Comprehensive risk evaluation of long-distance oil and gas transportation pipelines using a fuzzy Petri net model

Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

Volumn 33, Issue , 2016, Pages 18-29

  Guo, Yanbao ^a,b   Meng, Xiaoli ^a   Wang, Deguo ^a,b   Meng, Tao ^a,c   Liu, Shuhai ^a,b   He, Renyang ^c  

^a CHINA UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM   (China)

^b Beijing Key Laboratory of Process Fluid Filtration and Separation   (China)

^c China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute   (China)

Author keywords

Combination weighting method; Fuzzy Petri nets; Fuzzy transformation rules; Oil and gas pipelines; Risk evaluation

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FUZZY SYSTEMS; GAS PIPELINES; GASES; OFFSHORE PIPELINES; PETRI NETS; PIPELINES; RISK MANAGEMENT;

COMBINATION WEIGHTING METHOD; FUZZY PETRI NETS; OIL-AND-GAS PIPELINES; RISK EVALUATION; TRANSFORMATION RULES;

PETROLEUM TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 84964950001     PISSN: 18755100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.052     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aminbakhsh S., Gunduz M., Sonmez R. Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. J. Saf. Res. 2013, 46:99-105.
2. Atanassov K., Dimitrov D., Atanassova V. Algorithms for tokens transfer in the different types of intuitionistic fuzzy generalized nets. Cybern. Inf. Technol. 2010, 10(4):22-35.
3. Bharathi V., Pramod D., Raman R. A conceptual model for ERP failure prediction using fuzzy Petri-nets for small and medium enterprises. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2012, 87(3):330-338.
4. Bharathi V., Pramod D., Raman R. A fuzzy Petri-net based conceptual model for risk prediction in enterprise resource planning (ERP) acquisition decisions for small and medium enterprises. J. Comput. Sci. 2013, 9(1):139-146.
5. Brito A.J., de Almeida A.T. Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94:187-198.
6. Chen W.L., Kan C.D., Lin C.H., Chen T. A rule-based decision-making diagnosis system to evaluate arteriovenous shunt stenosis for hemodialysis treatment of patients using fuzzy petri nets. Biomed. Health Inf. IEEE J. 2014, 18(2):703-713.
7. Chen T., Jin Y., Qiu X., Chen X. A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for safety assessment of food-waste feed based on entropy and the analytic hierarchy process methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41(16):7328-7337.
8. Cheng Y.H., Yang L.A. A Fuzzy Petri Nets approach for railway traffic control in case of abnormality: evidence from Taiwan railway system. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(4):8040-8048.
9. Dong Y.H., Yu D.T. Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2005, 18:83-88.
10. Fatoorehchi H., Abolghasemi H. Finding all real roots of a polynomial by matrix algebra and the Adomian decomposition method. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2014, 22(3):524-528.
11. Fatoorehchi H., Abolghasemi H. On computation of real eigenvalues of matrices via the Adomian decomposition. J. Egypt. Math. Soc. 2014, 22(1):6-10.
12. Fatoorehchi H., Rach R., Tavakoli O., Abolghasemi H. An efficient numerical scheme to solve a quintic equation of state for supercritical fluids. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2015, 202(3):402-407.
13. Guo X., Huang W., Yang F. Notice of retraction power coal supply chain risk analysis method research based risk element transmission Petri net. Education Technology and Computer Science (ETCS), Second International Workshop on IEEE 2010, 3:244-247.
14. Han Z.Y., Weng W.G. Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189(1):509-518.
15. Jamshidi A., Yazdani-Chamzini A., Yakhchali S.H., Khaleghi S. Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2013, 26(1):197-208.
16. Jiang Y., Zhang Q. A fuzzy comprehensive assessment system of dam failure risk based on cloud model. J. Comput. 2013, 8(4):1043-1049.
17. Khakzad N., Khan F., Amyotte P. Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96(8):925-932.
18. Kim C.E., Ju Y.J., Gens M. Multilevel fault tree analysis using fuzzy numbers. Comput. Op. Res. 1996, 23(7):695-703.
19. Knezevic J., Odoom E.R. Reliability modelling of repairable systems using Petri nets and fuzzy Lambda-Tau methodology. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2001, 73(1):1-17.
20. Lavasani S.M., Ramzali N., Sabzalipour F., Akyuz E. Utilisation of Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA) for quantified risk analysis of leakage in abandoned oil and natural-gas wells. Ocean. Eng. 2015, 108:729-737.
21. Li X., Lara-Rosano F. Adaptive fuzzy Petri nets for dynamic knowledge representation and inference. Expert Syst. Appl. 2000, 19(3):235-241.
22. Li X., Wang K., Liu L., Xin J., Yang H., Gao C. Application of the entropy weight and TOPSIS method in safety evaluation of coal mines. Procedia Eng. 2011, 26:2085-2091.
23. Li L., Liu L., Yang C., Li Z. The comprehensive evaluation of smart distribution grid based on cloud model. Energy Procedia 2012, 17:96-102.
24. Li M.W., Hong W.C., Kang H.G. Urban traffic flow forecasting using Gauss-SVR with cat mapping, cloud model and PSO hybrid algorithm. Neuro Comput. 2013, 99:230-240.
25. Liu C., Feng M., Dai X., Li D. A new algorithm of backward cloud. Acta Simul. Syst. Sin. 2004, 16(11):2417-2419.
26. Lu L., Liang W., Zhang L., Zhang H., Lu Z., Shan J. A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 25:124-133.
27. Luo S., Liu G., Zhang B., Guo H. Evaluation model of digital map quality based on cloud model. J. Geomat. Sci. Technol. 2008, 25(2):123-126.
28. Milinković S., Marković M., Vesković S., Ivić M., Pavlović N. A fuzzy Petri net model to estimate train delays. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2013, 33:144-157.
29. Németh E., Bartha T., Fazekas C., Hangos K.M. Verification of a primary-to-secondary leaking safety procedure in a nuclear power plant using coloured Petri nets. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94(5):942-953.
30. Nguyen T.P.K., Beugin J., Marais J. Method for evaluating an extended Fault Tree to analyse the dependability of complex systems. Application to a satellite-based railway system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2015, 133:300-313.
31. Rao K.D., Gopika V., Rao V.S., Kushwaha H.S., Verma A.K., Srividya A. Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94(4):872-883.
32. Ribarić S., Hrkać T. A knowledge representation and reasoning based on Petri nets with spatio-temporal tokens. EUROCON 2007 The International Conference on "Computer as a Tool" IEEE 2007, 793-800.
33. Shahriar A., Sadiq R., Tesfamariam S. Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: a sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2012, 25(3):505-523.
34. Wu Y., Xie L., Yue Y. Study on fault analysis technology by means of petri nets. Int. J. Perform. Eng. 2010, 6(3):269.
35. Wu J., Yan S., Xie L. Reliability analysis method of a solar array by using fault tree analysis and fuzzy reasoning Petri net. Acta Astronaut. 2011, 69(11):960-968.
36. Xie C., Dong D., Hua S., Xu X., Chen Y. Safety evaluation of smart grid based on AHP-entropy method. Syst. Eng. Procedia 2012, 4:203-209.
37. Yang H.T., Huang C.M. Distribution system service restoration using fuzzy Petri net models. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2002, 24(5):395-403.
38. Zhang L., Wu X., Chen Q., Skibniewski M., Zhang J. Developing a cloud model based risk assessment methodology for tunnel-induced damage to existing pipelines. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2015, 29(2):513-526.