Examining a health care price transparency tool: Who uses it, and how they shop for care

Health Affairs

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 662-670

  Sinaiko, Anna D ^a   Rosenthal, Meredith B ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHILDBIRTH; CONSUMER; HUMAN; IMAGING; OUTPATIENT; AGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST CONTROL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; INSURANCE; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; COST SAVINGS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH SERVICES; HUMANS; INSURANCE BENEFITS; INSURANCE COVERAGE; INSURANCE, HEALTH; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84964940295     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0746     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. White C, Ginsburg PB, Tu HT, Reschovsky JD, Smith JM, Liao K. Healthcare price transparency: policy approaches and estimated impacts on spending [Internet]. Washington (DC): WestHealth Policy Center;2014 May [cited 2016 Feb 1]. (Policy Analysis). Available from: http://www.westhealth.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/05/Price-Transparency-Policy-Analysis-FINAL-5-2-14.pdf.
2. Government Accountability Office. Heath care transparency: actions needed to improve cost and quality information for consumers [Internet]. Washington (DC): 2014 Oct [cited 2016 Feb 1]. Available from: http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/666572.pdf.
3. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Health Research and Educational Trust. 2014 Employer Health Benefits Survey [Internet]. Menlo Park (CA): KFF;2014 [cited 2016 Feb 1]. Available from: http://kff.org/health-costs/report/2014-employer-health-benefits-survey/.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2015 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; reasonable compensation equivalents for physician services in excluded hospitals and certain teaching hospitals; provider administrative appeals and judicial review; enforcement provisions for organ transplant centers; and electronic health record (EHR) incentive program. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2014;79(163): 49853-50536.
5. Catalyst for Payment Reform, Health Care Incentives Improvement Institute. Report card on state price transparency laws [Internet]. Berkeley (CA): CPR;2014 Mar 25 [cited 2016 Feb 1]. Available from: http://www.catalyzepaymentreform.org/images/documents/2014Report.pdf.
6. Sinaiko AD, Chien AT, Rosenthal MB. The role of states in improving price transparency in health care. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6): 886-7.
7. Public Agenda. How much will it cost? How Americans use prices in health care. Public Agenda [serial on the Internet]. 2015 Mar 9 [cited 2016 Feb 1]. Available from: http://www.publicagenda.org/pages/how-much-will-it-cost.
8. Aliferis L. Variation in prices for common medical tests and procedures. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(1): 11-2.
9. Sinaiko AD, Rosenthal MB. Increased price transparency in health care-challenges and potential effects. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(10): 891-4.
10. Mehrotra A, Brannen T, Sinaiko AD. Use patterns of a state health care price transparency web site: what do patients shop for? Inquiry. 2014;51.
11. Whaley C, Schneider Chafen J, Pinkard S, Kellerman G, Bravata D, Kocher R, et al. Association between availability of health service prices and payments for these services. JAMA. 2014;312(16): 1670-6.
12. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1): 8-27.
13. In our mixed-sex models that included dummy variables for hospital referral regions instead of states, there was no significant difference between male and female patients in their propensity to search the Member Payment Estimator.
14. Rates of use of the tool by Aetna enrollees have continued to grow, increasing 51 percent in 2013 over the previous year (Chris Riedl, Aetna, personal communication, June 2, 2015).
15. Owens GM. Gender differences in health care expenditures, resource utilization, and quality of care. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14(3 Suppl):2-6.
16. Vaidya V, Partha G, Karmakar M. Gender differences in utilization of preventive care services in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012;21(2): 140-5.
17. Wu SJ, Sylwestrzak G, Shah C, DeVries A. 2014. Price transparency for MRIs increased use of less costly providers and triggered provider competition. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(8): 1391-8.