
25. Rockwood K, Theou O, Mitnitski A. What are frailty instruments for? Age Ageing 2015; 44: 545-7.
26. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Predicting risk of emergency admission to hospital using primary care data: derivation and validation of QAdmissions score. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003482.